What are you looking for?

The RDA TIGER Project

The RDA TIGER project (2022–2025) has been a roaring success in strengthening the global Research Data Alliance community. The RDA TIGER project set out to create and provide a suite of support services to RDA Working Groups (WGs) that concretely align, harmonise and standardise Open Science developments and technologies globally, with a specific focus on WGs that contribute to the EOSC and broader European ecosystem. Through the supported WGs and their careful selection based on specific criteria that consider their demonstrable alignment with the ESOC Strategic Research and Innovation Agenda, the project made direct contributions to the European Open Science Cloud Partnership, while also supporting the international engagement and alignment of policies, technologies, methodologies, practices and other outputs relating to EOSC and European Open Science developments. 

RDA TIGER is now finished. Browse this page for project outputs and resources.

Research Data Alliance facilitation of Targeted International working Groups for EOSC-related Research solutions (RDA TIGER)

© 2025 RDA TIGER – GA 101094406

Landscape analysis on the value of RDA Outputs to EOSC

As part of its mission to align the work of its supported Working Groups and the outputs of the wider RDA community with the mission of the European Open Science Cloud (EOSC), the RDA TIGER project undertook a large-scale analysis and mapping of RDA Group activities and outputs to the EOSC and wider European research data landscape. This work, presented in the project deliverable ‘RDA TIGER D3.6: Landscape analysis on the value of RDA Outputs to EOSC‘, demonstrates the alignment of RDA outputs with key strategic priorities in Europe and the significant potential for leveraging the RDA platform and community efforts towards harmonising efforts across the region.

The Landscape analysis on the value of RDA Outputs to EOSC focuses on four areas which represent key features of the wider European research data landcsape. These areas are:

  • EOSC Strategic Research & Innovation Agenda (SRIA) Implementation Challenges
  • European Commission-funded Horizon Europe projects
  • European Research Infrastructures
  • European Union member states’ National Open Science policies

Clicking on the links above you can explore further the different sections of the analysis and access directly the kumu.io interactive visualisations. These will allow you to dive deeper into the connections between RDA Groups and the wider European landscape, seeing the current shared concerns and potential areas for further collaboration and development.

Cascading Grant Projects

Driving Open Science and Interoperability through RDA TIGER Cascade Grants: 2nd wave

RDA TIGER Cascade Grants are funding projects that lead to impact on the Open Science landscape and the interoperability of Open Science solutions within the European Open Science Cloud (EOSC). 

Cascading Grant Projects

Driving Open Science and Interoperability through RDA TIGER Cascade Grants: 1st wave

RDA TIGER Cascade Grants are funding projects that lead to impact on the Open Science landscape and the interoperability of Open Science solutions within the European Open Science Cloud (EOSC). 


RDA TIGER Supporting the EOSC ecosystem

The RDA TIGER project provided a suite of support services to RDA Working Groups (WGs) that concretely align, harmonise and standardise Open Science developments and technologies globally, with a specific focus on WGs that contribute to the EOSC and broader European ecosystem. Through the supported WGs and their careful selection based on specific criteria that consider their demonstrable alignment with the SRIA, the project made direct contributions to the European Open Science Cloud Partnership, while also supporting the international engagement and alignment of policies, technologies, methodologies, practices and other outputs relating to EOSC and European Open Science developments. 

RDA TIGER developed and provided targeted support services for RDA WGs, effectively identifying key partners for the groups, and increasing their work efficiency by facilitation and other support actions, ultimately maximising the impact WG results have on the EOSC, global Open Science, and society. RDA TIGER leveraged the effective instrument of community-driven RDA Working Groups and the foundations of EOSC, RDA, CODATA, Research Software Alliance (ReSA), and the Open Science movement in general, and provided a way to efficiently use the RDA platform for internationalisation and standardisation of research outputs that allow science to be reproducible and results and data to be shared openly. The RDA TIGER service platform included planning, engagement, communication, facilitation and finalisation services to the WGs, maximising their outputs and their overall impact. The RDA TIGER services built on previous RDA-related projects both in Europe and internationally.

Read more:

Project Objectives

  • To facilitate and support well-defined Working Groups between key European and international initiatives, resulting in concrete alignment, harmonisation, and standardisation of Open Science developments and technologies globally. 

  • To directly contribute to the European Open Science Cloud Partnership, by supporting (via the Working Groups) the international engagement and alignment of policies, technologies, methodologies, practices and other outputs relating to EOSC and European Open Science developments more generally.
  • To develop and offer a service platform for these Working Groups, effectively identifying key partners for the groups, increasing their work efficiency by facilitation and other support actions, and ultimately maximising the impact WG results have on the EOSC, global Open Science, and society.

Project Workplan

The project provided services according to the stage of each WG throughout its lifecycle of eighteen months, from inception to completion: 

  1. Upcoming Working Groups

The project provided support in FACILITATING the forming of WGs by finding WG members in coordination with the new active global engagement and LANDSCAPING analysis service, as well as by helping to COMMUNICATE WG ideas widely and offering practical help with case statement preparation and output definition. 

  1. Ongoing Working Groups

For ongoing WGs, the project provided facilitation and ORGANISATION services, leading to a reduced workload for the WG members and chairs, who can then concentrate on providing their expertise. Other services include communication, writing and editing, and output development services. We also provided THIRD PARTY GRANTS for output testing, development, travel and even external consultancy services. 

