Submitted by Katherine McNeill
Welcome additional participants interested in working on this topic
Update on the DDPIG task force progress
Review and obtain feedback on a draft case statement for a WG
Identify intersections with other RDA groups so that the proposed WG can:
Collaborative Notes Link: https://docs.google.com/document/d/144cs_Qph5GrqmgJpTzmg2kjtn7-MnDXw7smc...
Introduction: why we need to study data granularity from the user perspective
Presenting the current work of the Data Discovery Paradigms IG Granularity TF which considers factors such as access, discovery, interoperability, citation/credit. This will include some illustrative use cases to articulate the concepts.
Introductions among participants
Presenting the case statement for a WG (we encourage participants to review ahead of time and bring their feedback and questions)
Feedback on the case statement
What resources would be required for WG activities (e.g., a study such as a survey)
Additional needs or use cases
With whom (e.g., research groups, data repositories) we should partner
Connections with other RDA WGs/IGs (such as the Data Versioning WG, etc)
Wrap-up, next actions for the group
Short introduction describing any previous activities:
A BoF was conducted at P15 (see session notes). Since then, the Data Granularity Task Force, a TF of the Data Discovery Paradigms IG, has been meeting regularly on a monthly basis to refine the directions for a case statement, and to better understand the existing needs and landscape for data granularity practices.
BoF chair serving as contact person:
Additional links to informative material:
This is going to be an informative discussion, so material is expected to be collected during the session. Working document of the task force to be shared: Draft Case Statement for WG
Recommend literature to consider may include:
Are you willing to host a live second session to accommodate a different time zone? :
Main presenters: Reyna Jenkyns, Katherine McNeill, Fotis Psompouous. Other members of the task force may be invited to present particular use cases.
How do you prefer to hold the virtual component of your session?:
Avoid conflict with the following group (1):
Avoid conflict with the following group (2):
Avoid conflict with the following group (3):