[Romain DAVID]

Dear Nichola, dear all
I guess that some of My colleagues (Maria, Jan-Willem and/or Christian, in copy) may be interested to talk about how sensitive data is classified in a different context
It could be, for a part of the talk, a highlight of the categorisation system of EOSC-Life that should be applied in several context, and the actual limits of this system and how to improve it
A focus could also be done on legal issue in a “legal patchwork” like Europe
Your thought?
Best regards
Romain
De: “Nichola Burton via Sensitive Data Interest Group”
À: “Sensitive Data Interest Group”
Envoyé: Mercredi 30 Août 2023 05:22:22
Objet: [sensitivedata] July meeting summary and call for Plenary speakers
Hello Sensitive Data IG,
Thanks to those who attended the July community meeting, it was a fantastic discussion.
The meeting attendees agreed that for the moment we will not be recording meetings, so that attendees can talk freely about how their organizations handle sensitive data. After each meeting we will share a summary of the discussion that does not link comments to particular attendees or organizations. You can find the most recent summary attached.
At the Plenary in October we will be holding the session “Sensitive Data classifications and protocols across regions.” Two of the co-chairs will speak about this topic from an Australian perspective, but we are looking for another speaker who can talk about how sensitive data is classified in a different context – is anyone in the group interested in speaking, or suggesting a speaker?
Thanks,
Nichola
Attached files:
[ https://www.rd-alliance.org/sites/default/files/RDA%20SDIG%20Community%2… | RDA SDIG Community discussion 12_7_23.docx ]
—
Full post: https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/sensitive-data-interest-group/post/jul…
Manage my subscriptions: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist
Stop emails for this post: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/78295

[Romain DAVID]

Congrats Barbara (and all the team)!
It will be really usefull for our future work 🙂
De: “mabablue via InteroperAble Descriptions of Observable Property Terminology WG (I-ADOPT WG)”
À: ***@***.***-groups.org
Envoyé: Lundi 9 Mai 2022 18:00:37
Objet: [i-adopt] AW: I-ADOPT recommendations
Dear all,
see finally the recommendations published!
Magagna, Barbara, Moncoiffé, Gwenaëlle, Devaraju, Anusuriya, Stoica, Maria, Schindler, Sirko, Pamment, Alison, & RDA I-ADOPT WG. (2022). InteroperAble Descriptions of Observable Property Terminologies (I-ADOPT) WG Outputs and Recommendations (1.1.0). [ https://doi.org/10.15497/RDA00071 | https://doi.org/10.15497/RDA00071 ]
So happy that ours is one of 27 recommendations endorsed by RDA now.
Thank you all to make this happen.
Cheers,
Barbara
Gesendet von [ https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986 | Mail ] für Windows
Von: [ mailto:***@***.*** | Barbara Magagna ]
Gesendet: Montag, 2. Mai 2022 21:44
An: [ mailto:***@***.*** | Maria Stoica ] ; [ mailto:***@***.*** | Anusuriya Devaraju ] ; [ mailto:***@***.*** | Moncoiffe, Gwenaelle ] ; [ mailto:***@***.*** | Alison Pamment – STFC UKRI ] ; [ mailto:***@***.*** | ***@***.*** ]
Betreff: I-ADOPT recommendations
Dear all,
thanks for all for providing suggestions – Sirko and I consolidated the text and have sent it now to Bridget Walker from the RDA secretariat. See the attached document and below the text for the recommendation card:
The challenge:
Lack of a common framework to enable interoperability between diverse terminologies used to represent observable properties/variables and provide the necessary level of detail needed for seamless data discovery and integration.
The solution:
The I-ADOPT Interoperability Framework is a set of guidelines based on a simple non-domain specific ontology that supports the decomposition of complex observable properties into their essential atomic parts represented through the concepts in FAIR terminologies.
The Impact:
The I-ADOPT Interoperability Framework is a substantial contribution to enabling the interoperability of terminologies, within and across domains without sacrificing any prior efforts. It serves as a common layer of abstraction through which concepts from different terminologies can be systematically aligned and extended, as needed .
The annotation of observational data with these interoperable concepts supports the findability and reusability of datasets across repositories facilitating the federation of data systems. It represents the variables’ context and provides the level of detail needed to identify suitable datasets and to connect different datasets with related observations. The I-ADOPT Interoperability Framework will facilitate the development of tools to enable researchers to describe and find their data more systematically.
I hope you are all happy with this.
Cheers,
Barbara
[ http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_… ] Virenfrei. [ http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_… | http://www.avg.com ] [ https://webmail.erinha.eu/#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2 | ]
—
Full post: https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/interoperable-descriptions-observable-…
Manage my subscriptions: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist
Stop emails for this post: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/75686