  1. Ending/Finished Working Groups 

For ending and finished WGs, the RDA TIGER project provided help on last-mile development and writing, output finalisation and adoption, guidance on potential standardisation pathways and help with the (upcoming) RDA Maintenance Facility maintained by DANS.

Groups supported by RDA TIGER

In this section you can find all RDA WGs supported by the project across all types of support: In-kind, Cascade Grants, Subcontracts for external expert support and event and workshop support. Links to associated projects and outputs, as well as to the WG page and formal outputs are also linked below:

Communication with several stakeholders have presented the CoreTrustSeal Board with a challenge. One important group of stakeholders are the providers of products and services which either directly provide technical systems for repositories or otherwise provide partnership and support. These actors have always been a critical part of the data ecosystem. The existing CoreTrustSeal Requirements and evidence expectations may be elaborated and/or extended to allow the assessment process to differentiate more clearly between 1) a specialist (i.e. domain/subjectbased) repository serving a defined designated community with a clear knowledge base 2) a technical repository service provider which could support bit-level preservation for either of the above across the data lifecycle (for example, deposit, secure storage, access). The proposed Working Group will produce a community-based catalogue of requirements for trustworthy technical repository service providers. Such a catalogue would provide the basis for a certification procedure for technical repository service providers within the EOSC and beyond.

1) In-kind:

  • Facilitation (WP5)
  • Communications (WP2)

The WG intends to propose a methodology for the alignment of controlled vocabularies in many languages. The methodology will describe the various steps of the alignment process: selection of the controlled vocabularies, alignment through automated processes, manual curation and validation. The WG output will benefit the services providing searching tools (libraries, research infrastructures) and the researchers willing to describe their data in many languages. It is expected that the methodology will significantly increase the connections of controlled vocabularies in many languages. This will be measurable by the increased number of resources available in a single search engine, as they will allow searching resources in more languages. The impact will also be measurable by the number of resources described with a common controlled vocabulary. Depending on the technical capabilities of the services where the method will be implemented, it should be possible to properly compare the usage metrics of resources that use multilingual descriptors and those that do not.

1) In-kind:

  • Facilitation (WP5)
  • Communications (WP2)
  • Landscape and engagement (WP3)

Intended output: Specifications for drone services and resulting data for research, and a demonstrator to show how these guidelines support the design and implementation of cloud-based infrastructures for SUAS data. The primary target audience are researchers working with data collected by SUAS platforms. The open nature of the guidelines will support interoperability which in turn is expected to lower entry barriers for SMEs as service providers for SUAS-based missions.

1) In-kind:

  • Facilitation (WP5)
  • Communications (WP2)
  • Landscape and engagement (WP3)

Provide end users (e.g. researchers, data analysts, AI processes) with unified discovery of datasets from new data repositories as well as access to the FAIRtracks ecosystem through new access points and software tools. Facilitate the adoption of FAIRtracks as a metadata exchange standard by a selection of data providers, integrated with their existing metadata standards and data repositories and bridging to specialized data portals and analysis tools.

1) In-kind:

  • Facilitation (WP5)
  • Communications (WP2)

2) Financial support for the enhancement of RDA outputs by an external expert (subcontracting)

Subcontracting agreement with external expert for the preparation of the following outputs:

  • A document outlining the process of developing a use-case in context of project 31 of the BioHackathon Europe 2024.
  • An adapted schema, in line with developments in the FGA-WG, for the use-case. For this deliverable Whyqd (https://whyqd.com) was used.
  • A step-by-step working guide and tutorial to implement metadata transformations for the use-case.

The above outputs will be incorporated in WG outputs D1.2 and D2.1.

The GORC WG is working to develop a roadmap for global alignment to help set priorities for Commons development and integration. In support of this roadmap, this International Model WG will collect and curate a set of attributes that will allow Commons developers to compare features across science clouds and commons. When relevant, the WG will also collect information about how existing commons are measuring success, adoption or use of their attributes and services within their organization, such as number or amount of data downloads, contributed software, and similar key performance indicators (KPI) and access statistics.

Outputs:

Related adoption stories:

1) In-kind:

  • Communications (WP2)

The National PID Strategies WG explores how PIDs form part of national policy implementation frameworks. There are systemic and network benefits from widespread and consistent PID adoption, and funders, government agencies, and national research communities have created PID consortia or policies (including mandates) in pursuit of these benefits.

Related adoption: Developing an EOSC-compatible National PID Strategy (RDA TIGER Cascading Grant project)

In-kind:

  • Communications (WP2)

The Policies in Research Organisations for Research Software (PRO4RS) Working Group is co-convened with the Research Software Alliance (ReSA) and aims to create a community of stakeholders involved in promoting and/or implementing policy that supports research software at the research institution level (e.g., universities, national laboratories). This will build on ReSA’s taskforce, Research institution policies to support research software, which is already building a collection of relevant institutional policies.

Outputs:

Adoption stories:

1) In kind:

  • Facilitation (WP5)
  • Communications (WP2)

2) Cascading Grant (See adoption above)

The focus of the WG is on increasing uptake of the FAIR Principles in materials research (in particular in connection with Interoperability and Reusability), supported by improved resources, in particular widely-agreed and FAIR terminologies, metadata and ontologies. While the main focus of the WG is in the material sciences, close interactions with cognate domains, in particular chemistry, are crucial in order to avoid conflicting approaches and also to utilise and integrate with already existing semantic artefacts and resources in these fields.

