There is no such content in this group

Posts

15
May
2019

FAIRsharing WG output is now an RDA recommendation

by Peter McQuilton

Dear RDA colleagues, On behalf of my co-chairs and I, it is with great pleasure that I am able to announce that the FAIRsharing joint RDA/Force11 WG output has been fully recommended by the RDA. The output from this WG is now among the 12 RDA “flagship” Outputs (full list at: https://tinyurl.com/RDArecommendations), which are the official, endorsed results of the groups, substantiated by community adoption and use.
0 | Add new comment
03
April
2019

RDA FAIRsharing WG output and adoption: FAIRer Resources for FAIRer Data

by Susanna-Assunta Sansone

Dear RDA colleagues, Today, in an open access /Nature Biotechnology/ article, *69 authors* have come together as a community, representing the core *adopters*, *advisory board members*, and/or key *collaborators* of FAIRsharing (https://fairsharing.org), a resource launched in 2011 and matured under the guidance of the *joint Force11 and RDA WG* and it international userbase community. The article presents the mission and work of FAIRsharing, and shows the
0 | Add new comment
11
February
2019

Registration Now Open for RDA Plenary 13 in Philadelphia

by Jamie Lupo-Petta

Register today for RDA Plenary 13 (P13), to be held from 2-4 April 2019 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania at the Loews Hotel. Early bird pricing is available only until 2 March 2019.     Register today at https://www.rd-alliance.org/registration-now-open-rda-plenary-13-philadelphia.  
0 | Add new comment
10
October
2018

[question] Re: [rda-biosharing-wg] IMPORTANT NOTICE: New Group mailing list

by Susanna-Assunta Sansone

Dear Sara and Secretariat, Many thanks for the changes and the notification. Can you please clarify (also to the WG members) if we/they need to register again to the new one. I guess and hope not, but imo it is not clear. Also, from tracking and provenance shall we assume the messages sent - during these last two years - to the list will remain visible on the (new) WG webpage? Kind regards Susanna (Sent from my phone) -- --
1 | Add new comment
27
September
2018

Updates: WG rename and pre-print publication

by Susanna-Assunta Sansone

Dear RDA WG member, two updates: 1. RDA has approved the rename on our WG (from BioSharing to FAIRsharing) 3. The co-chairs are in the process of finalizing and submitting the FAIRsharing WG recommendations for final community feedback; I will email the list when this is out. 2. See the pre-print on "FAIRsharing, as a cohesive community approach to the growth in standards, repositories and policies" at https://doi.org/10.1101/245183 co-authored by stakeholders from
0 | Add new comment
22
March
2018

Proposed solution for outputs of this group/possible further work

by Andrew Treloar

Dear members of the RDA BioSharing WG, TAB has been discussing the question of the name of the recommendations from this group, and avenues for further work. As Susanna indicated yesterday, I agreed to send an email to the group with some proposals for you to consider. 1. Name of the Recommendations We understand why this has now changed to FAIRSharing, to reflect the expanded scope of the recommendation (undertaken under the FORCE11 banner), and the name of the registry.
0 | Add new comment
22
March
2018

Proposed solution for outputs of this group/possible further work

by Andrew Treloar

Dear members of the RDA BioSharing WG, TAB has been discussing the question of the name of the recommendations from this group, and avenues for further work. As Susanna indicated yesterday, I agreed to send an email to the group with some proposals for you to consider. 1. Name of the Recommendations We understand why this has now changed to FAIRSharing, to reflect the expanded scope of the recommendation (undertaken under the FORCE11 banner), and the name of the registry.
0 | Add new comment
21
March
2018

BioSharing vs FAIRsharing name for the RDA WG - updates to the members

by Susanna-Assunta Sansone

Dear RDA WG members, A due clarification, as some of you may be confused from this unusual exchange. The discussion has to do with a known pending issue: aligning the name of this WG (BioSharing) with its recommendations and registry, which based on community request has been renamed (to FAIRsharing) to reflect its scope. I have now had the chance to discuss it with Paul (by email) and in person with Andrew Treolar, TAB chair and here in cc.
0 | Add new comment
21
March
2018

Re: [tab][rda-biosharing-wg] Fwd: [rda-biosharing-wg] RDA P11, the WG recommendation, DOIs and more!

by Susanna-Assunta Sansone

Dear Paul, I believe you have mistakenly sent this to the whole WG list, not just to TAB. There are several inaccurate representation of the facts below, reason why I keep the WG list in cc for transparency and add the secretariat. In particular the change of the registry name (not of the WG, which - like you correctly point - out was unfortunately declined by TAB) was the result of community feedback and not a last minute rebrand of the RDA WG; however as this is a joint WG with Force11, a full change of name (to align registry and WG) has instead happen there.
0 | Add new comment

Pages