[Romain DAVID]

Hi all
I appologize
I am off until next week
I will follow progress with the notes
best regards
Romain
De: “BrigitteMathiak via Data Granularity WG”
À: ***@***.***-groups.org
Envoyé: Mercredi 18 Août 2021 19:03:28
Objet: [data-granularity-wg] REMINDER for the meeting tomorrow
Hi everyone,
Just a quick reminder for our monthly RDA Data Granularity Meeting tomorrow, Thursday, 18 August 2021, 3pm UTC
The first as an official Working Group.
This is the agenda:
1. Introduction (for new members)
2. Chairs Update
1. Update on Case Statement (we are a working group!)
2. P18 Proposal Submitted
3. Collaboration Tools; proposal to use the following set: google drive + google jamboard + Slack
4. Reports from the subgroups
1. Constraints
2. Survey
5. Co-leads for the subgroups
6. Other Business
Hope to see you tomorrow here: [ https://us02web.zoom.us/j/84685527565?pwd=UjNnamdDR1llYzRjZ3RMczFPcC85dz09 | https://us02web.zoom.us/j/84685527565?pwd=UjNnamdDR1llYzRjZ3RMczFPcC85dz09 ]
Please let us know, if you have not received a calendar invite or have any other questions or if would like to add any agenda items.
All the best,
Brigitte Mathiak (and Reyna and Katy)
—
Full post: https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/data-granularity-wg/post/reminder-meet…
Manage my subscriptions: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist
Stop emails for this post: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/74108

[Romain DAVID]

Dear SHARC member

This is a little reminder for those of you who wish to participate in reviewing the SHARC ig – draft paper (see the previous mail below), you only have one week left to do so.
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZFYMj4g4mfr9docyKAZfa0s7OkFtx8W0Q5JO6pfVom8/edit?usp=sharing

Best regards,
Romain, Laurence and the SHARC ig FAIR criteria subgroup

> De : sharc-ig@rda-groups.org <sharc-ig@rda-groups.org> de la part de Romain_David_13 via Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) IG <sharc-ig@rda-groups.org>
> Envoyé : jeudi 19 décembre 2019 11:30
> À : Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) IG
> Objet : [sharc-ig] Please review SHARC article for Data Science Journal (deadline 13th of January)
>
> Dear RDA-SHARC member,
> As planned, we are back to invite you to review the article we’ve drafted over the last months as part of the “SHARC FAIR criteria subgroup’s work” . Your feedback would be much valuable. At this stage, please do make suggestions in the margin or in the text.
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZFYMj4g4mfr9docyKAZfa0s7OkFtx8W0Q5JO6pfVom8/edit?usp=sharing
> Note that each of the reviewers will be cited as a contributor or author (depending on their type of contribution) and that this contribution will be detailed in the article “Contribution” section.
> Further details:
>
>   *   the wished journal is Data Science Journal as part of their special call for papers (cofunded by RDA to promote RDA-ig/wg outputs)
>   *   deadline is the 13 of January, 2020; your feedback is very welcome as soon as possible
>   *   contributors Name / affiliations / contact info and ORCID will be needed
>
> Many thanks in advance for your interest in our work and for your participation.
> We will keep you informed as soon as possible of any progress on the paper.
> Looking forward to your participation,
> Romain, Laurence and the SHARC ig FAIR criteria subgroup

[Romain DAVID]

