[Alison Specht]

Love the message!
And AET is a bit out of my ability in the bush as I am for the moment here .
Will check the minutes etc with eagerness, and thanks for arranging, too.
– Show quoted text -From: ***@***.***-groups.org on behalf of donald.v.sullivan via Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems’ Data IG
Sent: 18 March 2020 23:50:24
To: ***@***.*** ; Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems’ Data IG ; ***@***.*** ; Working Group on Ethical and Legal best practices for Drone Data in a global research context (WELDD)
Subject: [dronedata] Re: [EXTERNAL] [dronedata][weldd] RDA Pleanry 15 [dronedata] WELDD Virtual plenary session:
Dear Friends and Colleagues,
11:00 AM UTC is 04:00 PDT, and, as much as I love you all, I don’t love you THAT much …
Have a great meeting, looking forward to the outbriefs,
Don
———————————————
Don Sullivan
NASA Ames Research Center
Bldg N245, Rm 131a/MS 245-4
P.O. Box 1
Moffett Federal Airfield, CA 94035-0001
Office: +1 650 604 0526
Mobile: +1 650 714 9742
email: ***@***.***
———————————————
– Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc
“Scientists seek to understand what is, engineers seek to create what never was.”
– Theodore Karman
On 3/18/20, 5:57 AM, “***@***.***-groups.org on behalf of Vdb via Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems’ Data IG” wrote:
Hello Everyone
We have secured a slot for the virtual plenary: please register and we are looking forward to catching up and moving things forward!
Here is the link to the virtual plenary programme, which lists our session: https://www.rd-alliance.org/rda-virtual-plenary-programme
Also, below is the information for registering.
You are invited to a Zoom meeting.
When: Mar 19, 2020 11:00 AM Universal Time UTC
Register in advance for this meeting:
https://aarnet.zoom.us/meeting/register/upAlceGpqzoi92Glr3B6G9yVpq3mi2TuYQ
After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the meeting.
Beste
Freyja
—
Full post:
https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/small-unmanned-aircraft-systems%E2%80%…
Manage my subscriptions: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist
Stop emails for this post:
https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/68671

[Alison Specht]

Bonjour à tous (hi to everyone),
At this point in time I do not think I shall be attending, although I can point some I know are towards the session, which sounds great.
For a poster, Romain. Maybe we could submit a slightly revised version of the one presented to RDA13 as it is a slightly different audience.
How is the survey going? Reminder to those who have not spared the time as yet!
Best wishes,
Alison
From: on behalf of “Romain_David_13 via Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) IG”
Reply-To: “***@***.***”
Date: Wednesday, 22 May 2019 at 6:43 pm
To: “lmabile via Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) IG”
Subject: Re: [sharc-ig] quick question
ça me fait penser : elle pourrait aussi y soumettre un poster?
Ou peut être est ce trop tard?
Le mer. 22 mai 2019 à 10:24, lmabile via Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) IG a écrit :
Dear RDA-SHARC members,
Has anyone planned to attend the CODATA 2019 meeting ‘Towards
next-generation data-driven science: policies, practices and platforms’,
in Beijing, China, 19-20 September 2019?
Anne-Cambon Thomsen will organise a session there about ‘Expert views on
evaluating data sharing efforts and practices: an international dialogue
fostered by an interest group of the research data alliance’. You are
very welcome to participate if interested. Please let us know as soon as
possible…
Best, Laurence
—
Laurence Mabile, Chef de projet/Project manager
UMR1027 Inserm – Université Paul Sabatier / Toulouse III,
Epidémiologie et analyses en santé publique.
Equipe Trajectoires d’innovations en santé : enjeux bioéthiques et impact en santé publique
Equipe EQUITY
Faculté de médecine
—
Full post:
https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/sharing-rewards-and-credit-sharc-ig/po…
Manage my subscriptions: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist
Stop emails for this post:
https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/63323

[Alison Specht]

Fantastic Florencia!
________________________________
From: Florencia Grattarola
Sent: 26 February 2019 18:10:56
To: Romain_David_13; Alison Specht; Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) IG
Cc: msy; lmabile
Subject: RE: [sharc-ig] urgent, RDA-SHARC IG poster -RDA P13
Dear all,
Just writing to thanks Laurence, Romain and all for the great work.
Also, to let you know that with my association in Uruguay we will be submitting a new data paper on tetrapods (it will be the first biodiversity open database for the country!). Even though it was created following the FAIR Principles, I think it would be a great opportunity to test the tool and put the assessment in practice with the rest of my colleagues.
Thanks again!
Regards,
Florencia
—–Original Message—–
From: romain.david=***@***.***-groups.org On Behalf Of Romain_David_13
Sent: 26 February 2019 16:28
To: Alison Specht ; Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) IG
Cc: msy ; lmabile
Subject: Re: [sharc-ig] urgent, RDA-SHARC IG poster -RDA P13
Dear all
thanks for your remarks
please find attached the corrected version of the poster I will submit it tommorow
Best regards
Romain
SP : the summary of the poster is available here https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WgsSIL0usdoV8SZO65D8eQU2vlM1y20DRFxR…