1) In kind:

  • Facilitation (WP5)
  • Communications (WP2)

2) Financial support for the enhancement of RDA outputs by an external expert

Financial support for external expert for the production on report reviewing the state of the art, with a particular focus on the current use of DCAT and Schema.org, and the use of metadata for materials data cataloguing in different regions. Material for this report was gathered by means of interviews with stakeholders, desk research, input from Working Group co-chairs and a workshop on data cataloguing: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17949060

The principal objective of DSTS_CS-WG is to create a listing of the specific data-related needs and challenges arising during crisis situations mapped to data systems, tools, and services (DSTSs) indicating their applicability, interoperability, and utility, with reference to the data value chain.

1) In-kind:

  • Facilitation (WP5)
  • Communications (WP2)

The goal of the WG is to reduce data management overhead within and between organisations working with wind energy. This will be done by firstly creating a recommendation “Guidelines for improving FAIR data maturity in wind energy in practice”. This will then be used to create a wind energy FAIR Implementation Profile (FIP), which is a methodology developed within the GO FAIR initiative.

Outputs:

1) In-kind:

  • Facilitation (WP5)
  • Communications (WP2)
  • Landscape and Engagement (WP3)

The principal objective of AIDV-WG is to examine the promises, challenges, and barriers to the use of AI in data sharing and Open Science having regard to scientists and research institutions as well as to policy and the interests of patients, communities, health advocates, and those stakeholders otherwise underrepresented in these important initiatives for Open Science. Working to support the EOSC Future project and facilitate the implementation of EOSC across research communities, this AIDV-WG examines interoperability issues arising across federated and non-federated systems. Particular attention is given to national and institutional policies (ethics/legal) and how they affect the generation of metadata and interdisciplinary work and cooperation.

Outputs:

Adoption stories:

1) In-kind:

  • Facilitation (WP5)
  • Communications (WP2)

This Work Group focuses on the TRUST principles and aims to discover barriers and hesitation for implmentation and adoption of TRUST principles allowing for the reduction in ambiguiting and confusion about the relationship between TRUST principles, certification processes, and metrics of other princples frameworks (FAIR, CARE).

1) In-kind:

  • Facilitation (WP5)
  • Communications (WP2)

Digital twins, customised simulation models pioneered in industry, are beginning to gain ground in medicine and healthcare, with some significant successes in cardiovascular diagnostics and insulin pump control. Because the immune system plays a vital role in such a wide range of diseases and health conditions, from fighting pathogens to autoimmune disorders, digital twins of the immune system (IDTs) will have an exceptionally high impact. The Building Immune Digital Twins WG aims to foster a network of collaborators and experts in all relevant research areas. The ultimate goal of the WG is to help create a long-term interdisciplinary immune digital twin community willing to take on the challenges of this exciting new field.

Related adoption:

1) In-kind:

  • Facilitation (WP5)
  • Communications (WP2)

2) Adoption-enabling Cascading Grant (see above)

3) Financial support for the enhancement of RDA outputs by an external expert

Subcontract provision towards the development of the BIDT dashboard, further expanded as part of the cascade grant. This subcontract provided:

Assumptive personas: Output from the online personas exercise

  • Feature Blitz: Output from online workshop
  • Roadmap: Output from online workshop
  • Information Architecture: Recommended navigation for the BIDT portal
  • Reference Architecture: Potential solution architecture for the BIDT portal
  • Visual Design: Three concept designs

This Working Group aims to address challenges regarding multi-omics data management and sharing for reuse of complex Omics dataset. It will do so by creating a matrix of identified reporting guidelines and standards essential for integration of multiple Omics metadata elements across the different domain technologies. By leveraging preexisting Omics domain metadata standards, ontologies, and reporting guidelines, this working group will advance current siloed community harmonisation efforts with much needed cross-disciplinary diversity for creating more sustainable standard reporting guidelines fully representative of various data types and computational formats.

Outputs:

1) In-kind:

  • Facilitation (WP5)
  • Communications (WP2)

2) Financial support for the enhancement of WG outputs by an external expert (subcontracting)

Two subcontracting grants for the initial development of the dashboard and subsequent refinements:

Mappings and crosswalks have been identified as an essential element of semantic interoperability in the context of the EOSC Interoperability Framework. This WG aims at working with the various communities and the RDA WGs which have generated mappings to converge toward common guidelines to make different types of mappings FAIR, and a common machine-readable/actionable set of representations of the mappings beyond the capabilities of the current existing specifications. The WG will create a unifying classification of mappings that builds on existing classifications such as RDA Brokering Framework and Semantic Mapping Vocabulary (SEMAPV).

1) In-kind:

  • Facilitation (WP5)
  • Communications (WP2)

2) Financial support for the enhancement of RDA outputs by an external expert

Subcontract with external expert for the provision of the following outputs:

The Reproducibility Checklist Working Group (WG) aims to develop a discipline-agnostic, standardized checklist to promote scientific integrity by providing a practical framework for researchers, scientists, and organizations to systematically assess and document the reproducibility of data and computational science. This initiative seeks to ensure that research and scientific outputs are reliable across various disciplines.

1) In-kind:

  • Facilitation (WP5)
  • Communications (WP2)
  • Landscape and Engagement (WP3)

The core objective of this WG is to create a Health Data Commons Global Open Research Commons (GORC) profile. Health data commons (HDCs) are the health-data-focused versions of data commons, which bring together health data infrastructures.

