[Markus Stocker]

Dear Anita,
Thanks for the info and congrats on the award. Please get back to us
at your convenience.
Cheers, m.
On Wed, Sep 7, 2022 at 11:44 AM ***@***.*** via Persistent
Identification of Instruments WG

[Markus Stocker]

Hi Jonathan,
overall looks good to me, few comment on this statement: “There is a
mapping with DataCite schema (to assign a DOI to your instrument) and
ePIC This way, an instrument can be assigned with a DOI or a Handle.”
* ePIC and DataCite are two *implementations* of PIDINST schema,
DataCite requires a schema mapping and ePIC is a full PIDINST schema
implementation
* DataCite DOIs are Handles, too, and I believe ePIC IDs can be
resolved via https://doi.org.
Cheers, m.
On Fri, Jun 3, 2022 at 4:26 PM Jonathan Schaeffer via Persistent
Identification of Instruments WG

[Markus Stocker]

Hi Jonathan,
In addition to the white paper, this [1] is a relevant article, which
is, however, a bit older, but still provides context. The recent
schema publication [2] is surely also of interest. The Github repo [3]
may also be useful. Finally, in the Drive folder of past plenaries [4]
there is also presentation material that may be useful.
Cheers, m.
[1] https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2020-018
[2] https://doi.org/10.15497/RDA00070
[3] https://github.com/rdawg-pidinst/
[4] https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B2Jvjtf4IpFNZURWcC02LWpWWk0?reso…
On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 5:19 PM Jonathan Schaeffer via Persistent
Identification of Instruments WG

[Markus Stocker]

Dear all,
Agreed with Rolf, thanks for the invite Baptiste. Sven, please go
ahead with your proposal!
Cheers, m.
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 9:22 AM rolf.krahl via Persistent
Identification of Instruments WG

[Markus Stocker]

Very useful, indeed. Thanks for pointing it out, Simon. FYI, if you
wonder where the URI of the term is, as I did, it’s at the top in the
right panel, below the term name there is an IDURI switch. This
could be more prominent but otherwise the interface is a big
improvement for QUDT use.
m.
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 8:02 AM mabablue via InteroperAble
Descriptions of Observable Property Terminology WG (I-ADOPT WG)

[Markus Stocker]

Dear Nikola,
great, looking forward to meeting you on a future call!
Cheers, m.
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 2:07 PM niva via Persistent Identification of

[Markus Stocker]

Dear Nikola,
Thanks for your interest and for reaching out! Your case sounds very
interesting.
You have probably already seen this, we keep the use case descriptions here:
https://github.com/rdawg-pidinst/use-cases
In principle you can grab an existing one as a template. Feel free to
post a PR and we will review/integrate it.
Subsequently, we can see whether the current schema meets your
requirements. For this, you would ideally join a future call, which
are on first Wed every month at 2 pm UTC. I will send a reminder about
the next call next week.
Hope this helps.
Cheers, m.
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 1:26 PM niva via Persistent Identification of

[Markus Stocker]

All,
since some key people are unavailable tomorrow, let’s move the call to
next week Wed at 10 am CEST (8 am UTC).
Hope this works.
Cheers, m.
On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 11:33 AM rolf.krahl

[Markus Stocker]

Hi Rolf,
I think it is a good idea. Personally, I am a bit unclear on what days
I can be in Helsinki so there is a bit of uncertainty regarding my
presence but that shouldn’t hinder this. More importantly, we would
probably need to have this side meeting right after the plenary, in
the afternoon of the last day. I am not sure to what extent we can
control this. I worry a bit that it will be difficult to get enough
people to this event if it happens to be a day or two before the
plenary.
Cheers, m.
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 8:37 AM rolf.krahl

[Markus Stocker]

Dear Ted,
Thanks very much for the interesting and useful analysis. We will take
this on in discussions and future work. Please consider joining a
future group call (next week Wed 2 pm UTC; will send out a reminder).
Cheers, m.

[Markus Stocker]

Thanks, Rolf, for implementing the decisions we made in the call.
There are still some open issues against which some of you are tagged.
Please inform us if the recent changes address your concerns. Thanks,
all.
Cheers, m.
On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 2:11 PM rolf.krahl

[Markus Stocker]

Rolf, all,
Apologies, I forgot to update my own calendar entry after our last decision
to move this call from 6 pm to 4 pm CEST. The information in the call
announcement was correct. Thanks to your email earlier, we had a speedy
call but I think still managed to go through the agenda and fix the next
steps.
Cheers, m.
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 4:34 PM rolf.krahl
wrote:

[Markus Stocker]

Bob,
thanks for this, great analysis and very useful. Many thanks to your
colleague. I will take a closer look tomorrow. I believe we can build on
this as it seems a simple and sensible approach.
Cheers, m.

[Markus Stocker]

I obtained feedback from Lesley and she will attend P12. I will clarify the
joint session idea with her. @Jay, do you confirm that groups involved in
joint sessions won’t be given a separate group session? I agree with Jacco,
if Lesley agrees on a joint session with OD2I I suggest prioritize that
over a separate group session. But I am open to hear other opinions, pros
and cons. I guess we can submit both and then see what happens / withdraw
later.
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 3:26 PM Jay Pearlman
wrote:

[Markus Stocker]

Dear Ana,
Thanks very much for the use case description. I will read and provide
comments before the next meeting.
@All: Those of you who use a definition for instruments, can you write it
down here [1]? Thanks!
Cheers, m.
[1]
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AxeYSIA2LahvVprIDRmb0wm7U71lTiQt0n0f…

[Author]

Replies