Skip to main content

Notice

We are in the process of rolling out a soft launch of the RDA website, which includes a new member platform. Existing RDA members PLEASE REACTIVATE YOUR ACCOUNT using this link: https://rda-login.wicketcloud.com/users/confirmation. Visitors may encounter functionality issues with group pages, navigation, missing content, broken links, etc. As you explore the new site, please provide your feedback using the UserSnap tool on the bottom right corner of each page. Thank you for your understanding and support as we work through all issues as quickly as possible. Stay updated about upcoming features and functionalities: https://www.rd-alliance.org/rda-web-platform-upcoming-features-and-functionalities/

RE: [rda-datafabric-ig] Re: [rda-datafabric-ig] Re: [rda-datafabric-ig] Re: [rda-datafabric-ig] Registries of..

  • Creator
    Discussion
  • #127663

    Keith, you articulate several important points, and the notion of trust added by John Henry is also important. Trust is also key in the initial semantic web layer cake.
    One other point to add in terms of quality is satisfying the function. In other words, quality of data, the repository structure/design, or the metadata for that matter (couldn’t resist!), depends on if it satisfies the function for which it was intended. If provenance metadata (or data), allows a human or system to correctly track the provenance, then the quality is good, or better than if it did not allow for this tracking.
    Now, of course, there are disconnects, such as bad data, good repository design… or good data, bad/poor metadata, so all these things need to fit together to meet functions. And, what do we do when functional goals change, as they do.
    Good discussion here, although a little intense to try to follow everything online.
    see folks later this week… j

Log in to reply.