1) In-kind:

  • Facilitation (WP5)
  • Communications (WP2)

The Computational Modelling of Health Data working group will focus on improving the reproducibility, transparency, and accessibility of computational models developed for health research. The working group will engage the community in shaping a curated resource of best practices, datasets, workflows, and standards for modelling approaches ranging from simulation and statistical models to AI and language models developed for health research. It will also explore opportunities for collaboration across existing RDA groups and broader communities working at the intersection of health, data science, and computational modelling.

1) In-kind:

  • Facilitation (WP5)
  • Communications (WP2)

The Ethics in Agricultural Data WG will address the ethical issues related to the treatment of agricultural data, focusing especially on the challenges and risks for the most marginalized actors in the data value chains: smallholder farmers and indigenous people. 

1) In-kind:

  • Facilitation (WP5)
  • Communications (WP2)
  • Landscape and Engagement (WP3)

The MaLDReTH II Working Group aims to advance and sustain the digital research tools landscape mapping initiative established by its predecessor. Building on the first community-sourced, systematically organized map of the research data lifecycle, this group will enhance the framework through four key deliverables: an attributes checklist for tool assessment, development of use cases, a sustainability framework, and integration with the GORC International Model.

Outputs:

1) In-kind:

  • Facilitation (WP5)
  • Communications (WP2)

This group will develop a standardized Application Programming Interface (API) for machine-actionable Data Management Plans (maDMPs). This API will provide a unified approach to accessing and managing information within maDMPs, ensuring interoperability across different tools and systems. 

1) In-kind:

  • Facilitation (WP5)
  • Communications (WP2)

The Global Open Research Commons International Implementations Working Group (GORC II WG) will maintain the recommendation and supporting outputs from the GORC International Model WG (GORC IM WG), specifically for the GORC International Model through the improvement of its usability by and relevance to the commons and research infrastructure community. 

1) In-kind:

  • Facilitation (WP5)
  • Communications (WP2)

2) Cascading Grant:

The I-ADOPT WG will focus on creating a community-agreed framework for representing observable properties by bringing together groups that have been working on developing terminologies to accurately encode what was measured, observed, derived, or computed.

Outputs:

1) In-kind:

  • Communications (WP2)

2) Financial Support:

  • Contribution to hackathon prize awards for winners to attend RDA Plenary 23 in Costa Rica virtually
  • Financial support to organise two workshops for WG members in support of the WG’s efforts as a candidate model for extending the OGC OMS (OGC Observations, Measurements, and Samples/ISO 19156) standard.

This working group proposes to address the use case of citing a large number of existing objects (e.g., datasets, software, or physical samples) in a way that allows credit for individual objects to be properly assigned.

1)Financial support for the enhancement of RDA outputs by an external expert

Subcontract provision with external expert for the organisation and delivery of a hackathon with IPCC use case providers, and publication of draft of CCO metadata standard for community review; report available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17816544. In addition, the expert provided provenance / Complex Citation plan to IPCC AR7’s First Lead Author Meeting (LAM1) and discussion of the plans with the chapter data scientists of the author teams, available here: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18754391

The efficient and effective reuse of data requires that users, be they humans or machines, be able to find and access data at fine levels of granularity. The WG will explore key questions and collect and share valuable information for how to best support data granularity, providing guidance to help data professionals to determine the best level of granularity for user discovery, access, interoperability and citability.

1)Financial support for the enhancement of RDA outputs by an external expert (subcontracting):

Support to produce the completed recommendation document of data granularity approaches representing the outcomes of the Working Group, incorporating input (existing and forthcoming) from Working Group members and feedback from the P20 plenary, and presentation at RDA Plenary 22.

Cross-Fertilisation Webinars

Project Deliverables

These guidelines consist the main aspects of providing additional direct support for the RDA TIGER supported RDA working groups, such as procedures on providing and resourcing support actions, such as subcontracted services (consultancy), 3rd party support, or adoption grants.

This deliverable lists the types of the data produced in the RDA TIGER project via the RDA TIGER personnel. The data storage and management solutions, and their role in the data lifetime are discussed. The DMP also includes information on the project and partner allocation of resources, data security, ethics and exploitation.

This Deliverable presents the RDA TIGER project handbook. It defines the main management structures, reporting procedures, responsibilities and internal and external project communication processes. Where appropriate the handbook directs the reader to the Consortium Agreement, Dissemination, Communication and Exploitation plan as well as the RDA TIGER Data Management Plan (D1.2). This document will guide the RDA TIGER processes across the consortium over the project period and will be updated and/or revised where needed.

The RDA TIGER project aimed at enhancing the effectiveness of Research Data Alliance Working Groups by providing targeted direct and external support to increase the impact of WG outputs on the European Open Science Cloud (EOSC), global Open Science practices, and researchers, data professionals and the society at large. Across the project lifetime (1 January 2023 – 31 December 2025), RDA TIGER awarded 32 grants benefiting 19 RDA WGs. 

Under its Grant Agreement, RDA TIGER delivered three main types of direct and external support:

  1. Minor grants meant for travel purposes for key WG personnel to participate in the WG meetings; 
  2. Hiring of external experts for specific tasks as defined by the WGs;
  3. Grants given directly to a 3rd party to support the actual main activities of the WG using the Financial Support to Third Parties (i.e. cascade grant) mechanism.

