There is no such content in this group

Posts

24
February
2017

AW: [rda-oab][rda-datafabric-ig] Re: [rda-oab][rda-datafabric-ig] [rda-oab][rda-datafabric-ig] [rda-datafabric-ig] 3 DFIG items and one action

by Peter Wittenburg

Thanks Jamie. Absolutely d'accord with what you state: we need to get things into production and it is great that you in particular are very successful. As indicated DFIG would be happy to include your points into its discussions. best Peter Von: Jamie.Shiers=***@***.***-groups.org [mailto:***@***.***-groups.org] Im Auftrag von Jamie Shiers Gesendet: Freitag, 24. Februar 2017 08:05
0 | Add new comment
24
February
2017

Re: [rda-oab][rda-datafabric-ig] [rda-oab][rda-datafabric-ig] [rda-datafabric-ig] 3 DFIG items and one action

by Jamie Shiers

Dear Peter, Thanks for these clarifications. From the HEP side I would like to point out: - In 2013 I presented a 2020 vision for long-term data preservation in HEP to the International Committee for Future Accelerators (ICFA) - In 2016, we presented a paper at iPRES on the PRODUCTION services that CERN offers for the above
0 | Add new comment
22
February
2017

Re: [rda-oab][rda-datafabric-ig] [rda-datafabric-ig] 3 DFIG items and one action

by Jamie Shiers

Well, it has certainly caused some confusion in HEP that I am at pains to address. The document does not read like you suggest. Cheers, Jamie Executive Summary
1 | Add new comment
22
February
2017

Fwd: [rda-datafabric-ig] 3 DFIG items and one action

by Jamie Shiers

Dear all, Perhaps some of you were as surprised as me to receive this mail with “recommendations on what we should do next”. I could certainly comment on the contents of the document - e.g. the references to HEP, the EIROforum - but my main issue is process. Is DFIG - of even a subset - tasked to make such “recommendations”? Maybe I am mis-reading this mail; maybe it is another example of “volunteer” work (and not official); maybe I have mis-read the Council mandate? Cheers, Jamie Begin forwarded message: From: Peter Wittenburg
0 | Add new comment
21
February
2017

3 DFIG items and one action

by Peter Wittenburg

Dear DFIG colleagues, some of us in DFIG were active and it is now time to present 3 items to you. Please do NOT respond per email, but use the DFIG pages to comment. We will update the pages during the coming days.
0 | Add new comment
23
January
2017

recommendations note

by Peter Wittenburg

Dear Data Fabric colleagues, now after the change of the year we should get more active again via the list. Here are two issues to of relevance: - A group of experts from the realm of the DFIG and other closely active groups finished a recommendations note that was requested by DG RTD of the European Commission due to a deadline. We stopped now asking for even more supporters but will put this document at the DFIG site for commenting and supporting. The document is citable and can be found here:
0 | Add new comment
17
September
2016

DFIG core session

by Peter Wittenburg

Dear DFIG members, I finished a very intensive time with this plenary in Denver since I had many other activities in parallel which prevented me to be more active. These will all come to an end during the coming few months. Let me briefly summarise a few major points that were discussed in the DFIG core session. For details you can also look at the attached slides. We elected two new co-chairs: - Bridget Almas from Tufts University US - Li Jianhui from CAS China
1 | Add new comment
07
July
2016

TeD-T platform back alive

by Thomas Zastrow

(Apologies for cross posting) Dear all, Our technical problems are solved and the TeD-T platform is back again: http://smw-rda.esc.rzg.mpg.de Best wishes, Tom -- Dr. Thomas Zastrow Max Planck Computing and Data Facility (MPCDF) Gießenbachstr. 2, D-85748 Garching bei München, Germany Tel +49-89-3299-1457 http://www.mpcdf.de
0 | Add new comment
24
April
2016

AW: [rda-datafabric-ig][rda-dft][rda-collection-wg] Some thoughts on "Data Aggregations" terminology & concepts

by Peter Wittenburg

Dear all, the DFIG co-chairs are impressed about the intensive interactions. Due to some events and other tasks we were not yet participating in the debate. Coming event we will come up with some opinions, in particular since we also need to plan the sessions in Denver. best Peter ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Peter Wittenburg Tel: +49 2821 49180 ***@***.*** ; ***@***.***
0 | Add new comment
19
April
2016

Some thoughts on "Data Aggregations" terminology & concepts

by Gary Berg-Cross

There may be useful analogy to a physical sample that is collected. You have that object at birth with an id, but over time you can add to this and take away from it. The original ID serves a purpose but you may need an ID for the current state of the object at any time there has been change. Gary Berg-Cross, Ph.D. ***@***.*** ​​ ​ *http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?GaryBergCross *
0 | Add new comment

Pages