Dear colleague
Laurence and I have completed your survey in line with our SHARC FAIR criteria assesment template
(as a reminder available here:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1vloqbekIGlqiDwzE9jqZzoaoDCbwYQlx…?
)
Best regards
Romain
Romain DAVID
Ingénieur de Recherche / Reaserch Fellow
***@***.***
Tel./Phone : 04.99.61.2070
Tel. Secrétariat/Secretarial office phone : 04.99.61.24.28
INRA – Centre de recherche de Montpellier
UMR Mistea (Bâtiment 29)
2 Place Pierre Vialia
34060 Montpellier Cedex 2
France
http://www6.montpellier.inra.fr/mistea/
http://www.inra.fr/
________________________________
De : ***@***.***-groups.org de la part de ChrisB via FAIR Data Maturity Model WG
Envoyé : mercredi 2 octobre 2019 22:29
À : ***@***.***-groups.org
Objet : [fair_maturity] FAIR data maturity model WG: Prioritisation & Scoring – Invitation to contribute!
Dear members of the FAIR data maturity model Working Group,
Over the past month and a half, we have had lively and fruitful discussions about the indicators and their prioritisation. However, we have not yet reached a consensus. As a consequence, to facilitate this process, we have put together a quick survey where we solely ask your opinion about the priority of each and every current 53 indicators.
Your answers will allow us to better understand and gather all different views, but also allow us to propose a final set of priorities for the next workshop in Helsinki.
Please share with us your opinion about the prioritisation of indicators[1]. We thank you in advance for devoting 5 minutes of your time to the survey. No account nor registration is need.
As a next step towards a common set of assessment criteria, we started to explore a scoring mechanism relying on the FAIRness indicators and their prioritisation. The underlying idea is to assess and objectively score the implementation level of the FAIR principles.
We have created a thread in GitHub[2] to discuss this matter. We invite all members of the Working Group to comment on that proposal on GitHub and to suggest changes in the approach.
Also, don’t hesitate to comment on any other aspect of the work of the editorial team!
Kind regards,
The editorial team
[1] https://forms.gle/uWXpT27i2RiSei5V7
[2] https://github.com/RDA-FAIR/FAIR-data-maturity-model-WG/issues/34
Christophe Bahim
PwC | Technology Consulting | Senior Consultant
Mobile: +32 474 57 05 69
Email: ***@***.***
PwC Enterprise Advisory cvba/scrl
Firm legal information, click here
[http://www.pwc.be/en/assets/image/email/banner-pwc.gif%5D
This e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed.
If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected this e-mail,
please notify the author by replying to this e-mail. If you are not
the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, copy, print or
rely on this e-mail.
PwC may monitor outgoing and incoming e-mails and
other telecommunications on its e-mail and telecommunications systems.

[Romain DAVID]

Dear colleagues

we are sorry but we are not sure to attend the meeting due to clash with RDA France meeting.

I hope we ll be here at 17:00

Keep us in the loop, we ll contribute afterwards

Romain and Laurence

[Romain DAVID]

Dear colleagues

we are sorry but we are not sure to attend the meeting due to clash with RDA France meeting.

I hope we ll be here at 17:00

Keep us in the loop, we ll contribute afterwards

Romain and Laurence

[Romain DAVID]

 Dear RDA-SHARC members, > > Has anyone planned to attend the CODATA 2019 meeting ‘Towards > next-generation data-driven science: policies, practices and platforms’, > in Beijing, China, 19-20 September 2019? > > Anne-Cambon Thomsen will organise a session there about ‘Expert views on > evaluating data sharing efforts and practices: an international dialogue > fostered by an interest group of the research data alliance’. You are > very welcome to participate if interested. Please let us know as soon as > possible… > > Best, Laurence > > > — > Laurence Mabile, Chef de projet/Project manager > > UMR1027 Inserm – Université Paul Sabatier / Toulouse III, > Epidémiologie et analyses en santé publique. > Equipe Trajectoires d’innovations en santé : enjeux bioéthiques et impact > en santé publique > Equipe EQUITY > > Faculté de médecine > 37 allées Jules Guesde 31062 Toulouse Cedex 9, France > > Tel : +33 (0)5 61 14 56 47 > > Fax : +33 (0)5 61 14 56 23 > > E-mail : ***@***.***-tlse3.fr > > > > — > Full post: > > https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/sharing-rewards-and-credit-sharc-ig/po… > Manage my subscriptions: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist > Stop emails for this post: > https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/63323 > >

[Romain DAVID]

Dear all
Thanks a lot for this integrative work!
It is also planned to enter the SHARC criteria in github. Nice to see this
comparison work evolve so quickly!
A good occasion for us (the SHARC ig group) to remind you the ongoing
survey on SHARC criteria (#10 set of criteria)
https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/sharing-rewards-and-credit-sharc-ig/po…
Best regards
Romain
Le mer. 8 mai 2019 à 15:48, markw a écrit :

[Romain DAVID]

Thanks Mogens
I hope I’ve taken in account all remarks
The few most complicated improvements will be made before the paper
version.
Have a good week skiing!
Best regards
Romain

[Romain DAVID]

Dear all
thanks for your remarks
please find attached the corrected version of the poster
I will submit it tommorow
Best regards
Romain
SP : the summary of the poster is available here
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WgsSIL0usdoV8SZO65D8eQU2vlM1y20DRFxR…

[Romain DAVID]

Hello!
Sorry Laurence, I m late again
yes, I ll do it as soon as possible tomorow
cheers
Romain

[Author]

Replies