This deliverable provides an overview of the different direct and external support mechanisms within RDA TIGER and how they were managed by the project, in particular by WP1. The deliverable provides statistics on each direct and external support mechanism, the impact of these mechanisms on RDA WGs and the broader EOSC and Open Science landscape, and lessons learned from the implementation of these mechanisms. 

This deliverable answers to the Commission request for a policy feedback regarding the RDA TIGER in the wider EOSC and policy environment. It specifies the potential policy impact of the RDA TIGER supported Working Groups, and describes wider policy recommendations from the project and RDA in general.

This document is the final policy brief of the RDA TIGER project, building on recommendations and policy impact areas identified in the first brief published in 2023. It outlines the contribution of the RDA TIGER project, and given the nature of the project, the Research Data Alliance (RDA) community of 16,000 members globally, to the EOSC Strategic Research and Innovation Agenda (SRIA). 

The RDA TIGER project provided a suite of support services to RDA Working Groups (WGs) that concretely align, harmonise and standardise Open Science developments and technologies globally, with a specific focus on WGs that contribute to the EOSC and broader European ecosystem. Through the supported WGs and their careful selection based on specific criteria that consider their demonstrable alignment with the SRIA, the project made direct contributions to the European Open Science Cloud Partnership, while also supporting the international engagement and alignment of policies, technologies, methodologies, practices and other outputs relating to EOSC and European Open Science developments. 

The RDA TIGER Communication Toolkit builds on the RDA brand, utilises existing materials and expands them where appropriate. This document outlines communications and marketing materials that will be used during the project lifetime to facilitate RDA TIGER service awareness primarily, but also to support the RDA TIGER individual services.

This deliverable outlines the high-level plan for the RDA TIGER project to maximise the a) service awareness and dissemination of project outputs, and b) the communication service offered to RDA Working Groups (WGs). It presents the strategic phases, objectives and priorities, outlines planned communication activities, and carries out an analysis of the expected service users, also considering the service’s target audiences and stakeholders. The document also provides a brief overview of the communications materials that have already been developed as part of the communication kit, and outlines the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)  that WP2 will follow. Finally, this document presents the anticipated risks, and touches on potential plans for the exploitation of the project results.

This is an updated version of the plan based on developments that occured since D2.2 (v. 1.0), which was created in May 2023. This version 2.0 of the report was created in August 2024. 

This report outlines the high-level plan for the RDA TIGER project to engage with European National Networks, and describes activities that have taken place at the time of writing, as well as those still being planned. The deliverable defines European National Networks, identifies key stakeholders within those networks, and outlines how national and regional RDA communities have been involved in engaging the European community with RDA TIGER-supported Working Groups, and the RDA more broadly. Finally, this document presents the next steps in continuing to engage European National Networks, both within the lifetime of the RDA TIGER project and beyond.

This deliverable provides a final overview of the RDA TIGER communication service provision and outlines key lessons learned throughout the project’s implementation. As the concluding report of Work Package (WP) 2 on Communications, it reflects on the evolution, delivery, and impact of the communications activities and service designed to support the RDA TIGER Working Groups (WGs), amplify project outputs, and engage both internal and external stakeholders across the European Open Science landscape.

The RDA TIGER project was established to support the development of high-impact, internationally aligned outputs by providing a suite of support services and grants to RDA Working Groups, with a particular focus on those contributing to the European Open Science Cloud (EOSC). WP2 played a central role in this effort by designing and delivering a service communications offering tailored to the lifecycle of each WG, from initial idea dissemination and internal coordination, to output promotion and adoption-focused outreach.

Building on the planning and frameworks established in Deliverables D2.1 Communication Toolkit, D2.2 Updated Plan for Dissemination and Exploitation, and D2.3 European Network Engagement Progress, this final report presents an integrated view of WP2 implementation. It documents how the communications service matured from its pilot phase into a responsive, high-impact component of the RDA TIGER support platform, working closely with the supported WGs across each lifecycle stage. It highlights the collaboration with the facilitation and landscape services as well as the RDA Knowledge Base (KB) development team, and presents how the service strategically showcased the importance and impact of the project as a whole to the broader research data community. 

WP2 activities enabled increased visibility of RDA TIGER WGs across Europe, strengthened engagement with RDA Regions and European infrastructures, and supported the dissemination and adoption of WG outputs through events, webinars, targeted communications, and cross-project synergies.

This deliverable also reports on metrics and analytics to showcase the impact of communication activities, and reflects on key lessons learned. It highlights the importance of embedding communications into WG workflows from the start, and the value of tailoring support to co-chair experience levels and specific requirements.

As RDA TIGER concludes, the communication service leaves behind a portfolio of reusable resources, a strengthened presence for RDA WGs and their Outputs within the European Open Science landscape, and a set of good practices that can inform both the RDA’s future operations and similar initiatives aiming to connect global standards with European priorities.

RDA TIGER establishes a suite of concrete services to support the development of relevant and well-focused Working Groups of the Research Data Alliance (RDA). One element of RDA TIGER is the Landscape Analysis Service (WP3) which provides potential WGs and the Facilitation Service (WP5) with background knowledge of Open Science activities in related areas, with the rationale that no WG should duplicate existing work, and that landscape gaps and emerging challenges should be addressed. 

