Skip to main content

Notice

We are in the process of rolling out a soft launch of the RDA website, which includes a new member platform. Existing RDA members PLEASE REACTIVATE YOUR ACCOUNT using this link: https://rda-login.wicketcloud.com/users/confirmation. Visitors may encounter functionality issues with group pages, navigation, missing content, broken links, etc. As you explore the new site, please provide your feedback using the UserSnap tool on the bottom right corner of each page. Thank you for your understanding and support as we work through all issues as quickly as possible. Stay updated about upcoming features and functionalities: https://www.rd-alliance.org/rda-web-platform-upcoming-features-and-functionalities/

PID Kernel Info WG 18 Dec WG call agenda

  • Creator
    Discussion
  • #112484

    Beth Plale
    Participant

    HI, 
    please join us if you are able on Mon Dec 18 (9:00 EST / 14:00 UTC / 23:00 Tokyo) to
    1. discuss the proposed  “Guiding principles for PID Kernel Information profile definition and use”   (see 27 Nov posting on wiki)
    2. discuss examples that map the strawman profile to the profile (forthcoming).
    3. discuss objectives of Plenary 11 meeting
    call coords posted earlier in separate post on wiki
    happy holidays!
    Beth and Tobias
     

  • Author
    Replies
  • #131352

    In preparation for Monday’s meeting, I’ve set up a google doc for a P11
    session:
    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BfrsbsNUX4SK8GYIvcx2sf-MgfeVkqsRGty8
    This is just a suggestion based on our current state – all comments are
    welcome.
    I also expect that there will be a separate, overarching session with
    multiple groups involved around the data fabric/dtr/KI topics, possibly
    also involving the RDA/AGU adoption initiative. Mark Parsons and/or
    Dimitris Koureas are coordinating this.
    On Monday, we should also discuss our groups’ delivery/recommendation.
    We originally intended to have a 12 month schedule, which according to
    the official endorsement puts us at delivery at P12. I’ve just checked
    what is recorded and actually, a 18 month schedule is defined for us, so
    we have one plenary more time. Given our current status and momentum, I
    think there are arguments either way, so we may also want to discuss
    this at our call. How ‘complete’ do we feel now or at P11? What is
    needed aside from profiles, guiding principles and application examples?
    Best, Tobias

Log in to reply.