Harmonised terminologies and schemas for FAIR data in materials science and related domains WG
Working Group Recommendation
July 24, 2026
Harmonised Terminologies and Schemas for FAIR Data in Materials Science and Related Domains Working Group: Final Report and Recommendations
- Output Type: Working Group Recommendation
- Output Status: Preparing for Council Review
- Review Period End: 2026-08-24
- DOI: 10.15497/RDA00158
- Regions: Global
- Primary Domain: Natural Sciences
- RDA Pathways: Data Infrastructures and Environments - Discipline Focused,Semantics, Ontology, Standardisation
- Group Technology Focus: Re-Use, Search & Discovery
- Stakeholders: Early Career Individuals, Industry & Private Sector, Infrastructure Providers, Research Performing Organisations, Researchers & Scientists
- Sustainable Development Goals: Affordable and Clean Energy, Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure
- Language: English
Comments
You must be logged in or join the group to leave a comment.
August 16, 2026 at 12:35 pm
Timothy Cook says:
I strongly support this, and P-Rec. 1 in the Semantic Artefacts field guide already does the important part by requiring persistent, resolvable identifiers for artefact versions, not just artefacts. The one thing worth making explicit is the reciprocal obligation on the data side: a dataset's semantic reference should resolve to the specific version identifier it was authored against, not a version-agnostic "latest."
Otherwise, Recommendation 2 carries a latent tension, since a maintainer improving an artifact can silently change the meaning of data that already cited it. Pinning references to the version-level PID lets artefacts keep evolving without retroactively altering published data, which is exactly the durability the report is after. It may be worth one line in the Data field guide's reuse section to mirror P-Rec. 1.