The Landscape Analysis Service will contribute to those aims by building a knowledge base of selected resources. This deliverable sets out a description of the scope of the service, how the knowledge base will be built and the methodology behind identifying relevant initiatives to include at this early stage of the project.

This deliverable is intended primarily for internal use and, in particular, to guide the Facilitation Service in their work to identify commonalities and complementarities. 

This deliverable sets out to report on the RDA Working Group (WG) engagement services that have been carried out to date in the RDA TIGER project. RDA TIGER has started to develop a series of support services to offer the RDA community and a major part of this work is to ensure that the services it creates are optimised for the best user experience, that the candidates of the support services are satisfied and that the support provided is of high-quality and efficient. This report will also provide an overview of work on engagement activities, and some key take-away’s moving ahead for the second two years of the project.

This deliverable represents the first update of the engagement component of the RDA TIGER Landscape & Engagement service. Following on from ‘D3.1 Engagement Services Service Update’ this report describes how the RDA TIGER project has provided its supported WGs with engagement services over the first two years of the project. Included here is an outline of the types of engagement strategies co-developed by the RDA TIGER project partners and WG co-chairs, the factors influencing these, and the associated tasks and activities used to execute these strategies. Also described is the overlapping nature of RDA TIGER support services and how these influence the engagement activities. 

Based on the key performance indicators and the feedback gathered so far in the project, the engagement component of the RDA TIGER Landscape & Engagement service has been a success. The project overall is on track or has already met various KPIs. A key aim for the final year of the project is for the various support services to work more in concert with one another in order to maximise the impact that the project itself and the outputs of its supported WGs have.

This report is intended to update and extend the ground covered by the earlier RDA TIGER WP3 deliverable D3.1, submitted in June 2023. It does not reproduce content from that earlier overview but attempts to provide a summary of relevant activity occurring in the last 15 months and its relationship to the RDA ecosystem. In doing so, the primary purpose of this document is to support the landscape research activities within WP3 as well as the other services of the project, as follows: 

  • Facilitation of the Working Groups’ internal processes (WP5), by documenting and summarising the changes in the landscape;
  • Communication support (WP2), by identifying stakeholders that could have a particularly keen interest in the outputs of the supported Working Group;
  • Output support (WP4), by gathering information related to organisation and external publications that can be included in the Maintenance Platform once the technical developments have been completed.

More broadly, we also hope that the document is helpful to anyone interested in the recent developments in EOSC- and FAIR data-related activities. To support this broader use, the document provides extensive links to the background material, primarily as footnotes to make it as easy as possible to access the background material with minimal disruption of the reading (or browsing) process of the document itself.

Building upon D3.1 content, we provide an update on the progress to date with preparing the contents of the RDA graph database, its impact on RDA TIGER activity, and how it contributes to the OS landscape work that informs the landscape awareness service. We also analyse the themes and topics that appear to be developing amongst recent global Open Science initiatives and activities, and the extent to which these are reflected in the nascent and emerging RDA Working Groups supported by RDA TIGER support services.  We also offer some observations on apparent gaps in provision of RDA Working Groups that tackle contemporary Open Science issues as mapped i) against the current EOSC SRIA aims, and ii) geographically.

However, we do not attempt to perform advanced analysis of the observed developments for two reasons:

  • The Maintenance Platform will provide tools to directly support many of the analysis tasks, both statistical ones (e.g., number of publications per year, languages used) and network analysis (co-authorship, topics of interest, institutions,…).
  • The impact of any particular development is highly dependent on the focus of the Working Group supported and the extent of its progress.

Nevertheless, we observed a few common trends that are relevant for the project as a whole, as well as for the future support activities that will eventually supersede the role RDA TIGER is currently playing. The first such observation is the relatively rapid increase in the number of RDA WGs, from 47 in June 2023 to 59 in October 2024, with further seven waiting for endorsement. In parallel with this increase, the proportion of WGs focused on domain specific issues has grown. These trends should be seen both as an asset (growing community with greater diversity leading to new cross-pollination opportunities) and a challenge (renewed efforts as well as new tools and approaches to maintain a coherent overview of the activities are needed). Furthermore, additional efforts are needed to balance the participation across geographical areas and language groups. Successfully addressing these challenges will mean that the RDA and the RDA TIGER project could be even more efficient and effective in supporting alignment of EOSC and other European FAIR-data related initiatives with global developments.

This report is a final update of the work done by Work Package 3 (WP3) of the RDA TIGER project.WP3 supports RDA Working Groups (WGs) by providing insights of the Open Science (OS) landscape,including EOSC and FAIR data activities, to avoid RDA WGs effort duplication and enhance theirimpact. The WP3 activities include the targeted Landscape Awareness service analyses, based onrequest of RDA WGs, and the Landscape Monitoring & Engagement, which tracks trends andemerging OS initiatives. The report also highlights the contributions from RDA TIGER Output Servicesand the lessons learned during the three years project. The final section provides recommendationson strengthening WP3 activities, the resource integration, and the alignment within the OSecosystem to maximise the value and sustainability of RDA outputs.

