There is no such content in this group

Posts

13
June
2019

FAIR data maturity model WG - Workshop #3 Connection Details

by Christophe Bahim

Dear members of the RDA FAIR Data Maturity Model Working Group,
0 | Add new comment
12
June
2019

Reminder for online meeting, 18 June 2019

by Keith Russell

Dear members of the RDA FAIR Data Maturity Model Working Group, This is a reminder for the next online meeting of the Working Group will take place on 18 June 2019, as usual in two sessions, the first at 0700UTC (local times ) and the second at 1500UTC (local times ). In the call, we intend to discuss the interim results of the collaborative work on the Google spreadsheet
6 | Add new comment
27
May
2019

Reminder for contributions to the collaborative document

by Keith Russell

Dear members of the RDA FAIR Data Maturity Model Working Group, As we are getting nearer to the next online meeting on 18 June 2019, we’d like to remind the members of the group that contributions to the collaborative document at [1] are open until the 31st of May 2019. Following requests from the community, we have now added a section in the document under the heading “Choices Beyond FAIR” [2] where you can propose indicators and maturity levels for aspects that are not explicitly included
1 | Add new comment
27
May
2019

Analysis of existing assessment tools as an RDA supporting output

by Keith Russell

Hi members of the RDA FAIR maturity working group, We have now published the results of an Analysis of Existing FAIR Assessment Tools on the RDA website as a supporting output of the working group. This will be open for comment more broadly also beyond the working group. https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/fair-data-maturity-model-wg/outcomes/r... The work can be referenced, we are just finalising the citation.
1 | Add new comment
24
May
2019

RDA Plenary 14th in Finland: Registration is Open and other Details!

by Julie Arteza

Dear members of the FAIR Data Maturity Model Working Group, Registration for RDA Plenary14 is now open!
0 | Add new comment
23
May
2019

Extensive list of FAIRness evaluation criteria from SHARC- Re: [fair_maturity]

by Laurence Mabile

Dear colleague, Many thanks for your fantastic work! Following your invitation to contribute, we would like to share the extensive list of Fairness criteria we have identified so far as part of the RDA-SHARC's work. But we are a bit confused on how to do that on your document here . *So find our list of criteria there:* https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1vloqbekIGlqiDwzE9jqZzoaoDCbwYQlx...
1 | Add new comment
08
May
2019

Message to FAIR WG

by Edit Herczog

Dear members of the RDA FAIR Data Maturity Model Working Group! We would like to make you aware that we have published a revised version of the report of the meeting of the WG in Philadelphia, with several people added to the attendance list. You can find the revised report at [1]. As you all know, we are currently soliciting contributions from the Working Group in the collaborative worksheet at [2]. We are happy to report that there are now 44 indicators with proposed maturity levels in the worksheet.
2 | Add new comment
22
April
2019

Re: [fair_maturity] Workshop #2 Report

by Maggie Hellström

Keith, thank you very much for sharing your thoughts! I very much agree with most of your points, especially those regarding the need to set up and sustainably operate the necessary infrastructures for curation and storage, both for data and the associated metadata. However, there are two areas where my views might be somewhat differing from what you outlined:
4 | Add new comment
19
April
2019

Google spreadsheet for your contributions

by Makx Dekkers

Dear members of the RDA FAIR Data Maturity Model Working Group, As announced earlier this week, we have created a Google spreadsheet [1] to support the further work of the Working Group in developing the core assessment criteria. This spreadsheet includes four worksheets: 1. Introduction, with an overview of context, objective and approach 2. Landscaping exercise, with the results of the initial analysis of existing approaches 3. Development, with sections for each of the principles where you can enter
3 | Add new comment

Pages