There is no such content in this group
Posts
02
May
2019
Re: Reminder for the data/metadata granularity TF call (RDA Data Discovery Paradigms IG)
by Anna Milan
Hi All, Apologies for missing the meeting this afternoon. My NCEI colleague, Heather Brown, and I submitted an abstract for a workshop session at the ESIP Summer Conference. The focus will be on defining the different 'facets' of a collection based on different use cases. I hope that folks on this group can be involved with this session if it's accepted. Cheers, Anna *~~~~~~Metadata Adds Meaning~~~~~~* ***@***.***, 303-497-5099 NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information2 | Add new comment
31
March
2019
Metadata Joint Meeting at RDA P13
*Joint Session Metadata IG, Metadata Standards Catalog WG, Data in Context IG* *Thursday, April 5, 2019* *Breakout 8 1100-1230 EDT* *Collaborative session notes*: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1L9SSdtug7JDBFJZF4Bsgeuv40E8wvQCxMqWm... *Short introduction describing the scope of the groups and if any previous activities* The Metadata Interest Group serves as an umbrella group for all aspects of0 | Add new comment
25
March
2019
14
March
2019
Reminder: 14 March (8pm UTC), RDA DDP Schemas TF meeting
by Mingfang Wu
Dear Members of the RDA DDP IG and ESIP- semanticweb, This is a reminder we have a schemas TF meeting at 8pm UTC (1pm PDT/9pm CET/7am AEST) 14th of March. Sorry for the late notice, and cross-posting. Here is the agenda: * Discuss how to analysis the survey : Current practices in using schemas to describe research datasets. * Discuss the schemas BoF session1 | Add new comment
13
March
2019
Re: Update on data/metadata granularity TF (RDA Data Discovery Paradigms IG)
Hi Chris, I think we are still wrestling a little with the definitions so that we can have a common interpretation, although we made a little headway. It's true that the word is borrowed from the physical world, so that's interesting to think about more. I come from a mathematical background too, so I do appreciate the abstractions although we still need to anchor ourselves somehow. There is always a danger in extending the meaning of a term though. [http://www.oceannetworks.ca/img/onc-email-octopus.jpg]0 | Add new comment
12
March
2019
Data/Metadata Granularity Task Force
Hi all, last week we had a very interesting discussion in the Data/Metadata Granularity Task Force call. The agenda focused mainly on discussing the dimension of data/metadata granularity, as stated here0 | Add new comment
01
March
2019
Re: Update on data/metadata granularity TF (RDA Data Discovery Paradigms IG)
Dear all, thank you for indicating your availability on the doodle poll. Ultimately, the most convenient day/time for all involved is the following: - *March 7th, 2019 at 20:00 UTC* The connection details are available below. The agenda of the call will involve a discussion on the dimension of data/metadata granularity, as currently captured in this document: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BMeHLojeEnRkgNMknATmM5bg07KDqUWE_p6h....0 | Add new comment
27
February
2019
Survey on current practices in using schemas to describe research datasets
by Mingfang Wu
Dear Members of the RDA DDP IG and ESIP- semanticweb, I am writing to invite you to participate in a survey. *As you may be aware, there is widespread and growing use of metadata schemas such as schema.org to describe research data, add structured metadata to landing pages so that they can be indexed by, and searchable through web search engines. If you have adopted or extended metadata schema in some way, have undertaken a crosswalk from a metadata schema to Schema.org, or have conducted preliminary exploration of0 | Add new comment
15
February
2019
Brief notes from Feb. 14 meeting, RDA Schemas for Research Data TF
by Mingfang Wu
Dear members of RDA datadiscovery and esip-semanticweb groups: A few of us joined today's meeting call. Here is brief notes0 | Add new comment
14
February
2019
RE: Schema.org extension for (geo)sciences
by Simon Cox
Ø we have also found the need for defining more cross-cutting types such as LabProtocol and Sample You might also take a look at the W3C Semantic Sensor Network ontology - https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-ssn/ which has classes for `Procedure` and `Sample` (continuant) as well as `Sampling` (occurrent) https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-ssn/#SOSAProcedure https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-ssn/#SOSASample0 | Add new comment