Skip to main content

Notice

The new RDA web platform is still being rolled out. Existing RDA members PLEASE REACTIVATE YOUR ACCOUNT using this link: https://rda-login.wicketcloud.com/users/confirmation. Please report bugs, broken links and provide your feedback using the UserSnap tool on the bottom right corner of each page. Stay updated about the web site milestones at https://www.rd-alliance.org/rda-web-platform-upcoming-features-and-functionalities/.

PID for research metadata presentation (draft)

  • Creator
    Discussion
  • #99471

    Hello,
    As discussed previously, I’m showing you this presentation I’m
    going to give in 2 weeks. It’s a first draft, and I will welcome
    all your recommandations.
    Maybe it lacks some illustrations, I’ll be glad to read your
    feedbacks.
    Cheers,

    Jonathan (ノ°益°)ノ 彡 [ɹǝɟɟǝɐɥɔS]
    Observatoire des Sciences de l’Univers de Grenoble
    Responsable technique Résif-DC
    ✉ Isterre, bureau 035, 1381 rue de la Piscine 38610 GIERES
    ✆ +33 4 76 63 51 37

  • Author
    Replies
  • #129239

    Hi Jonathan,
    overall looks good to me, few comment on this statement: “There is a
    mapping with DataCite schema (to assign a DOI to your instrument) and
    ePIC This way, an instrument can be assigned with a DOI or a Handle.”
    * ePIC and DataCite are two *implementations* of PIDINST schema,
    DataCite requires a schema mapping and ePIC is a full PIDINST schema
    implementation
    * DataCite DOIs are Handles, too, and I believe ePIC IDs can be
    resolved via https://doi.org.
    Cheers, m.
    On Fri, Jun 3, 2022 at 4:26 PM Jonathan Schaeffer via Persistent
    Identification of Instruments WG

Log in to reply.