This report articulates the value and impact of the Research Data Alliance Groups and their Outputs on the European Open Science landscape and particularly the European Open Science Cloud (EOSC) ecosystem. The analysis demonstrates the alignment of RDA outputs with key strategic priorities in Europe and the significant potential for leveraging the RDA platform towards harmonising efforts across the region. This is accomplished by mapping RDA outputs and Group activities to the EOSC Strategic Research and Innovation Agenda (SRIA), Horizon Europe projects, European Research Infrastructures, and European Union member states’ National Open Science policies. The RDA TIGER project is highlighted as a valuable initiative towards focusing and amplifying the work of the global RDA community to address European challenges, facilitating cross-fertilisation between European and international initiatives and being a force multiplier of the impact of RDA in the region. 

Research Data Alliance’s (RDA) Working Groups (WGs) aim to solve a specific research data related issue in a relatively short period of time. In practice, these groups are created by the RDA community, and rely on the voluntary contributions from the community to achieve its stated objectives. While this approach has been demonstrated to be successful in the last decade, certain areas have been identified where improvements can be made.  The RDA TIGER project addresses some of these improvements [1].

RDA TIGER establishes a suite of concrete services to support the Working Groups (WG) of the Research Data Alliance (RDA). Work Package 4 in the TIGER project oversees the service for WG Output Support, particularly the RDA Maintenance Platform (RDA-MP), and various output guidance services. The objectives are to ensure high quality, usefulness, maintenance and sustainability of the WG outputs.

This report provides a work plan for the activities, outputs and, and services envisaged for the work package.

Research Data Alliance’s (RDA) Working Groups (WGs) aim to solve specific research data related issues in a relatively short period of time. These groups are created by the RDA community, and rely on the voluntary contributions from the community to achieve its stated objectives. While this approach has been demonstrated to be successful in the last decade, certain areas have been identified where improvements can be made. The RDA TIGER project addresses some of these improvements [1].

RDA TIGER has established a suite of concrete services to support the Working and Interest Groups (WG) of the RDA. Work Package 4 in the TIGER project oversees the service for WG Output Support, including various output guidance services, and particularly the RDA Knowledge Base (RDA-KB; previously referred to as the RDA Maintenance Platform (RDA-MP – see annex K for an overview of naming scheme changes). The objectives are to ensure high quality, usefulness, maintenance, and sustainability of the WG outputs.

This report provides an assessment of progress to date with the implementation of the work plan outlined in D4.1 [4], and highlights challenges and remedies for those challenges.

The report structure mirrors that of D4.1, since we assess progress with the implementation of the solutions and remedies identified in that report with respect to the main concerns, issues, and opportunities facing RDA working group and interest group activities. 

This deliverable provides a final evaluation of the RDA TIGER project’ Output Services Work Package (WP4). It tracks progress towards the solutions and remedies identified in previous deliverables, and describes lessons learned throughout the development process. It offers descriptions and status updates on the implementation and continued improvement of the main output of WP4, the RDA Knowledge Base (RDA-KB). The RDA-KB and WP4 aims to ensure the high quality, usefulness, maintenance, and sustainability of the WG outputs.

The deliverable also provides recommendations on how the RDA-KB can be usefully adopted by the RDA community; lessons learned during the process of development; as well as how support for RDA groups can be further improved in the future. 

The report is structured in roughly three main parts: the first (current) section is an extended executive summary, including main outputs, synergies, and challenges. The second part (sections 1-3) provides more in-depth detail on the outputs created in WP4, as well as a final status update of how various priority areas identified by the project have been addressed.  Finally, the third part includes lessons learned and recommendations for future work.

The Facilitation Service is the core of the RDA TIGER services. The RDA TIGER facilitator supports WGs from initiation to finalisation phase. This document outlines the Facilitation Service, the role of the facilitator, and sets out the stages of the Working Groups (WG) that the facilitator should oversee. It also highlights the links to the other support mechanisms that will be made available to the RDA WGs. 

This deliverable is intended as an internal guidance document and will be complemented by two more updates in further deliverables (D5.2 and D5.3) which will evaluate and optimise the service based on service quality feedback from WP6.

This deliverable picks up from RDA TIGER D5.1 Definition and handbook of the Facilitation Service, documenting how the Facilitation Service for the RDA TIGER project has been implemented up to the halfway point of the project. The deliverable outlines how the anticipated stages, tasks and activities described in D5.1 have been realised in practice, and the lessons learned so far from the feedback that has been received and from those Working Groups (WGs) who have availed of the service. Particular attention is paid to the Facilitation Service stages described and detailed in D5.1; whether they have accurately predicted the type of support needed by the selected WGs and whether any additional or amended tasks are required. 

This deliverable presents the final assessment of the Facilitation Service implemented under WP5 of the RDA TIGER project. The purpose of the deliverable is to evaluate the design, implementation, outcomes, and sustainability of the Facilitation Service. The deliverable builds on earlier reports (RDA TIGER D5.1 and D5.2) and provides a standalone, summative evaluation at the end of the project. 

Responsibility for grant approval in RDA TIGER and RDA WG selection for in-kind support lies with the RDA TIGER Selection Committee. This deliverable is a guidance document that sets out the rules of participation that the Committee should follow. It describes the types of funding instruments, rules that the decision making for WGs should follow including defining the selection criteria and role of the Selection Committee. It connects strongly to the work of WP1, the RDA TIGER
Management work package in RDA TIGER who are responsible for the contractual elements
of the grants and budget coordination.

RDA TIGER provides many services for the RDA Working Groups. They are  generally new services, with relatively little initial knowledge of best practices and expectations of the WG members. It is thus critical to follow the expected quality of these services in fulfilling different aspects of the RDA TIGER project goals, including, but not limited to, the WG member satisfaction. 

