[Esther DZALE YEUMO]

Dear Sophie,
this is a nice and rich poster. Please feel free to consider these
suggestions:
1. maybe highlight the “why” as you did for the issues and the
solutions. We can guess more or less some purposes from the picture
(more interdisciplinarity, reproducibility of science, more services for
end users such as breeders, farmers, decision makers, etc.) but it might
not be obvious for everyone.
2. add PIDs in the list of solutions as they play a key role in
desambiguisation
3. maybe also add documentation in addition to ontologies in the list of
solutions. By documentation, I mean metadata, articles and whatever
other document. This is to echo an explaination François Tardieu
explaining during the PhenoHarmonis workshop that in the context of high
throughput phenotyping, a huge number of environmental variables are
beeing generated continuously. And while it is very important to include
them into ontologies, it might not always be possible to do it timely
because ontologies construction and updating are quite time consuming
and hard. But you maybe not mean to be exhaustive here.
Esther

Discussion