Additional links to informative material:
publications/reference readings
Artefacts and C[H]arms, AI narratives project workshop report Vandenboom, F (2022) on file with author
Brownsword, R (2019) Law, Technology and Society: Reimagining the Regulatory Environment, Routledge;
Brecht, B. (1960). The Caucasian chalk circle. London, U.K.: Methuen
Bartlett, R. (2013) Playing with meaning: using cartoons to disseminate research findings. Qualitative Research 13(2) 214–27;
Cross N (1982) Designerly ways of knowing. Des Stud 3(4):221–227.
Dunne and Raby (2013) Speculative Everything, Design, Fiction, and Social Dreaming, The MIT Press
Eisner, E. (2002). The arts and the creation of mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Chatziathanasiou, K (2022) Beware the Lureof Narratives: ‘Hungry Judges’ Should not Motivate the Use of ‘Artificial Intelligence’ in Law. German Law Journal (23) 2022, 452–464.
Graves, Jen. 2014. What Only Artists Can Teach Us About Technology, Data, and Surveillance. The Stranger, December 10, 2014.
Greenwood, J. (2019, February 25). Arts-Based Research. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education.
Gardiner, R. (2015). Troubling method. In Gender, authenticity, and leadership (pp. 108–129). London, U.K.: Palgrave Macmillan.
Leavy, P. (Ed.). (2017). Handbook of arts-based research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Schön D-A (1984) The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. Basic Books, New York
Van den Boom, F (2023) The State of Glitch, a speculative design provocation for inclusive AI futures, in Morals & Machines Journal published by Nomos publishing house. DOI:10.5771/2747-5174-2022-2-42
examples