What are you looking for?
Interest Group Other Output March 10, 2026

An analysis of crosswalks from research data schemas to Schema.org

  • Output Type: Interest Group Other Output
  • DOI: doi:10.1162/dint_a_00186
  • Regions: Global
  • Primary Domain: Domain Agnostic
  • RDA Pathways: Semantics, Ontology, Standardisation
  • Group Technology Focus: Search & Discovery
  • Stakeholders: Infrastructure Providers
  • Sustainable Development Goals: Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure
  • Language: English

Abstract

The increased number of data repositories has greatly increased the availability of open data. To enable
broad discovery and access to research dataset, some data repositories have begun leveraging the web
architecture by embedding structured metadata markup in dataset web landing pages using vocabularies
from Schema.org and extensions. This paper aims to examine metadata interoperability for supporting global
data discovery. Specifically, the paper reports a survey on which metadata schema has been adopted by
participating data repositories, and presents an analysis of crosswalks from fourteen research data schemas
to Schema.org. The analysis indicates most descriptive metadata are interoperable among the schemas, the
most inconsistent mapping is the rights metadata, and a large gap exists in the structural metadata and
controlled vocabularies to specify various property values. The analysis and collated crosswalks can serve as
a reference for data repositories when they develop crosswalks from their own schemas to Schema.org, and
provide the research data community a benchmark of structured metadata implementation.

Citations

Wu, M.F., Richard, S.M., Verhey, C., et al.: An analysis of crosswalks from research data schemas to Schema.org. Data
Intelligence 5(1), 100-121 (2023). doi:10.1162/dint_a_00186

Comments

  • Profile Picture

    June 16, 2026 at 11:58 am

    Linda Angulo Lopez says:

    Codemeta: [Call for volunteers: new crosswalks for research data schemas #485](https://github.com/codemeta/codemeta/discussions/485)

You must be logged in or join the group to leave a comment.