Group Mailing list Archive

09 Aug 2019

Proposal for prioritisation of the indicators

Dear members of the FAIR data maturity model Working Group,
As a next step towards a common set of core assessment criteria, we started
to explore the prioritisation of the FAIRness indicators.
The idea is that the indicators that we have developed over the last months,
with the help of many members of the Working Group, do not all have the same
priority. Some may be more important than others in evaluating FAIRness.
Some may be considered essential, some should be met if possible and others
may be nice-to-have.

06 Aug 2019

Invitation: FAIR data maturity model WG - Workshop #4 (Online meeting 2) @ Thu Sep 12, 2019 5pm - 6:30pm (CEST) (fair_maturity@rda-groups.org)

You have been invited to the following event.
Title: FAIR data maturity model WG - Workshop #4 (Online meeting 2)
Description:Dear members of the RDA FAIR Data Maturity Model Working
Group,As unveiled during the third workshop, we have scheduled a set of two
online meetings for the fourth workshop: On Thursday 12 September 2019 at
07:00 UTCOn Thursday 12 September 2019 at 15:00 UTCPlease feel free to join
any of the two (or both) online meetings. The tentative agenda is as
follows:  Welcome, objectives of the meetingRound tableState of

06 Aug 2019

Invitation: FAIR data maturity model WG - Workshop #4 (Online meeting 1) @ Thu Sep 12, 2019 9am - 10:30am (CEST) (fair_maturity@rda-groups.org)

You have been invited to the following event.
Title: FAIR data maturity model WG - Workshop #4 (Online meeting 1)
Dear members of the RDA FAIR Data Maturity Model Working Group,As unveiled
during the third workshop, we have scheduled a set of two online meetings
for the fourth workshop: On Thursday 12 September 2019 at 07:00 UTCOn
Thursday 12 September 2019 at 15:00 UTCPlease feel free to join any of the
two (or both) online meetings. The tentative agenda is as follows:
Welcome, objectives of the meetingRound tableState of play Development

02 Aug 2019

New set of indicators for the FAIR Data Maturity Model

Dear members of the FAIR Data Maturity Model Working Group,
The editorial team is pleased to announce a new version of the indicators,
based on the feedback received on GitHub.
We have made changes to the wording of the indicators, including an
indication whether they apply to metadata or to data, and also additional
text to make the connection to the principle clearer.
The 50 indicators that we currently have are the following:
F
F1
F1-01M
Metadata is identified by a persistent identifier
F1
F1-02M

15 Jul 2019

Status of discussions 2019-07-15

Dear WG,
Based on the discussion at the last online meeting on 18 June, we revised
some of the indicators that were presented at the meeting, in several cases
duplicating indicators for metadata and data as was suggested. The new
indicators have been published in the related GitHub issues at
https://github.com/RDA-FAIR/FAIR-data-maturity-model-WG/issues. Please
review them and provide any feedback you may have, preferably as a comment
in the GitHub issue.

03 Jul 2019

FAIR Data Maturity Model indicators

Dear all,
I would like to draw your attention to discussion on the indicators that is
taking place on GitHub at
https://github.com/RDA-FAIR/FAIR-data-maturity-model-WG/issues. There are
currently a few members of the group engaged in these discussion and we
would welcome wider participation.
In particular, there is discussion on the following issues:

27 Jun 2019

FAIR data maturity model WG: we need your contribution!

Dear members of the FAIR data maturity model Working Group,
As mentioned during the third workshop, we would like you to provide
feedback to the proposals (i.e. indicators and their maturity levels)
presented on GitHub [1], if at all possible, *by the 30th June 2019*. As
you may have noticed in the workshop report [2], comments and suggestions
made at the meeting are listed under the principle to which they relate. In
order to take things further, the editorial team proposed resolutions,
where appropriate.

Pages