[Tomasz Miksa]

Collaborative session notes: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1M3ZDU_w3w5kOYwGTwflxMlMxRi9k3g_EObIfcARPLic/edit?usp=sharing
Part 1 – Introduction for newcomers and meeting objectives (5 mins, Kevin Ashley)
Part 2 – Outcomes – old, new and potential future groups
Part 3 – Case Studies (3 x 7 mins)
Part 4 – Open discussion 

Community of Practice 

Karin Breitman (TAB) – What is a Community of Practice? (5 minutes)

Tomasz Miksa – Community of Practice on maDMPS? (3 minutes)

Feedback from the participants

What are the challenges that we can solve together?

1. First group option
Active Data Management Plans IG

3.Third group option
DMP Common Standards WG

Are you willing to hold your session at multiple times to accommodate various time zones?
Yes

Avoid conflict with the following group (1)
DMP Common Standards WG

Avoid conflict with the following group (3)
Data Citation WG

Estimate of the required room capacity
100

Group chair serving as contact person
Tomasz Miksa

I declare that I have informed the chairs of all the Working / Interest groups included in this joint meeting application.
Acknowledged

Meeting objectives
– engage with stakeholders involved in research data management in general, and data management plan interoperability in particular
– present results from the Exposing DMPs WG
– receive feedback on establishing a Community of Practice
– identify common challenges and plan future joint developments

Please indicate the breakout slot (s) that would suit your meeting
Breakout 1, Breakout 2, Breakout 3, Breakout 4, Breakout 5, Breakout 6, Breakout 7, Breakout 8, Breakout 9, Breakout 10, Breakout 11

Privacy Policy
1

Target Audience
We invite anyone with an interest in the success of research data management planning to participate. For example, please join us if you are…

a researcher – to let us know what you would hope to achieve by sharing some or all of your DMP content with your peers, potential collaborators and service providers, or concerns about the consequences of doing so

a DMP platform provider, repository, journal or other service provider – to discuss how well the maDMP standard supports the exchange of information about research projects’ data management requirements and anticipated outputs

a research funder/ policy maker – to share your expectations of how wider exposure of DMP content may improve the achievement of policy goals towards FAIR outputs

a research facilitator – to discuss the institutional support processes that DMP exposure would benefit or otherwise impact on.

No prior preparation is needed, but some familiarity with the provided links is definitely helpful.

Discussion