Skip to main content

Notice

The new RDA web platform is still being rolled out. Existing RDA members PLEASE REACTIVATE YOUR ACCOUNT using this link: https://rda-login.wicketcloud.com/users/confirmation. Please report bugs, broken links and provide your feedback using the UserSnap tool on the bottom right corner of each page. Stay updated about the web site milestones at https://www.rd-alliance.org/rda-web-platform-upcoming-features-and-functionalities/.

Metadata Needed for Curation — Cancelled

  • Creator
    Discussion
  • #134057

    Rebecca Koskela
    Participant

    Collaborative session notes: https://bit.ly/MetadataCuration
     

    Welcome & Introductions – Rebecca Koskela (5 min)

    Review Objectives of the Meeting – Keith Jeffery (9 min)

    Kevin Ashley: Digital Curation Centre – What has been done and what is yet to do (12 min)

    Peter Cornwell/Michael Hildreth – Definition of metadata elements required from the perspective of the Preserving Scientific Annotation WG (12 min)

    A Representative from CURE-FAIR WG – Definition of metadata elements required for curating for reproducible and FAIR data and code (12 min)

    Discussion on the alignment of Element Set with Metadata required for curation and preservation (30 min)

    Next Steps (10 min)

    1. First group option
    Metadata IG

    Additional links to informative material

    Metadata Interest Group: https://www.rd-alliance.org/groups/metadata-ig.html

    Metadata Elements: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B8FnM3PsoL2dd2RnYVBmcjRMYXc?usp=sharing

    RDA Metadata Principles and their Use: https://rd-alliance.org/metadata-principles-and-their-use.html

    Digital Curation Centre Disciplinary Metadata: https://www.dcc.ac.uk/guidance/standards/metadata

    Preservation tools, technologies, and policies Interest Group: https://www.rd-alliance.org/groups/preservation-tools-techniques-and-policies

    CURE-FAIR Working Group: https://www.rd-alliance.org/groups/cure-fair-wg

    Applicable Pathways
    Semantics, Ontology, Standardisation, Data Lifecycles – Versioning, Provenance, and Reward

    Avoid conflict with the following group (1)
    Preservation Tools, Techniques, and Policies

    Avoid conflict with the following group (3)
    CURE-FAIR WG

    Contact for group (email)
    rkoskela@unm.edu

    Group chair serving as contact person
    Rebecca Koskela

    I declare that I have informed the chairs of all the Working / Interest groups included in this joint meeting application.
    Acknowledged

    Meeting objectives
     In 2015 the four core RDA  metadata groups ( Metadata Standards Directory Working Group, Data In Context Interest Group, Research Data Provenance Interest Group ), coordinated by the Metadata Interest Group, worked together to create a set of principles for metadata that the groups believed RDA should adopt and promote. The third principle,
           Metadata is not just for description and discovery; it is also for contextualisation (relevance, quality, restrictions (rights, costs)) and for coupling users, software and computing resources to data (to provide a Virtual Research Environment)
    This meeting is targeted at ensuring the MIG and related groups’ work on metadata elements provides what is required for the purposes of curation.

    Please indicate the breakout slot (s) that would suit your meeting
    Breakout 2, Breakout 5, Breakout 8, Breakout 11, Breakout 14

    Privacy Policy
    1

    Target Audience

    RDA  colleagues interested in integrating/interoperating datasets as well as metadata and metadata schema specialists.

    Domain researchers and those who manage domain-specific archives.

    Those who study knowledge preservation schema and infrastructure are also welcome to share their expertise.

Log in to reply.