[Shelley Stall]

0-5 Minutes (5 minutes): Welcome and introduction – Shelley 

5-15 Minutes (10 minutes): Overview of the group, achievements so far and plans for next 6 months (including hackathons) – Shelley Stall

15 – 25 (10 minutes): What does it mean to enable attribution of all members of a reliquary? Shelley Stall

25 – 45 (20 minutes) Presentation of Prototypes – Martina Stockhause (IPCC figues and attribution)  Joan Damerow (Physical Samples)

45 –  55 (10 minutes) Growing the PID graph to portray use cases  – Justin Buck

55 – 75 (20 mintues) Discussion and feedback on prototypes – Shelley Stall

75 – 85 (10 minutes): Planning the final stretch: Who is doing what and by when, Hackathon Topics and Schedule – Shelley Stall

Potential Hackathon topics:

Potential ther protypes

How do we enable attribution

Transparency and provenance of each member of reliquary

85 – 90 Minutes (5 MInutes): Closing circle – Lesley Wyborn

Additional links to informative material

International Data Week 2023: Session notes and recording

Website: https://data.agu.org/DataCitationCoP/ 

Workshop Materials and links to recordings

Agarwal, Deborah, Coward, Caroline, Stall, Shelley, & Erdmann, Christopher. (2021, April). Data Citation Community of Practice – 8 April 2021 Workshop. Zenodo. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4673622

Agarwal, Deborah, Goble, Carole, Soiland-Reyes, Stian, Sarkans, Ugis, Noesgaard, Daniel, Schindler, Uwe, Fenner, Martin, Manghi, Paolo, Stall, Shelley, Coward, Caroline, Erdmann, Chris, 2021. Data Citation Community of Practice – 8 June 2021 Workshop. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4916734

Stall, Shelley, Buck, Justin, Ayliffe, James, Stockhause, Martina, Agarwal, Deb, Coward, Caroline, & Erdmann, Chris. (2021, October 29). Data Citation Community of Practice – 29 October 2021 Workshop. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5641236

WG’s Google Drive Folder: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1Em2juiagXFQn–rDRqaojwlYSNv9djX7  

BoF ”Complex Data Citations: Formulating a Community Recommendation“ on RDA-19

Applicable Pathways
The FAIR Agenda, Data Lifecycles – Versioning, Provenance, and Reward

Avoid conflict with the following group (1)
PID IG

Brief introduction describing the activities and scope of the group
Brief introduction describing the activities and scope of the group *

Starting in December 2020 during a Data FAIR Town Hall at AGU’s Fall meeting we reached out across the community for interest in supporting virtual working sessions that would lead to recommendations, adoption, and a better of citing large numbers of data/digital objects in journal articles and other publications. 

During 2021 we held three large working sessions as well as smaller group development efforts, which are documented at. https://data.agu.org/DataCitationCoP/

The discussion was continued at a BoF at RDA-19: the BoF “Complex Data Citations: Formulating a Community Recommendation” session, which led to the formation of the Working Group.

Group chair serving as contact person
Shelley Stall

I Understand a Chair Must be Present at the Event to Hold the Breakout Session
Yes

Meeting objectives
The group has identified a citation problem, sought use cases which seek to address complex citations and worked on potential solutions. In sharing existing pilots that attempt to address the problem of complex citations as the complex citation working group seek to share their progress on the proposed solutions based on their use cases and identify the benefits and shortfalls of the solutions as the group looks towards providing recommendations. The group will offer additional use cases beyond the existing examples and identifying landmarks for the remaining working group lifetime.

Please indicate at least (3) three breakout slots that would suit your meeting.
Breakout 11, Breakout 14, Breakout 17

Privacy Policy
1

Discussion