There is no such content in this group
Posts
25
March
2019
14
March
2019
Reminder: 14 March (8pm UTC), RDA DDP Schemas TF meeting
by Mingfang Wu
Dear Members of the RDA DDP IG and ESIP- semanticweb, This is a reminder we have a schemas TF meeting at 8pm UTC (1pm PDT/9pm CET/7am AEST) 14th of March. Sorry for the late notice, and cross-posting. Here is the agenda: * Discuss how to analysis the survey : Current practices in using schemas to describe research datasets. * Discuss the schemas BoF session1 | Add new comment
13
March
2019
Re: Update on data/metadata granularity TF (RDA Data Discovery Paradigms IG)
Hi Chris, I think we are still wrestling a little with the definitions so that we can have a common interpretation, although we made a little headway. It's true that the word is borrowed from the physical world, so that's interesting to think about more. I come from a mathematical background too, so I do appreciate the abstractions although we still need to anchor ourselves somehow. There is always a danger in extending the meaning of a term though. [http://www.oceannetworks.ca/img/onc-email-octopus.jpg]0 | Add new comment
12
March
2019
Data/Metadata Granularity Task Force
Hi all, last week we had a very interesting discussion in the Data/Metadata Granularity Task Force call. The agenda focused mainly on discussing the dimension of data/metadata granularity, as stated here0 | Add new comment
01
March
2019
Re: Update on data/metadata granularity TF (RDA Data Discovery Paradigms IG)
Dear all, thank you for indicating your availability on the doodle poll. Ultimately, the most convenient day/time for all involved is the following: - *March 7th, 2019 at 20:00 UTC* The connection details are available below. The agenda of the call will involve a discussion on the dimension of data/metadata granularity, as currently captured in this document: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BMeHLojeEnRkgNMknATmM5bg07KDqUWE_p6h....0 | Add new comment
27
February
2019
Survey on current practices in using schemas to describe research datasets
by Mingfang Wu
Dear Members of the RDA DDP IG and ESIP- semanticweb, I am writing to invite you to participate in a survey. *As you may be aware, there is widespread and growing use of metadata schemas such as schema.org to describe research data, add structured metadata to landing pages so that they can be indexed by, and searchable through web search engines. If you have adopted or extended metadata schema in some way, have undertaken a crosswalk from a metadata schema to Schema.org, or have conducted preliminary exploration of0 | Add new comment
15
February
2019
Brief notes from Feb. 14 meeting, RDA Schemas for Research Data TF
by Mingfang Wu
Dear members of RDA datadiscovery and esip-semanticweb groups: A few of us joined today's meeting call. Here is brief notes0 | Add new comment
14
February
2019
RE: Schema.org extension for (geo)sciences
by Simon Cox
Ø we have also found the need for defining more cross-cutting types such as LabProtocol and Sample You might also take a look at the W3C Semantic Sensor Network ontology - https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-ssn/ which has classes for `Procedure` and `Sample` (continuant) as well as `Sampling` (occurrent) https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-ssn/#SOSAProcedure https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-ssn/#SOSASample0 | Add new comment
13
February
2019
Re: Schema.org extension for (geo)sciences
Hi Alasdair, Thanks for connecting the dots. I’m glad we are coming together on this. From the ESIP Semantic Technologies side, this was our intention for this coming 6 months. I want to state that Adam Shepherd and Doug Fils have spearheaded the science-on-schema.org work through their hard work. It is looking great but needs to be reviewed by a wide community. Some more responses inline… The science-on-schema.org documentation is really nice, and very easy to follow.0 | Add new comment
13
February
2019
Re: Schema.org extension for (geo)sciences
Dear Lewis, All (I’ve added the Bioschemas and RDA data discovery public mailing lists in CC) The science-on-schema.org documentation is really nice, and very easy to follow. https://github.com/ESIPFed/science-on-schema.org I see that your emphasis is on providing documentation on how to use schema.org to markup scientific datasets. Are you aware of the RDA datadiscovery working group?0 | Add new comment