There is no such content in this group
Posts
20
December
2017
RE: [datadiscovery] Re: [datadiscovery] The RDA Data Discovery interest Group:...
That is something that NOAA has implemented (and found it to be startlingly effective), with their oceanic and climate data. Jeff DLB could tell you if what they did is actually relevant to this topic and whether there might be someone at NOAA interested in this proposed task force. jennie - Show quoted text -From: sjskhalsa [mailto:***@***.***] Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2017 10:22 AM To: Dewaard, Anita (ELS-HBE) <***@***.***>; Pete McQuilton5 | Add new comment
19
December
2017
Re: [datadiscovery] The RDA Data Discovery interest Group: Looking back and...
Hi all, Thanks SiriJodha for the Earthcube link, the documentation looks very comprehensive. I'd like to add another link if I may, for the bioschemas initiative (http://bioschemas.org), which aims to improve data interoperability in the life sciences, through schema.org and 'bioschema' extensions, where necessary. Cheers, Pete FAIRsharing.org2 | Add new comment
12
December
2017
RE: [datadiscovery] The RDA Data Discovery interest Group: Looking back and...
Dear Kerstin, Thank you very much for your interest and enthusiasm; indeed, discussing granularity and domain-specific / cross-domain issues is an important aspect of Data Discovery and a great concept for a Task Force. Would you be interested in leading such a Task Force? If so, what would be your general plan of action (i.e. the particular objectives and expected outcomes) for the TF? Regards, Fotis0 | Add new comment
01
December
2017
The RDA Data Discovery interest Group: Looking back and looking ahead
Greetings, members of the Data Discovery Paradigms Interest Group! We want to make sure we get this message out to you as the end of 2017 comes into view, to let you know of the developments we’ve been working on, as well as new opportunities for 2018. In particular, we are interested in your thoughts on forming and joining a new set of Task Forces (see point 3), before the end of the year. But first, here’s what we’ve been up to! 1. Meetings. 1. RDA P10:2 | Add new comment
03
November
2017
Re: [datadiscovery] UTC 8pm, Tuesday 2 Nov.: A kickoff discussion with Dr....
Dear Ming, Thanks so much for recording and posting the presentation. Helping repositories make their datasets more discoverable and useful has been a primary goal of the DDPIG since its inception, and use of schema.org markup is mentioned in Recommendation 9 of our Best Practices for Data Repositories: "Make records easily indexed and searchable by major web search engines". I interpreted Natasha's suggestion regarding the focus a new DDPIG group that it should work with the schema.org community on1 | Add new comment
26
October
2017
Re: [datadiscovery] UTC 8pm, Tuesday 2 Nov.: A kickoff discussion with Dr....
by Mingfang Wu
Hi Jennie, Please go ahead to share the meeting ID with your colleagues. To All: Sorry, I didn't make it clear about the meeting agenda in my last email. Here it is: * Natasha: Data search at Google and Google's guideline for data repositories (~15-20 mins) * All: Q&A and group discussion (~30 mins) * All: Discussion of starting a new task force within the RDA Data Discovery Paradigm IG (~10 mins) Regards, Ming0 | Add new comment
26
October
2017
UTC 8pm, Tuesday 2 Nov.: A kickoff discussion with Dr. Natasha Noy from Google on making data discoverable by web search engines
by Mingfang Wu
Dear All, I am glad to inform you that Dr. Natasha Noy from Research at Google has accepted our invitation to introduce us the effort Google has put into data discovery and Google's guidelines for data repositories to make data more easily discoverable by web search engines. You may recall that our Best Practices Task Force has drafted a white paper2 | Add new comment
04
September
2017
Reminder: Relevancy Ranking TF meeting: 5 Sept. at 11am UTC
by Mingfang Wu
Dear All, The next relevancy ranking TF meeting is on 5th Sept. at 11am UTC. We sent a survey to collect information about current practices of data repositories in setting up data search services. As of on 1st Sept., we got 114 responses, 20 out of 114 are incomplete ones. A preliminary summary of 94 complete responses is available here . More analyses on possible correlations will be discussed. Regards, Ming ------------------------------- Here is the information for joining the meeting.0 | Add new comment
16
August
2017
Re: [datadiscovery] Interesting Article on Data Discovery
This might be an interesting read for this group: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00799-017-0227-5 International Journal on Digital Libraries, pp 1–16 Extracting discourse elements and annotating scientific documents using the SciAnnotDoc model: a use case in gender documents Authors Hélène de Ribaupierre, Gilles Falquet Abstract0 | Add new comment
14
August
2017
Meeting Reminder: 11am UTC, 15 August, for the RDA DDPIG Relevancy Ranking TF
by Mingfang Wu
Dear All, This is a gentle reminder that our next meeting for the Relevancy Ranking TF is on 15 August, 11am UTC. So far, we have 92 responses to the survey . In this meeting, we will look at ways to summarise and report survey responses. Hope you can join us. You are also welcome to table any relevancy ranking related issues for discussion. Regards, Ming PS: Information for joining the meeting:0 | Add new comment