[Alison Specht]

Dear Laurence and Romain,
Looks fine, and shows development (thanks!). Down to the wire time-wise, I know. I have had 3 days of travel and am a bit jet-lagged so hope this is clear.
To add a few points to those Yahia has made. All but one (no. 5 below) are editorial.
1. ASSESMENT is spelt ASSESSMENT (in the title it is wonky)
2. Remove the ‘the’ in the text below
* Develop gradual assessment of the researcher FAIRness literacy
3. No need for plural ‘tools’ in the phrase below, but it is still awkward. Maybe replace ‘experimentation’ with ‘testing’. I think that sounds better. Is that a correct interpretation? No space after Belmont and before the dash (please all attend the PARSEC co-located meeting at the RDA!!!)
* Tool testing in specific networks and in various scientific communities (IMI FAIRplus/Elixir community; BiodiFAIRse, Belmont-PARSEC, Citizen science networks, agronomy community…)
4. In the box ‘Input from Community’ I know what you mean but the word ‘highly’ is not a great usage. Remove.
To implement a highly fair appraisal of the sharing process…and then only one plural in user scientists. This harks to PARSEC.
5. I do not know what is meant by the ‘grid’ (a grid is a matrix with X and Y co-ordinates, not what you have here, which is more like a tree). And why is it ‘extensive’? Decision tree is OK (and used in the Box)…
‘denomination’ is a word used for currency or religious sect. Replace with ‘definitions’ or maybe say ‘Thesaurus of synthetic criteria’
MIND MAPPING thesaurus of synthetic criteria. Then in the survey it will be ‘decision tree’ rather than ‘grid’.
6. Note the change in tense. Anticipating launch of the survey before RDA, ‘was’ is sufficient, replacing ‘has been’.
A survey was launched in March 2019 to assess the usability and the validity of the decision tree.
7. no need for both plurals in the following : volunteer data producers/users scientists
8. Consistency with references. Not quite sure what the ‘sic_’ is but there you go!
* Reymonet N et al. (2018). Réaliser un plan de gestion de données « FAIR » : modèle. 〈sic_01690547v2〉
* Wilkinson MD et al. (2018). A design framework and exemplar metrics for FAIRness. Scientific data, 5, 180118. doi:10.1038/sdata.2018.118
* Wilkinson MD (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific data, 15, 160018. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18.
9. Addresses. Please note a space after the semi-colon before Fiona Murphy. Please note two address changes. I don’t know the new address for Anna, but it is not the FRB and has not been for more than 18 months. Maybe call her ‘independent researcher’. As Romain’s email address is at the top it should be removed from the affiliations.
Author affiliations : Romain DAVID (Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS, IRD, UAPV, Institut Méditerranéen de Biodiversité et d’Ecologie Marine et Continentale) ***@***.***; Laurence Mabile, INSERM-Université Paul Sabatier Toulouse III, FR; Mohamed Yahia, INIST-CNRS, Nancy, FR; Anne Cambon-Thomsen, INSERM-Université Paul Sabatier Toulouse III, FR; Anne-Sophie Archambeau, GBIF-UMS PatriNat, Paris, FR ; Louise Bezuidenhout, University of Oxford, UK; Sofie Bekaert, Gent University, BE; Gabrielle Bertier, McGill University, Montréal, CA – Université Paul Sabatier Toulouse III, FR; Elena Bravo, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Roma, IT; Jane Carpenter, University of Sydney, AUS ; Anna Cohen-Nabeiro, Fondation pour la Recherche sur la Biodiversité, Paris FR ; Aurélie Delavaud, Fondation pour la Recherche sur la Biodiversité, Paris FR ; Michele De Rosa, BONSAI, DEN; Laurent Dollé, Biothèque Wallonie-Bruxelles, BE; Florencia Grattarola, University of Lincoln, UK; Fiona Murphy, Murphy Mitchell Consulting Ltd, UK; Sophie Pamerlon, GBIF-UMS PatriNat, Paris, FR ; Alison Specht, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, the University of Queensland, AUST; Anne-Marie Tassé, P3G, Montreal, CA; Mogens Thomsen, INSERM-Université Paul Sabatier Toulouse III, FR; Martina Zilioli, CNR-IREA, Milan, IT.
From: on behalf of msy
Date: Monday, 25 February 2019 at 11:08
To: lmabile , “***@***.***-groups.org”
Subject: Re: [sharc-ig] urgent, RDA-SHARC IG poster -RDA P13
Hi all,
It’s really a great job and a very smart looking poster. Thank you all, especially Laurence and Romain.
Below are some very minor bugs ( or maybe they are not after all!) :
* Box “ASSESMENT PROCESS” :
* 3 Levels of criterion (use plural for level)
* I don’t understand the scores you use as an example for Findable (need some explanation for the scoring…)
* You give the same score for ‘Never’ and ‘Always’; ‘Sometimes’ has a score which is less than ‘Never’. It lacks logic at a first read..
* Box “POSSIBLE OPEN ISSUES” :
* ‘Develop step by….compliance incrementation’ maybe you meant ‘compliance implementation’ because incrementation is already indicated in the words ‘step by step’.
* Box “ INPUT NEEDED FROM RESEARCH COMMUNITIES ” :
* ‘……….This process requires participation, time,…’. I propose to use the word ‘involvement’ instead of ‘participation’ because it’s stronger and more inclusive.
Greetings,
[cid:***@***.***]
Mohamed S. Yahia
En charge des activités de [https://schema.datacite.org/dc-logo.gif%5D
Equipe Valorisation des Données de la Recherche
Département de l’Offre de Services
Inist – CNRS
2, allée du Parc de Brabois
CS 10310
54519 Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy Cedex
tél : +33 (0)3 83 50 46 00 poste 4144
De : laurence.mabile=***@***.***-groups.org [mailto:***@***.***-groups.org] De la part de lmabile
Envoyé : vendredi 22 février 2019 15:39
À : ***@***.***-groups.org
Objet : [sharc-ig] urgent, RDA-SHARC IG poster -RDA P13
Dear all,
We have prepared a poster reporting the work of SHARC and its current development regarding the extensive FAIRness assessment grid. This poster will be presented by Romain David at RDA P13. As for the previous one, we’d like to have those of you who have been contributing to the background paper (still ongoing) in the authors . Could you please have a look at it (attached), and give your quick comments if any, we do need this as soon as possible before Tuesday feb 26th (if you do not wish to be part of the authors please let us know, otherwise no reply from you will be considered as a yes).
Very sorry for the short notice once again!
Many thanks by advance!!
All the best,
Laurence, Romain
—
Laurence Mabile, Chef de projet/Project manager
UMR1027 Inserm – Université Paul Sabatier / Toulouse III,
Epidémiologie et analyses en santé publique : risques, maladies
chroniques et handicap.
Equipe 4: Génomique, biothérapies et santé publique.
Equipe 5: Inégalités sociales de Santé
Faculté de médecine
37 allées Jules Guesde 31062 Toulouse Cedex 9, France
Tel : +33 (0)5 61 14 56 47
Fax : +33 (0)5 61 14 56 23
E-mail : ***@***.***-tlse3.fr

