There is no such content in this group
Posts
20
July
2020
Next meeting 21 July 2020 0800UTC
Dear All, A reminder that our next regular meeting is on 21 July 2020 at 0800UTC. On the agenda are 2 main items: - discuss open issues related to Task 3 (Derive use case requirements) - start planning Task 4 (Analyse semantic representation of Observable Properties against requirements) There will also be an option to stay for an extra half-hour after the meeting to contribute to a paper led by Barbara.0 | Add new comment
13
July
2020
AW: [i-adopt] QUDT VOCAB Quantity Kinds Release 2.1 Editor
Thanks Simon! This really looks cool! Is there any manual how one can really make use of it? Or any publication one could read about the background and improvements done? Barbara Gesendet von Mail für Windows 10 Von: simon.cox via InteroperAble Descriptions of Observable Property Terminology WG (I-ADOPT WG) Gesendet: Montag, 13. Juli 2020 03:08 An: ***@***.***-groups.org1 | Add new comment
13
July
2020
QUDT VOCAB Quantity Kinds Release 2.1 Editor
by Simon Cox
The QUDT project has released a UI (based on the TopBraid tech stack) that supports better browsing. This one strongly overlaps with the goals of I-ADOPT: http://qudt.org/edg/tbl/qudt_quantity_kinds.editor John, Carlos, Lewis - this platform looks something like COR? Simon0 | Add new comment
01
July
2020
next regular WG meeting tomorrow
Dear All, Our next call is tomorrow 2nd July 2020 at 1600UTC. Register in advance for this meeting if you have not already done so: https://ukri.zoom.us/meeting/register/tJ0rcumhpz4qH9CRywHr3WxRKMxM-Bf-n4fg0 | Add new comment
22
June
2020
I-ADOPT WG meeting on 23 June 2020
Dear All, A reminder that we have a group meeting tomorrow at 0800UTC rescheduled from last week. We will be mainly focusing on the terminology requirements in support of our 15 UCs. Please see https://github.com/i-adopt/requirements/issues/22 for details on how to contribute. The next meeting will be next week on 2nd July 1600UTC If you haven't already done so, here is the link to register in advance for this meeting:0 | Add new comment
15
June
2020
tomorrow's i-adopt meeting postponed
Dear All, Due to an unexpected clash of time, we had to postpone tomorrow's meeting to Tuesday next week (23rd June), same time. You will not have to register again if you have already done so. You can reuse the same connection. If you have never registered for our Tuesdays' meetings, you can do so here: Register in advance for this meeting: https://ukri.zoom.us/meeting/register/tJwudeuqpj4sEtC0388RXlu6oAtEYiJj5jwg Our apologies for this last minute change.0 | Add new comment
11
June
2020
Virtual Plenary 16 Call for Sessions and RDA Adoption Week
Dear InteroperAble Descriptions of Observable Property Terminology WG (I-ADOPT WG) members, There are two important announcements from RDA being circulated that we wanted to bring to your attention in the case you missed it this week.0 | Add new comment
07
June
2020
Key terminology requirements versus User Cases
Dear All, Following an action on me at our last meeting to start building a matrix of terminology requirements vs user cases, please find the details in this Github ticket: https://github.com/i-adopt/requirements/issues/22 I hope that many of you will be able to contribute. Any questions please add a comment to the issue or email me directly. Kind regards, Gwen.0 | Add new comment
04
June
2020
Telco today at 18:00 CET
Dear all, we meet today at 18:00 CET and our topic is once again requirements. See you soon! Best regards, Barbara You are invited to a Zoom meeting. When: May 7, 2020 05:00 PM London Register in advance for this meeting: https://ukri.zoom.us/meeting/register/tJ0rcumhpz4qH9CRywHr3WxRKMxM-Bf-n4fg After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the meeting. Gesendet von Mail für Windows 101 | Add new comment
28
May
2020
Which is the best way to represent ontological terms representing observation types of a measuredVariable? · Issue #27 · ESIPFed/science-on-schema.org
by Simon Cox
I can’t recall if this thread from science-on-schema.org had been canvassed in this group: https://github.com/ESIPFed/science-on-schema.org/issues/27 Appears to be barking up the same tree.0 | Add new comment