Skip to main content


We are in the process of rolling out a soft launch of the RDA website, which includes a new member platform. Existing RDA members PLEASE REACTIVATE YOUR ACCOUNT using this link: Visitors may encounter functionality issues with group pages, navigation, missing content, broken links, etc. As you explore the new site, please provide your feedback using the UserSnap tool on the bottom right corner of each page. Thank you for your understanding and support as we work through all issues as quickly as possible. Stay updated about upcoming features and functionalities:

Next Call March 6, 9 am UTC

  • Author
  • #130703

    Rolf Krahl

    Dear all,
    I tried to implement the decisions from today’s meeting:
    – #1: submitted pull request #18 to add a license.
    – #4: closed the issue.
    – #5: submitted pull request #19 to amend AlternateIdentifier.
    – #6: pull request #12 to add modelName was already submitted earlier.
    – #9: closed the pull request.
    – #15: closed the issue.
    – #17: add a comment, trying to summarize today’s discussion.
    For the pull requests, I leave it to you to hit the merge button after
    proof reading.
    Please note that #12 and #19 will conflict with each other due to the
    table formatting. I’ll be happy to resolve the conflict in the second
    one after the first of the two gets merged.
    Best regards,

    Rolf Krahl
    Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie (HZB)
    Albert-Einstein-Str. 15, 12489 Berlin
    Tel.: +49 30 8062 12122

  • #130700

    Thanks, Rolf, for implementing the decisions we made in the call.
    There are still some open issues against which some of you are tagged.
    Please inform us if the recent changes address your concerns. Thanks,
    Cheers, m.
    On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 2:11 PM rolf.krahl

  • #130695

    Dear Rolf and Markus,
    sorry that I could not attend the meeting yesterday due to a collision.
    Most of my concerns are addressed with the current solution.
    But the discussion went a bit into a wrong direction due to
    misunderstanding probably caused by my lack of precision here.
    I was not talking about a serial number, which is usually an identifier
    used by manufacturers inside a series. I was talking about the
    identification of the series itself. This might be part of the string
    for model name. But for identification purposes it would be better from
    my point of view, to have an optional subfield ”seriesName’ of modelName.
    BTW. refering to the discussion about uniqueness of serial numbers: very
    often model name, series and serial number disambiguates this, but there
    is of course no guarantee.

  • #130693

    Rolf Krahl

    Dear all,
    For some issues, we decided in the meeting to leave them open for now.
    I left #5 open to give Lou an opportunity to comment whether the
    result in AlternateIdentifier addresses her concern and if she is
    happy to close. And then there are a few new ones.
    But I believe, none of the currently open issues is a show stopper to
    present the second draft schema at P13 based on what we have now and
    urgently needs to be acted upon before the plenary.
    Best regards,

    Rolf Krahl
    Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie (HZB)
    Albert-Einstein-Str. 15, 12489 Berlin
    Tel.: +49 30 8062 12122

Log in to reply.