There is no such content in this group
Posts
12
April
2019
next telconference
Dear all, we have now closed the poll and this is the result: We will meet twice a month: * first week of the month: European/American friendly Thursday 18.00 CEST, Vienna (9:00 PDT, San Francisco) * third week of the month: European/Australian friendly Tuesday 9:00 CEST (Monday 18:00 AEDT, Melbourne) Vienna So next time we will meet Tuesday 16th April at 9:00 CEST (Monday 15th April 18:00 AEDT, Melbourne). Please use the connection links below.4 | Add new comment
11
April
2019
Interoperability of observable properties description - meeting days
Dear all, This is a gentle reminder for checking the doodles below to choose the meeting days for our teleconferences, I will close them by tomorrow noon. The meeting time was already fixed by me, just the day(s) have to be selected. Unfortunately I mixed up the descriptions of the doodles (indicating wrong times), but I have corrected this early this week. So I invite everybody to check whether these days indicated by you are still valid. We meet twice a month:0 | Add new comment
03
April
2019
let's choose meeting days
Dear all, today at 14.30-16.00 in Phildadelphia (20.30-22.00 CEST) will be held the BoF session of Interoperability of observable properties descriptions WG, which can be attended also remotely (https://www.rd-alliance.org/p13-gotomeeting-commonwealth-a2). After the BoF we will meet twice a month (first and third week of the month), the week days have to be chosen via doodle.0 | Add new comment
01
April
2019
BoF session Harmonizing FAIR descriptions of observational data Wednesday 3 April 14:30-16:00 Philadelphia
Dear all, We will soon have the BoF session of our prospective Working Group with the new title: Interoperability of observable properties description WG. Check the agenda here: https://rd-alliance.org/bof-harmonizing-fair-descriptions-observational-...0 | Add new comment
20
March
2019
New title for the prospective WG
Dear all, I got feedback from 20 members of the group and there is a clear preference to select this new title for the group (8 votes for it, others had 5 or less hits): Interoperability of Observable Property Descriptions WG I am personally happy with this title as it really matches with the scope: we will concentrate on observable properties and won't tackle methods or units in the first Working Group. Best regards, Barbara Barbara Magagna, DI Ecosystem Research & Environmental Information Management0 | Add new comment
16
March
2019
New poll link for deciding upon the title of the WG
Hi again, while I got already 9 votes, some of you provided still title ideas which I don‘t want to ignore. It does not make it easier though for finding the right title, but I never supposed that this process would be easy, and this shows that this will be hard for many issues throughout the WG. But for me it is important that we come to a common ground of understanding and acceptance and this starts with the title which is part of the identity of the group. To sum up, discussing about an issue takes time and brings up new suggestions and that is good.0 | Add new comment
14
March
2019
New title for our prospective WG
Dear all, could you please use this doodle to vote for the best title of our WG till 18th March at latest: https://doodle.com/poll/qguek6wxzbmb6qae Be aware that this is a hidden poll. You should please provide up to three possible hits. Happy voting! Best, Barbara ________________________________ Von: barbara.magagna=***@***.***-groups.org <***@***.***-groups.org> im Auftrag von mabablue <***@***.***>0 | Add new comment
07
March
2019
AW: [harmonizing-fair] New title for our prospective Working Group
Dear Barbara, dear all, just my humble opinion on this …0 | Add new comment
07
March
2019
New title for our prospective Working Group
Dear all, We are looking for a better title for our prospective Working Group: I collect ideas till 14th March: Existing title: Harmonzing FAIR descriptions of observational data Some remarks I got about the title: Harmonizing FAIR descriptions – seems not correct, not all approaches are already FAIR Descriptions – could be misleading Observational data – not sure if measurements are here included These are the suggestions I got so far: * Descriptor Interoperability Group * Variable Interoperability Group0 | Add new comment
05
March
2019
AW: [harmonizing-fair] Telco: Harmonze FAIR descriptions of observational data today...
Hi to all, yes I will do this. But probably we have to find another Meeting time, because Simon Cox wants to join us in future… might be 21:00 CET the only hour where everybody could meet from the globus? But we will discuss this today Barbara Gesendet von Mail für Windows 10 Von: John Graybeal Gesendet: Dienstag, 5. März 2019 16:47 An: lucia.mona0 | Add new comment