[Alison Specht]

Dear Louise and Fiona, Laurence and Anne,
I really like these questions! The first resonates very much with me personally.
Thanks for the notes page: that’s a really good idea.
Best wishes,
Alison
From: on behalf of lmabile
Date: Tuesday, 6 November 2018 at 11:22
To: “***@***.***-groups.org”
Cc: Lucia Lotter , Mary Kasule
Subject: [sharc-ig] SHARC session at RDA P12, Gaborone, Botswana 8 nov
Dear Sharc members,
Louise Bezuidenhout and Fiona Murphy from our IG will be running the SHARC’s session at RDA P12 in Gaborone next thursday 8 nov 9.30-11.00 (central african time, UTC/GMT +2 hours). The objective is to address more specifically data sharing challenges within African academic infrastructures and to come up with concrete actions to support resource sharing that could be implemented within African research contexts. Notably, will be discussed: How do we incentivise data sharing in situations where individuals have invested their own money into their research? What is the empirical evidence around the benefits that accrue to researchers when they share their data? Will research partnerships and co-authorship be acceptable conditions for obtaining access to secondary data?
Remote participation will be possible. See the meeting page at: https://www.rd-alliance.org/ig-sharing-rewards-and-credit-sharc-rda-12th…
Note from the session organisers: we invite any SHARC IG members, session participants or other interested parties to post relevant links or questions they would like to see addressed by this group either during the session or later.
Link to the collaborative notes page: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HKGyWGfDopIcFy4poI8DVP1v6ooArNOocHvB…
Looking forward to interacting with you,
Louise, Fiona,
Laurence and Anne (remotely)
—
Laurence Mabile, Chef de projet/Project manager
UMR1027 Inserm – Université Paul Sabatier / Toulouse III,
Epidémiologie et analyses en santé publique : risques, maladies chroniques et handicap.
Faculté de médecine
37 allées Jules Guesde 31062 Toulouse Cedex 9, France
E-mail : ***@***.***-tlse3.fr

[Author]

Replies