Recent Activity: FAIRSharing Registry: connecting data policies, standards & databases WG

29 Aug 2019

RDA 14th plenary - Updated notification of acceptance for plenary sessions

Dear all, we would like to inform you that the session 

The challenging FAIRisation route: how could assessment help?

has been moved from breakout 8 to breakout 6 (25th October - Day 3 - 09:00, 10:30) as there was a clash identified with the original scheduling.

We look forward to seeing you in Helsinki!
Regards,
RDA Secretariat
 

02 Jul 2019

Re: [rda-fairsharing-wg][rda-data-policy-standardisation-ig] Request: Biomedical Data License review

Sending also to this lists which I think is relevant.
S.
___________________________
ONE WEEK TO GO, DEADLINE 8 JULY! Call for Presentations and Posters: CODATA 2019 Beijing
REGISTRATION OPEN: CODATA 2019 Beijing , Towards next-generation data-driven science: policies, practices and platforms, 19-20 September
June 2019 Publications in the CODATA Data Science Journal
Stay in touch with CODATA:
Stay up to date with CODATA activities: join the CODATA International News list

25 Jun 2019

Request: Biomedical Data License review

Dear RDA community,

On behalf of one of my colleagues at NTNU (The Norwegian University of Science and Technology), I would like to ask for feedback on a draft for a Biomedical Data License which is coordinated by HUNT data center https://www.ntnu.edu/mh/huntcloud/. See below for the full request.

I am a new member of RDA, and I do apologize if these groups are not the most suitable. Any suggestions of other groups or communities (also outside RDA) that would be relevant to contact are highly appreciated.

15 May 2019

FAIRsharing WG output is now an RDA recommendation

Dear RDA colleagues,
On behalf of my co-chairs and I, it is with great pleasure that I am able to announce that the FAIRsharing joint RDA/Force11 WG output has been fully recommended by the RDA.
The output from this WG is now among the 12 RDA “flagship” Outputs (full list at: https://tinyurl.com/RDArecommendations), which are the official, endorsed results of the groups, substantiated by community adoption and use.

03 Apr 2019

RDA FAIRsharing WG output and adoption: FAIRer Resources for FAIRer Data

Dear RDA colleagues,
Today, in an open access /Nature Biotechnology/ article, *69 authors*
have come together as a community, representing the core *adopters*,
*advisory board members*, and/or key *collaborators* of FAIRsharing
(https://fairsharing.org), a resource launched in 2011 and matured under
the guidance of the *joint Force11 and RDA WG* and it international
userbase community.
The article presents the mission and work of FAIRsharing, and shows the

10 Oct 2018

[question] Re: [rda-biosharing-wg] IMPORTANT NOTICE: New Group mailing list

Dear Sara and Secretariat,
Many thanks for the changes and the notification. Can you please clarify (also to the WG members) if we/they need to register again to the new one. I guess and hope not, but imo it is not clear.
Also, from tracking and provenance shall we assume the messages sent - during these last two years - to the list will remain visible on the (new) WG webpage?
Kind regards
Susanna
(Sent from my phone)
--
--

27 Sep 2018

Updates: WG rename and pre-print publication

Dear RDA WG member,
two updates:
1. RDA has approved the rename on our WG (from BioSharing to FAIRsharing)
3. The co-chairs are in the process of finalizing and submitting the
FAIRsharing WG recommendations for final community feedback; I will
email the list when this is out.
2. See the pre-print on "FAIRsharing, as a cohesive community approach
to the growth in standards, repositories and policies" at
https://doi.org/10.1101/245183 co-authored by stakeholders from

22 Mar 2018

Proposed solution for outputs of this group/possible further work

Dear members of the RDA BioSharing WG,

TAB has been discussing the question of the name of the recommendations from this group, and avenues for further work.

As Susanna indicated yesterday, I agreed to send an email to the group with some proposals for you to consider.

1. Name of the Recommendations

We understand why this has now changed to FAIRSharing, to reflect the expanded scope of the recommendation (undertaken under the FORCE11 banner), and the name of the registry.

22 Mar 2018

Proposed solution for outputs of this group/possible further work

Dear members of the RDA BioSharing WG,

TAB has been discussing the question of the name of the recommendations from this group, and avenues for further work.

As Susanna indicated yesterday, I agreed to send an email to the group with some proposals for you to consider.

1. Name of the Recommendations

We understand why this has now changed to FAIRSharing, to reflect the expanded scope of the recommendation (undertaken under the FORCE11 banner), and the name of the registry.

21 Mar 2018

BioSharing vs FAIRsharing name for the RDA WG - updates to the members

Dear RDA WG members,
A due clarification, as some of you may be confused from this unusual exchange. The discussion has to do with a known pending issue: aligning the name of this WG (BioSharing) with its recommendations and registry, which based on community request has been renamed (to FAIRsharing) to reflect its scope.
I have now had the chance to discuss it with Paul (by email) and in person with Andrew Treolar, TAB chair and here in cc.

21 Mar 2018

Re: [tab][rda-biosharing-wg] Fwd: [rda-biosharing-wg] RDA P11, the WG recommendation, DOIs and more!

Dear Paul,
I believe you have mistakenly sent this to the whole WG list, not just to TAB. There are several inaccurate representation of the facts below, reason why I keep the WG list in cc for transparency and add the secretariat.
In particular the change of the registry name (not of the WG, which - like you correctly point - out was unfortunately declined by TAB) was the result of community feedback and not a last minute rebrand of the RDA WG; however as this is a joint WG with Force11, a full change of name (to align registry and WG) has instead happen there.

Pages