Skip to main content

Notice

The new RDA web platform is still being rolled out. Existing RDA members PLEASE REACTIVATE YOUR ACCOUNT using this link: https://rda-login.wicketcloud.com/users/confirmation. Please report bugs, broken links and provide your feedback using the UserSnap tool on the bottom right corner of each page. Stay updated about the web site milestones at https://www.rd-alliance.org/rda-web-platform-upcoming-features-and-functionalities/.

Analysis of existing assessment tools as an RDA supporting output

  • Creator
    Discussion
  • #108560

    Keith Russell
    Participant

    Hi members of the RDA FAIR maturity working group,
    We have now published the results of an Analysis of Existing FAIR
    Assessment Tools on the RDA website as a supporting output of the working
    group. This will be open for comment more broadly also beyond the working
    group.
    https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/fair-data-maturity-model-wg/outcomes/r
    The work can be referenced, we are just finalising the citation.
    Kind regards,
    Keith
    Keith Russell
    Manager Engagements
    *P* +61 3 9905 6273
    *M* +61 427 452 342
    ***@***.***
    ardc.edu.au
    Monash University
    Building T, Ground Floor
    100 Sir John Monash Drive, Caulfield East VIC 3145, AUSTRALIA
    PO Box 197, Caulfield East VIC 3145, AUSTRALIA
    ARDC acknowledges the Traditional Owners of the lands
    that we live and work on across Australia and pays its respect
    to Elders past and present.
    Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

  • Author
    Replies
  • #130556

    Barend Mons
    Member

    Hi, nice reading for Monday morning in the train..:)
    Great start, really, I like the visuals also very much and the cross analysis of tools is very important.
    Of course I also have some constructive comments:
    The most important one is that I like the notion of ‘beyond FAIR’ (in fact all kinds of additional implementation choices one can make once data is FAIR. Actually some of these choices can also be made for Re-useless (non FAIR) data. They can be intrinsically of high quality and in a perfect CTS repository forever, without ever be found, accessed, interoperated and re-used by any analytics algorithm (or human user for that matter).
    The term ‘non-FAIR principles’ seems highly ambiguous to me. On the one hand, I agree that these ‘choices’ are not ‘intrinsic’ to the FAIR principles, but for instance, anyone would broadly agree that the R (en end to which F, A, and I, serve) will be jeopardized if the data (for instance) are in a repository that is professorware and ‘down half the time’.
    So my suggestion is to change that column in the very nice graphic to: ‘Choices Beyond FAIR’
    Will read more carefully later
    Compliments for what came out of this group so far !!!
    Prof. Barend Mons
    Leiden University Medical Center
    President of CODATA
    GO FAIR international Support and coordination office
    Mail: ***@***.***-fair.org
    +31624879779
    ORCID: 0000-0003-3934-0072
    sent from my IPad

Log in to reply.