Skip to main content

Notice

We are in the process of rolling out a soft launch of the RDA website, which includes a new member platform. Existing RDA members PLEASE REACTIVATE YOUR ACCOUNT using this link: https://rda-login.wicketcloud.com/users/confirmation. Visitors may encounter functionality issues with group pages, navigation, missing content, broken links, etc. As you explore the new site, please provide your feedback using the UserSnap tool on the bottom right corner of each page. Thank you for your understanding and support as we work through all issues as quickly as possible. Stay updated about upcoming features and functionalities: https://www.rd-alliance.org/rda-web-platform-upcoming-features-and-functionalities/

Re: [sharc-ig][gofair] RDA P15 Melbourne – Session Acceptance (Improve before Accept)

  • Creator
    Discussion
  • #105884

    Yvan Le Bras
    Member

    Dear Isabelle,
    Hope all is doing well on your side.
    We are working on the “draft” state of the abstract but we are not sure of what is the meaning of the first requested improvement. This session can’t be officially called a joint session because RDA is waiting something from the GO FAIR RDA IG so even if GO FAIR BiodiFAIRse IN & others GO FAIR people are involved in the session, we must resubmit “just” as a SHARC IG session?
    Don’t hesitate to come back to me for further questions.
    Wishing you a happy Christmas and end of year.
    Best,
    Yvan
    Le 23 déc. 2019 09:52, “IP2904 via Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) IG” a écrit :
    Dear Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) Interest Group and GO FAIR Interest Group,
     
    At its meeting on December 19, the RDA Technical Advisory Board considered your proposal for a session at Plenary 15 in 2020. 
     
    Unfortunately, TAB is not able to accept your session proposal unless you make the changes that are listed below. If you still wish to proceed you will need to:
    1. Update the session description to address TAB’s concerns by or before Jan 2nd, 2020
    2. Advise i***@***.*** that you have done this so TAB can review your response
     
    Requested improvements:
     
     
    -This is listed as a Joint Session of the SHARC IG (OK) and GO FAIR IG. This is not acceptable since TAB is still waiting for an update of the initial GO FAIR IG charter. This session should thus be resubmitted just as a session of the SHARC IG
    – The abstract looks like a draft, with lots of question marks and incomplete areas. This needs to be rectified before acceptance. 
     
    Best regards,
     
    Isabelle Perseil, TAB co-chair
     
     
     
    –Full post: https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/data-conservation-ig/post/rda-p15-melb…Manage my subscriptions: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglistStop emails for this post: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/67308
    –Full post: https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/sharing-rewards-and-credit-sharc-ig-go…Manage my subscriptions: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglistStop emails for this post: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/67309

  • Author
    Replies
  • #130243

    Dear Yvan,
    As mentioned, TAB decided that this session should thus be
    resubmitted just as a session of the SHARC IG.
    Best Wishes et bon
    réveillon !
    Amicalement / Yours
    Isabelle
    Le 2019-12-24 17:12,
    ylebras via Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) IG a écrit :
    > Dear
    Isabelle,
    >
    > Hope all is doing well on your side.
    >
    > We are
    working on the “draft” state of the abstract but we are not sure of what
    is the meaning of the first requested improvement. This session can’t be
    officially called a joint session because RDA is waiting something from
    the GO FAIR RDA IG so even if GO FAIR BiodiFAIRse IN & others GO FAIR
    people are involved in the session, we must resubmit “just” as a SHARC
    IG session?
    >
    > Don’t hesitate to come back to me for further
    questions.
    Dear Yvan,
    As mentioned, TAB decided that this session should thus be
    resubmitted just as a session of the SHARC IG.
    Best Wishes et bon
    réveillon !
    Amicalement / Yours
    Isabelle
    Le 2019-12-24 17:12,
    ylebras via Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) IG a écrit :
    > Dear
    Dear Yvan,
    As mentioned, TAB decided that this session should thus be
    resubmitted just as a session of the SHARC IG.
    Best Wishes et bon
    réveillon !
    Amicalement / Yours
    Isabelle
    Le 2019-12-24 17:12,
    ylebras via Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) IG a écrit :
    > Dear
    Isabelle,
    >
    > Hope all is doing well on your side.
    >
    > We are
    working on the “draft” state of the abstract but we are not sure of what
    is the meaning of the first requested improvement. This session can’t be
    officially called a joint session because RDA is waiting something from
    the GO FAIR RDA IG so even if GO FAIR BiodiFAIRse IN & others GO FAIR
    people are involved in the session, we must resubmit “just” as a SHARC
    Dear Yvan,
    As mentioned, TAB decided that this session should thus be
    resubmitted just as a session of the SHARC IG.
    Best Wishes et bon
    réveillon !
    Amicalement / Yours
    Isabelle
    Le 2019-12-24 17:12,
    ylebras via Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) IG a écrit :
    > Dear
    Isabelle,
    >
    > Hope all is doing well on your side.
    >
    > We are
    working on the “draft” state of the abstract but we are not sure of what
    is the meaning of the first requested improvement. This session can’t be
    officially called a joint session because RDA is waiting something from
    the GO FAIR RDA IG so even if GO FAIR BiodiFAIRse IN & others GO FAIR
    people are involved in the session, we must resubmit “just” as a SHARC
    IG session?
    >
    > Don’t hesitate to come back to me for further
    Dear Yvan,
    As mentioned, TAB decided that this session should thus be
    resubmitted just as a session of the SHARC IG.
    Best Wishes et bon
    réveillon !
    Amicalement / Yours
    Isabelle
    Le 2019-12-24 17:12,
    ylebras via Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) IG a écrit :
    > Dear
    Isabelle,
    >
    > Hope all is doing well on your side.
    >
    > We are
    working on the “draft” state of the abstract but we are not sure of what
    is the meaning of the first requested improvement. This session can’t be
    officially called a joint session because RDA is waiting something from
    the GO FAIR RDA IG so even if GO FAIR BiodiFAIRse IN & others GO FAIR
    people are involved in the session, we must resubmit “just” as a SHARC
    IG session?
    >
    > Don’t hesitate to come back to me for further
    questions.
    >
    > Wishing you a happy Christmas and end of year.
    >
    >
    Dear Yvan,
    As mentioned, TAB decided that this session should thus be
    resubmitted just as a session of the SHARC IG.
    Best Wishes et bon
    réveillon !
    Amicalement / Yours
    Isabelle
    Le 2019-12-24 17:12,
    ylebras via Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) IG a écrit :
    > Dear
    Isabelle,
    >
    > Hope all is doing well on your side.
    >
    > We are
    working on the “draft” state of the abstract but we are not sure of what
    is the meaning of the first requested improvement. This session can’t be
    officially called a joint session because RDA is waiting something from
    the GO FAIR RDA IG so even if GO FAIR BiodiFAIRse IN & others GO FAIR
    people are involved in the session, we must resubmit “just” as a SHARC
    IG session?
    >
    > Don’t hesitate to come back to me for further
    questions.
    >
    > Wishing you a happy Christmas and end of year.
    >
    >
    Best,
    >
    > Yvan
    >
    > Le 23 déc. 2019 09:52, “IP2904 via Sharing Rewards
    Dear Yvan,
    As mentioned, TAB decided that this session should thus be
    resubmitted just as a session of the SHARC IG.
    Best Wishes et bon
    réveillon !
    Amicalement / Yours
    Isabelle
    Le 2019-12-24 17:12,
    ylebras via Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) IG a écrit :
    > Dear
    Isabelle,
    >
    > Hope all is doing well on your side.
    >
    > We are
    working on the “draft” state of the abstract but we are not sure of what
    is the meaning of the first requested improvement. This session can’t be
    officially called a joint session because RDA is waiting something from
    the GO FAIR RDA IG so even if GO FAIR BiodiFAIRse IN & others GO FAIR
    people are involved in the session, we must resubmit “just” as a SHARC
    IG session?
    >
    > Don’t hesitate to come back to me for further
    questions.
    >
    > Wishing you a happy Christmas and end of year.
    >
    >
    Best,
    >
    > Yvan
    >
    > Le 23 déc. 2019 09:52, “IP2904 via Sharing Rewards
    and Credit (S HARC) IG” a écrit :
    >
    >> Dear
    Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) Interest Group and GO FAIR Interest
    Dear Yvan,
    As mentioned, TAB decided that this session should thus be
    resubmitted just as a session of the SHARC IG.
    Best Wishes et bon
    réveillon !
    Amicalement / Yours
    Isabelle
    Le 2019-12-24 17:12,
    ylebras via Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) IG a écrit :
    > Dear
    Isabelle,
    >
    > Hope all is doing well on your side.
    >
    > We are
    working on the “draft” state of the abstract but we are not sure of what
    is the meaning of the first requested improvement. This session can’t be
    officially called a joint session because RDA is waiting something from
    the GO FAIR RDA IG so even if GO FAIR BiodiFAIRse IN & others GO FAIR
    people are involved in the session, we must resubmit “just” as a SHARC
    IG session?
    >
    > Don’t hesitate to come back to me for further
    questions.
    >
    > Wishing you a happy Christmas and end of year.
    >
    >
    Best,
    >
    > Yvan
    >
    > Le 23 déc. 2019 09:52, “IP2904 via Sharing Rewards
    and Credit (S HARC) IG” a écrit :
    >
    >> Dear
    Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) Interest Group and GO FAIR Interest
    Group,
    >>
    >> At its meeting on December 19, the RDA Technical Advisory
    Dear Yvan,
    As mentioned, TAB decided that this session should thus be
    resubmitted just as a session of the SHARC IG.
    Best Wishes et bon
    réveillon !
    Amicalement / Yours
    Isabelle
    Le 2019-12-24 17:12,
    ylebras via Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) IG a écrit :
    > Dear
    Isabelle,
    >
    > Hope all is doing well on your side.
    >
    > We are
    working on the “draft” state of the abstract but we are not sure of what
    is the meaning of the first requested improvement. This session can’t be
    officially called a joint session because RDA is waiting something from
    the GO FAIR RDA IG so even if GO FAIR BiodiFAIRse IN & others GO FAIR
    people are involved in the session, we must resubmit “just” as a SHARC
    IG session?
    >
    > Don’t hesitate to come back to me for further
    questions.
    >
    > Wishing you a happy Christmas and end of year.
    >
    >
    Best,
    >
    > Yvan
    >
    > Le 23 déc. 2019 09:52, “IP2904 via Sharing Rewards
    and Credit (S HARC) IG” a écrit :
    >
    >> Dear
    Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) Interest Group and GO FAIR Interest
    Group,
    >>
    >> At its meeting on December 19, the RDA Technical Advisory
    Board considered your proposal for a session at Plenary 15 in 2020.
    >>
    >> Unfortunately, TAB IS NOT ABLE TO ACCEPT YOUR SESSION PROPOSAL
    UNLESS YOU MAKE THE CHANGES THAT ARE LISTED BELOW. IF YOU STILL WISH TO
    >> 1. Update the session description to
    address TAB’s concerns BY OR BEFORE JAN 2ND, 2020
    >> 2. ADVISE
    ***@***.*** THAT YOU HAVE DONE THIS so TAB can review
    your response
    >>
    >> Requested improvements:
    >>
    >> -This is listed as
    a Joint Session of the SHARC IG (OK) and GO FAIR IG. This is not
    acceptable since TAB is still waiting for an update of the initial GO
    FAIR IG charter. This session should thus be resubmitted just as a
    session of the SHARC IG
    >> – The abstract looks like a draft, with lots
    of question marks and incomplete areas. This needs to be rectified
    before acceptance.
    >>
    >> Best regards,
    >>
    >> Isabelle Perseil, TAB
    co-chair
    >>
    >> —
    >> Full post:
    https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/data-conservation-ig/post/rda-p15-melb
    >>
    Manage my subscriptions: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist
    >>
    Stop emails for this post:
    https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/67308
    >> Full
    post:
    https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/sharing-rewards-and-credit-sharc-ig-go
    >>
    Manage my subscriptions: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist
    >>
    Stop emails for this post:
    https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/67309
    >
    Dear Yvan,
    As mentioned, TAB decided that this session should thus be
    resubmitted just as a session of the SHARC IG.
    Best Wishes et bon
    réveillon !
    Amicalement / Yours
    Isabelle
    Le 2019-12-24 17:12,
    ylebras via Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) IG a écrit :
    > Dear
    Isabelle,
    >
    > Hope all is doing well on your side.
    >
    > We are
    working on the “draft” state of the abstract but we are not sure of what
    is the meaning of the first requested improvement. This session can’t be
    officially called a joint session because RDA is waiting something from
    the GO FAIR RDA IG so even if GO FAIR BiodiFAIRse IN & others GO FAIR
    people are involved in the session, we must resubmit “just” as a SHARC
    IG session?
    >
    > Don’t hesitate to come back to me for further
    questions.
    >
    > Wishing you a happy Christmas and end of year.
    >
    >
    Best,
    >
    > Yvan
    >
    > Le 23 déc. 2019 09:52, “IP2904 via Sharing Rewards
    and Credit (S HARC) IG” a écrit :
    >
    >> Dear
    Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) Interest Group and GO FAIR Interest
    Group,
    >>
    >> At its meeting on December 19, the RDA Technical Advisory
    Board considered your proposal for a session at Plenary 15 in 2020.
    >>
    >> Unfortunately, TAB IS NOT ABLE TO ACCEPT YOUR SESSION PROPOSAL
    UNLESS YOU MAKE THE CHANGES THAT ARE LISTED BELOW. IF YOU STILL WISH TO
    PROCEED YOU WILL NEED TO:
    >> 1. Update the session description to
    Dear Yvan,
    As mentioned, TAB decided that this session should thus be
    resubmitted just as a session of the SHARC IG.
    Best Wishes et bon
    réveillon !
    Amicalement / Yours
    Isabelle
    Le 2019-12-24 17:12,
    ylebras via Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) IG a écrit :
    > Dear
    Isabelle,
    >
    > Hope all is doing well on your side.
    >
    > We are
    working on the “draft” state of the abstract but we are not sure of what
    is the meaning of the first requested improvement. This session can’t be
    officially called a joint session because RDA is waiting something from
    the GO FAIR RDA IG so even if GO FAIR BiodiFAIRse IN & others GO FAIR
    people are involved in the session, we must resubmit “just” as a SHARC
    IG session?
    >
    > Don’t hesitate to come back to me for further
    questions.
    >
    > Wishing you a happy Christmas and end of year.
    >
    >
    Best,
    >
    > Yvan
    >
    > Le 23 déc. 2019 09:52, “IP2904 via Sharing Rewards
    and Credit (S HARC) IG” a écrit :
    >
    >> Dear
    Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) Interest Group and GO FAIR Interest
    Group,
    >>
    >> At its meeting on December 19, the RDA Technical Advisory
    Board considered your proposal for a session at Plenary 15 in 2020.
    >>
    >> Unfortunately, TAB IS NOT ABLE TO ACCEPT YOUR SESSION PROPOSAL
    UNLESS YOU MAKE THE CHANGES THAT ARE LISTED BELOW. IF YOU STILL WISH TO
    PROCEED YOU WILL NEED TO:
    >> 1. Update the session description to
    address TAB’s concerns BY OR BEFORE JAN 2ND, 2020
    >> 2. ADVISE
    ***@***.*** THAT YOU HAVE DONE THIS so TAB can review
    Dear Yvan,
    As mentioned, TAB decided that this session should thus be
    resubmitted just as a session of the SHARC IG.
    Best Wishes et bon
    réveillon !
    Amicalement / Yours
    Isabelle
    Le 2019-12-24 17:12,
    ylebras via Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) IG a écrit :
    > Dear
    Isabelle,
    >
    > Hope all is doing well on your side.
    >
    > We are
    working on the “draft” state of the abstract but we are not sure of what
    is the meaning of the first requested improvement. This session can’t be
    officially called a joint session because RDA is waiting something from
    the GO FAIR RDA IG so even if GO FAIR BiodiFAIRse IN & others GO FAIR
    people are involved in the session, we must resubmit “just” as a SHARC
    IG session?
    >
    > Don’t hesitate to come back to me for further
    questions.
    >
    > Wishing you a happy Christmas and end of year.
    >
    >
    Best,
    >
    > Yvan
    >
    > Le 23 déc. 2019 09:52, “IP2904 via Sharing Rewards
    and Credit (S HARC) IG” a écrit :
    >
    >> Dear
    Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) Interest Group and GO FAIR Interest
    Group,
    >>
    >> At its meeting on December 19, the RDA Technical Advisory
    Board considered your proposal for a session at Plenary 15 in 2020.
    >>
    >> Unfortunately, TAB IS NOT ABLE TO ACCEPT YOUR SESSION PROPOSAL
    UNLESS YOU MAKE THE CHANGES THAT ARE LISTED BELOW. IF YOU STILL WISH TO
    PROCEED YOU WILL NEED TO:
    >> 1. Update the session description to
    address TAB’s concerns BY OR BEFORE JAN 2ND, 2020
    >> 2. ADVISE
    ***@***.*** THAT YOU HAVE DONE THIS so TAB can review
    your response
    >>
    >> Requested improvements:
    >>
    >> -This is listed as
    a Joint Session of the SHARC IG (OK) and GO FAIR IG. This is not
    acceptable since TAB is still waiting for an update of the initial GO
    FAIR IG charter. This session should thus be resubmitted just as a
    >> – The abstract looks like a draft, with lots
    of question marks and incomplete areas. This needs to be rectified
    before acceptance.
    >>
    >> Best regards,
    >>
    >> Isabelle Perseil, TAB
    co-chair
    >>
    >> —
    >> Full post:
    https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/data-conservation-ig/post/rda-p15-melb
    >>
    Manage my subscriptions: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist
    >>
    Stop emails for this post:
    https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/67308
    >> Full
    post:
    https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/sharing-rewards-and-credit-sharc-ig-go
    >>
    Manage my subscriptions: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist
    >>
    Stop emails for this post:
    https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/67309
    >
    Dear Yvan,
    As mentioned, TAB decided that this session should thus be
    resubmitted just as a session of the SHARC IG.
    Best Wishes et bon
    réveillon !
    Amicalement / Yours
    Isabelle
    Le 2019-12-24 17:12,
    ylebras via Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) IG a écrit :
    > Dear
    Isabelle,
    >
    > Hope all is doing well on your side.
    >
    > We are
    working on the “draft” state of the abstract but we are not sure of what
    is the meaning of the first requested improvement. This session can’t be
    officially called a joint session because RDA is waiting something from
    the GO FAIR RDA IG so even if GO FAIR BiodiFAIRse IN & others GO FAIR
    people are involved in the session, we must resubmit “just” as a SHARC
    IG session?
    >
    > Don’t hesitate to come back to me for further
    questions.
    >
    > Wishing you a happy Christmas and end of year.
    >
    >
    Best,
    >
    > Yvan
    >
    > Le 23 déc. 2019 09:52, “IP2904 via Sharing Rewards
    and Credit (S HARC) IG” a écrit :
    >
    >> Dear
    Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) Interest Group and GO FAIR Interest
    Group,
    >>
    >> At its meeting on December 19, the RDA Technical Advisory
    Board considered your proposal for a session at Plenary 15 in 2020.
    >>
    >> Unfortunately, TAB IS NOT ABLE TO ACCEPT YOUR SESSION PROPOSAL
    UNLESS YOU MAKE THE CHANGES THAT ARE LISTED BELOW. IF YOU STILL WISH TO
    PROCEED YOU WILL NEED TO:
    >> 1. Update the session description to
    address TAB’s concerns BY OR BEFORE JAN 2ND, 2020
    >> 2. ADVISE
    ***@***.*** THAT YOU HAVE DONE THIS so TAB can review
    your response
    >>
    >> Requested improvements:
    >>
    >> -This is listed as
    a Joint Session of the SHARC IG (OK) and GO FAIR IG. This is not
    acceptable since TAB is still waiting for an update of the initial GO
    FAIR IG charter. This session should thus be resubmitted just as a
    session of the SHARC IG
    >> – The abstract looks like a draft, with lots
    of question marks and incomplete areas. This needs to be rectified
    Dear Yvan,
    As mentioned, TAB decided that this session should thus be
    resubmitted just as a session of the SHARC IG.
    Best Wishes et bon
    réveillon !
    Amicalement / Yours
    Isabelle
    Le 2019-12-24 17:12,
    ylebras via Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) IG a écrit :
    > Dear
    Isabelle,
    >
    > Hope all is doing well on your side.
    >
    > We are
    working on the “draft” state of the abstract but we are not sure of what
    is the meaning of the first requested improvement. This session can’t be
    officially called a joint session because RDA is waiting something from
    the GO FAIR RDA IG so even if GO FAIR BiodiFAIRse IN & others GO FAIR
    people are involved in the session, we must resubmit “just” as a SHARC
    IG session?
    >
    > Don’t hesitate to come back to me for further
    questions.
    >
    > Wishing you a happy Christmas and end of year.
    >
    >
    Best,
    >
    > Yvan
    >
    > Le 23 déc. 2019 09:52, “IP2904 via Sharing Rewards
    and Credit (S HARC) IG” a écrit :
    >
    >> Dear
    Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) Interest Group and GO FAIR Interest
    Group,
    >>
    >> At its meeting on December 19, the RDA Technical Advisory
    Board considered your proposal for a session at Plenary 15 in 2020.
    >>
    >> Unfortunately, TAB IS NOT ABLE TO ACCEPT YOUR SESSION PROPOSAL
    UNLESS YOU MAKE THE CHANGES THAT ARE LISTED BELOW. IF YOU STILL WISH TO
    PROCEED YOU WILL NEED TO:
    >> 1. Update the session description to
    address TAB’s concerns BY OR BEFORE JAN 2ND, 2020
    >> 2. ADVISE
    ***@***.*** THAT YOU HAVE DONE THIS so TAB can review
    your response
    >>
    >> Requested improvements:
    >>
    >> -This is listed as
    a Joint Session of the SHARC IG (OK) and GO FAIR IG. This is not
    acceptable since TAB is still waiting for an update of the initial GO
    FAIR IG charter. This session should thus be resubmitted just as a
    session of the SHARC IG
    >> – The abstract looks like a draft, with lots
    of question marks and incomplete areas. This needs to be rectified
    before acceptance.
    >>
    >> Best regards,
    >>
    >> Isabelle Perseil, TAB
    Dear Yvan,
    As mentioned, TAB decided that this session should thus be
    resubmitted just as a session of the SHARC IG.
    Best Wishes et bon
    réveillon !
    Amicalement / Yours
    Isabelle
    Le 2019-12-24 17:12,
    ylebras via Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) IG a écrit :
    > Dear
    Isabelle,
    >
    > Hope all is doing well on your side.
    >
    > We are
    working on the “draft” state of the abstract but we are not sure of what
    is the meaning of the first requested improvement. This session can’t be
    officially called a joint session because RDA is waiting something from
    the GO FAIR RDA IG so even if GO FAIR BiodiFAIRse IN & others GO FAIR
    people are involved in the session, we must resubmit “just” as a SHARC
    IG session?
    >
    > Don’t hesitate to come back to me for further
    questions.
    >
    > Wishing you a happy Christmas and end of year.
    >
    >
    Best,
    >
    > Yvan
    >
    > Le 23 déc. 2019 09:52, “IP2904 via Sharing Rewards
    and Credit (S HARC) IG” a écrit :
    >
    >> Dear
    Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) Interest Group and GO FAIR Interest
    Group,
    >>
    >> At its meeting on December 19, the RDA Technical Advisory
    Board considered your proposal for a session at Plenary 15 in 2020.
    >>
    >> Unfortunately, TAB IS NOT ABLE TO ACCEPT YOUR SESSION PROPOSAL
    UNLESS YOU MAKE THE CHANGES THAT ARE LISTED BELOW. IF YOU STILL WISH TO
    PROCEED YOU WILL NEED TO:
    >> 1. Update the session description to
    address TAB’s concerns BY OR BEFORE JAN 2ND, 2020
    >> 2. ADVISE
    ***@***.*** THAT YOU HAVE DONE THIS so TAB can review
    your response
    >>
    >> Requested improvements:
    >>
    >> -This is listed as
    a Joint Session of the SHARC IG (OK) and GO FAIR IG. This is not
    acceptable since TAB is still waiting for an update of the initial GO
    FAIR IG charter. This session should thus be resubmitted just as a
    session of the SHARC IG
    >> – The abstract looks like a draft, with lots
    of question marks and incomplete areas. This needs to be rectified
    before acceptance.
    >>
    >> Best regards,
    >>
    >> Isabelle Perseil, TAB
    co-chair
    >>
    >> —
    >> Full post:
    https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/data-conservation-ig/post/rda-p15-melb
    >>
    >>
    Stop emails for this post:
    https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/67308
    >> Full
    post:
    https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/sharing-rewards-and-credit-sharc-ig-go
    >>
    Manage my subscriptions: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist
    >>
    Stop emails for this post:
    https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/67309
    >
    Dear Yvan,
    As mentioned, TAB decided that this session should thus be
    resubmitted just as a session of the SHARC IG.
    Best Wishes et bon
    réveillon !
    Amicalement / Yours
    Isabelle
    Le 2019-12-24 17:12,
    ylebras via Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) IG a écrit :
    > Dear
    Isabelle,
    >
    > Hope all is doing well on your side.
    >
    > We are
    working on the “draft” state of the abstract but we are not sure of what
    is the meaning of the first requested improvement. This session can’t be
    officially called a joint session because RDA is waiting something from
    the GO FAIR RDA IG so even if GO FAIR BiodiFAIRse IN & others GO FAIR
    people are involved in the session, we must resubmit “just” as a SHARC
    IG session?
    >
    > Don’t hesitate to come back to me for further
    questions.
    >
    > Wishing you a happy Christmas and end of year.
    >
    >
    Best,
    >
    > Yvan
    >
    > Le 23 déc. 2019 09:52, “IP2904 via Sharing Rewards
    and Credit (S HARC) IG” a écrit :
    >
    >> Dear
    Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) Interest Group and GO FAIR Interest
    Group,
    >>
    >> At its meeting on December 19, the RDA Technical Advisory
    Board considered your proposal for a session at Plenary 15 in 2020.
    >>
    >> Unfortunately, TAB IS NOT ABLE TO ACCEPT YOUR SESSION PROPOSAL
    UNLESS YOU MAKE THE CHANGES THAT ARE LISTED BELOW. IF YOU STILL WISH TO
    PROCEED YOU WILL NEED TO:
    >> 1. Update the session description to
    address TAB’s concerns BY OR BEFORE JAN 2ND, 2020
    >> 2. ADVISE
    ***@***.*** THAT YOU HAVE DONE THIS so TAB can review
    your response
    >>
    >> Requested improvements:
    >>
    >> -This is listed as
    a Joint Session of the SHARC IG (OK) and GO FAIR IG. This is not
    acceptable since TAB is still waiting for an update of the initial GO
    FAIR IG charter. This session should thus be resubmitted just as a
    session of the SHARC IG
    >> – The abstract looks like a draft, with lots
    of question marks and incomplete areas. This needs to be rectified
    before acceptance.
    >>
    >> Best regards,
    >>
    >> Isabelle Perseil, TAB
    co-chair
    >>
    >> —
    >> Full post:
    https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/data-conservation-ig/post/rda-p15-melb
    >>
    Manage my subscriptions: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist
    >>
    Stop emails for this post:
    >> Full
    post:
    https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/sharing-rewards-and-credit-sharc-ig-go
    >>
    Manage my subscriptions: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist
    >>
    Stop emails for this post:
    https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/67309
    >
    Dear Yvan,
    As mentioned, TAB decided that this session should thus be
    resubmitted just as a session of the SHARC IG.
    Best Wishes et bon
    réveillon !
    Amicalement / Yours
    Isabelle
    Le 2019-12-24 17:12,
    ylebras via Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) IG a écrit :
    > Dear
    Isabelle,
    >
    > Hope all is doing well on your side.
    >
    > We are
    working on the “draft” state of the abstract but we are not sure of what
    is the meaning of the first requested improvement. This session can’t be
    officially called a joint session because RDA is waiting something from
    the GO FAIR RDA IG so even if GO FAIR BiodiFAIRse IN & others GO FAIR
    people are involved in the session, we must resubmit “just” as a SHARC
    IG session?
    >
    > Don’t hesitate to come back to me for further
    questions.
    >
    > Wishing you a happy Christmas and end of year.
    >
    >
    Best,
    >
    > Yvan
    >
    > Le 23 déc. 2019 09:52, “IP2904 via Sharing Rewards
    and Credit (S HARC) IG” a écrit :
    >
    >> Dear
    Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) Interest Group and GO FAIR Interest
    Group,
    >>
    >> At its meeting on December 19, the RDA Technical Advisory
    Board considered your proposal for a session at Plenary 15 in 2020.
    >>
    >> Unfortunately, TAB IS NOT ABLE TO ACCEPT YOUR SESSION PROPOSAL
    UNLESS YOU MAKE THE CHANGES THAT ARE LISTED BELOW. IF YOU STILL WISH TO
    PROCEED YOU WILL NEED TO:
    >> 1. Update the session description to
    address TAB’s concerns BY OR BEFORE JAN 2ND, 2020
    >> 2. ADVISE
    ***@***.*** THAT YOU HAVE DONE THIS so TAB can review
    your response
    >>
    >> Requested improvements:
    >>
    >> -This is listed as
    a Joint Session of the SHARC IG (OK) and GO FAIR IG. This is not
    acceptable since TAB is still waiting for an update of the initial GO
    FAIR IG charter. This session should thus be resubmitted just as a
    session of the SHARC IG
    >> – The abstract looks like a draft, with lots
    of question marks and incomplete areas. This needs to be rectified
    before acceptance.
    >>
    >> Best regards,
    >>
    >> Isabelle Perseil, TAB
    co-chair
    >>
    >> —
    >> Full post:
    https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/data-conservation-ig/post/rda-p15-melb
    >>
    Manage my subscriptions: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist
    >>
    Stop emails for this post:
    https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/67308
    >> Full
    post:
    >>
    Manage my subscriptions: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist
    >>
    Stop emails for this post:
    https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/67309
    >
    Dear Yvan,
    As mentioned, TAB decided that this session should thus be
    resubmitted just as a session of the SHARC IG.
    Best Wishes et bon
    réveillon !
    Amicalement / Yours
    Isabelle
    Le 2019-12-24 17:12,
    ylebras via Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) IG a écrit :
    > Dear
    Isabelle,
    >
    > Hope all is doing well on your side.
    >
    > We are
    working on the “draft” state of the abstract but we are not sure of what
    is the meaning of the first requested improvement. This session can’t be
    officially called a joint session because RDA is waiting something from
    the GO FAIR RDA IG so even if GO FAIR BiodiFAIRse IN & others GO FAIR
    people are involved in the session, we must resubmit “just” as a SHARC
    IG session?
    >
    > Don’t hesitate to come back to me for further
    questions.
    >
    > Wishing you a happy Christmas and end of year.
    >
    >
    Best,
    >
    > Yvan
    >
    > Le 23 déc. 2019 09:52, “IP2904 via Sharing Rewards
    and Credit (S HARC) IG” a écrit :
    >
    >> Dear
    Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) Interest Group and GO FAIR Interest
    Group,
    >>
    >> At its meeting on December 19, the RDA Technical Advisory
    Board considered your proposal for a session at Plenary 15 in 2020.
    >>
    >> Unfortunately, TAB IS NOT ABLE TO ACCEPT YOUR SESSION PROPOSAL
    UNLESS YOU MAKE THE CHANGES THAT ARE LISTED BELOW. IF YOU STILL WISH TO
    PROCEED YOU WILL NEED TO:
    >> 1. Update the session description to
    address TAB’s concerns BY OR BEFORE JAN 2ND, 2020
    >> 2. ADVISE
    ***@***.*** THAT YOU HAVE DONE THIS so TAB can review
    your response
    >>
    >> Requested improvements:
    >>
    >> -This is listed as
    a Joint Session of the SHARC IG (OK) and GO FAIR IG. This is not
    acceptable since TAB is still waiting for an update of the initial GO
    FAIR IG charter. This session should thus be resubmitted just as a
    session of the SHARC IG
    >> – The abstract looks like a draft, with lots
    of question marks and incomplete areas. This needs to be rectified
    before acceptance.
    >>
    >> Best regards,
    >>
    >> Isabelle Perseil, TAB
    co-chair
    >>
    >> —
    >> Full post:
    https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/data-conservation-ig/post/rda-p15-melb
    >>
    Manage my subscriptions: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist
    >>
    Stop emails for this post:
    https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/67308
    >> Full
    post:
    https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/sharing-rewards-and-credit-sharc-ig-go
    >>
    >>
    Stop emails for this post:
    https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/67309
    >
    Dear Yvan,
    As mentioned, TAB decided that this session should thus be
    resubmitted just as a session of the SHARC IG.
    Best Wishes et bon
    réveillon !
    Amicalement / Yours
    Isabelle
    Le 2019-12-24 17:12,
    ylebras via Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) IG a écrit :
    > Dear
    Isabelle,
    >
    > Hope all is doing well on your side.
    >
    > We are
    working on the “draft” state of the abstract but we are not sure of what
    is the meaning of the first requested improvement. This session can’t be
    officially called a joint session because RDA is waiting something from
    the GO FAIR RDA IG so even if GO FAIR BiodiFAIRse IN & others GO FAIR
    people are involved in the session, we must resubmit “just” as a SHARC
    IG session?
    >
    > Don’t hesitate to come back to me for further
    questions.
    >
    > Wishing you a happy Christmas and end of year.
    >
    >
    Best,
    >
    > Yvan
    >
    > Le 23 déc. 2019 09:52, “IP2904 via Sharing Rewards
    and Credit (S HARC) IG” a écrit :
    >
    >> Dear
    Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) Interest Group and GO FAIR Interest
    Group,
    >>
    >> At its meeting on December 19, the RDA Technical Advisory
    Board considered your proposal for a session at Plenary 15 in 2020.
    >>
    >> Unfortunately, TAB IS NOT ABLE TO ACCEPT YOUR SESSION PROPOSAL
    UNLESS YOU MAKE THE CHANGES THAT ARE LISTED BELOW. IF YOU STILL WISH TO
    PROCEED YOU WILL NEED TO:
    >> 1. Update the session description to
    address TAB’s concerns BY OR BEFORE JAN 2ND, 2020
    >> 2. ADVISE
    ***@***.*** THAT YOU HAVE DONE THIS so TAB can review
    your response
    >>
    >> Requested improvements:
    >>
    >> -This is listed as
    a Joint Session of the SHARC IG (OK) and GO FAIR IG. This is not
    acceptable since TAB is still waiting for an update of the initial GO
    FAIR IG charter. This session should thus be resubmitted just as a
    session of the SHARC IG
    >> – The abstract looks like a draft, with lots
    of question marks and incomplete areas. This needs to be rectified
    before acceptance.
    >>
    >> Best regards,
    >>
    >> Isabelle Perseil, TAB
    co-chair
    >>
    >> —
    >> Full post:
    https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/data-conservation-ig/post/rda-p15-melb
    >>
    Manage my subscriptions: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist
    >>
    Stop emails for this post:
    https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/67308
    >> Full
    post:
    https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/sharing-rewards-and-credit-sharc-ig-go
    >>
    Manage my subscriptions: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist
    >>
    Stop emails for this post:
    >

Log in to reply.