This deliverable describes what is meant by quality in the RDA TIGER project, the model used to present the service and their targets, the basic quality control mechanisms used in services, and the overall quality control process of the project. This is the initial version of the process, and it is expected that the quality control mechanisms will live and evolve during the project time.

This is a report on the achievements of the RDA TIGER pilots within the first year of the project. It gives a summary of the work carried out to date to support the pilot groups with the help of the RDA TIGER facilitator, and what services have been launched and employed. Finally it highlights feedback on the different services and lessons learned and ideas for moving on and refining the services. This deliverable should serve to assist the service owners about applying the services to the new WGs which are not part of the pilot and also assist other individuals or organisations in developing facilitation and support services in their work.

This deliverable presents the steps taken to improve the value and the perceived quality of the services provided by the RDA TIGER project. 

The deliverable builds on the principles presented in RDA TIGER D6.2 ‘Initial Quality Control Processes’ and presents the concrete steps the project has taken to develop the “lightweight, but efficient methods to follow the applicability and perceived quality of the services provided”. The deliverable also summarises the feedback received after drafting the D6.3 ‘Report on Pilot Demonstrator Groups’ through formal and informal channels.

Other publications & resources

This brief guide was developed as part of the Horizon Europe-funded RDA TIGER project. Throughout the course of its lifespan, which ran for three years from 2023-2025, the project ran a total of 12 open calls for support services, travel grants and cascade grants all in support of RDA Working Groups. Key to running these calls was the efficient operation of a Selection Committee. The detailed processes for the scoping and set up of these, as well as links to the relevant documentation (evaluations forms, scoring compilation sheets, etc.) can be found in the relevant RDA TIGER project deliverables: 

The points presented below are derived from these reports and the experiences of those who managed and participated in the RDA TIGER project’s Selection Committee. They will be of use to anyone who is tasked with setting up or contributing to the operation of a Selection Committee, whether as part of a Horizon Europe-funded project or other similar initiative.

This guide is specifically tailored for facilitators, co-chairs, and community managers working with RDA (Research Data Alliance) Working Groups (WGs). Drawing on lessons from the RDA TIGER project, it provides insight into how facilitation can accelerate WG effectiveness, help navigate RDA structures, and maximise impact.

Purpose and Audience: 

Help WG co-chairs understand how facilitation practices can support their role in leading RDA Working Groups.

Support future facilitators (e.g., RDA regional initiatives like TIGRUS, or in the context of the RDA Framework for engagement with the private sector) working with RDA WGs. 

Offer practical, RDA-specific advice based on the RDA TIGER experience.

This resource provides a community-friendly overview of the Research Data Alliance (RDA) Knowledge Base, conceived and developed through the

Horizon Europe funded RDA TIGER project, specifically through Work Package 4 (details, credits?). This is intended as a sort of “start here”

familiarisation resource for RDA groups and RDA members in general.

The RDA Knowledge Base (RDA-KB) is a suite of applications and infrastructure that acts as a mechanism for the publication and cataloguing of

RDA outputs, supplementary materials, and other useful publications. In addition, it contains, or indexes other resources identified as being useful in

an RDA-related context. The RDA-KB aims to improve the quality, usefulness, and maintenance of RDA outputs, and to help users find, use, annotate,

and publish RDA-related materials. The RDA-KB also aims to support standardisation in RDA outputs and aligning these outputs with relevant policy

in Europe, e.g. EOSC. The Working Group Guidelines for instance, recommend metadata schema and RDA-specific vocabularies.

This resource provides a community-friendly overview of the Research Data Alliance (RDA) Knowledge Base, conceived and developed through the Horizon Europe funded RDA TIGER project, specifically through Work Package 4. This is intended as a sort of “start here” familiarisation resource for RDA groups and RDA members in general.

The RDA Knowledge Base (RDA-KB) is a suite of applications and infrastructure that acts as a mechanism for the publication and cataloguing of RDA outputs, supplementary materials, and other useful publications. In addition, it contains, or indexes other resources identified as being useful in an RDA-related context. The RDA-KB aims to improve the quality, usefulness, and maintenance of RDA outputs, and to help users find, use, annotate, and publish RDA-related materials. The RDA-KB also aims to support standardisation in RDA outputs and aligning these outputs with relevant policy in Europe, e.g. EOSC. The Working Group Guidelines for instance, recommend metadata schema and RDA-specific vocabularies.

The welcome pack for RDA WGs (planned or endorsed) receiving support via RDA TIGER aims to offer a comprehensive and user-friendly guide. It includes essential RDA information, important templates, and key documents supporting all RDA-related activities throughout the lifespan of WG.

It was developed as part of the RDA TIGER project, coordinated by RDA Europe. 

Partners

The project is coordinated by the RDA Association, with the Committee on Data of the International Science Council (CODATA), Netherlands eScienceCenter, and the Data Archiving and Networking Services (DANS) joining as partners. 

Get in touch

The RDA TIGER will support WGs based on application and a transparent selection process. The basic support includes the facilitation, communication, output support and landscape analysis services. Additional direct support (e.g. travel grants, third party grants) are provided by a separate application process. Details of these processes and application information are provided on a separate page.

If you are interested in finding out more, or have questions about the services, please contact the RDA TIGER team: