What are you looking for?
Group Session November 21, 2025

From Ethics to Tools: AI Governance in Support of Research Data Resilience

Plenary: RDA 26th Plenary Meeting (VP26)

Submitted by

Meeting objectives

Collaborative session notes:

Open session notes

Description
Artificial intelligence is now embedded in every layer of the research data ecosystem, from data preparation and curation to federated access, visiting-data models, and automated decision-making in secure processing environments. As systems move rapidly from prototype to production, the need for clear, actionable AI governance frameworks has become central to research data resilience. This session examines how ethics, governance, and technical implementation intersect to support trustworthy AI systems capable of interacting with sensitive, distributed, and policy-constrained datasets.
Drawing from recent work of the EOSC-Future/RDA Artificial Intelligence and Data Visitation Working Group (AIDV-WG), the discussion brings together policy, ethics, and technical insights from: the DV4RDA initiative and the FAIRlyz platform for biomedical data sharing and analysis; guidance for ethics committees and informed consent in AI and data visitation; emerging legal foundations for secure processing environments; federated and visiting-data architectures explored in ‘Geographies of Trust’; and the AIDV-WG’s shared citation library documenting global developments in AI oversight. The session focuses on how AI governance can strengthen resilience by ensuring continuity of access, maintaining trust in data flows, and enabling responsible automation across research infrastructures.
Participants will explore how governance frameworks translate into operational tools, how federated and visiting-data models challenge established ethics and compliance practices, and how communities can coordinate governance approaches that both enable innovation and protect sensitive data. The session encourages dialogue on developing shared RDA principles for AI governance in support of resilient, trustworthy, and interoperable research data ecosystems.
Principal Objective
To explore how ethics-aligned AI governance frameworks (supported by practical tools, platforms, and legal foundations) can enhance research data resilience and continuity, and to assess how the Research Data Alliance can support the further development of guidance and tools in this domain.
Supporting Objectives
1. Examine how federated and visiting-data models reshape governance requirements by drawing on insights from the AIDV-WG’s Geographies of Trust report, including the challenges of cross-jurisdictional data flows, distributed responsibilities, and new trust relationships between humans, systems, and autonomous agents.
2. Showcase practical examples of ethics-aligned tools and platforms (including the DV4RDA project and FAIRlyz) that demonstrate how governance, secure access, and AI-assisted analysis can be operationalized for biomedical and other sensitive research data domains.
3. Bridge ethics and implementation by examining how frameworks such as the AIDV-WG’s Guidance for Ethics Committees Reviewing AI and Data Visitation, Guidance for Informed Consent, and the AI Bill of Rights Recommendations can be translated into actionable practices, workflows, and risk controls during system deployment.
4. Explore pathways for moving AI systems from prototype to production based on insights from the Kaggle ‘Prototype to Production’ report, with attention to reproducibility, safety, reliability, and the governance mechanisms needed to support long-term continuity.
5. Discuss legal and policy foundations coherent governance models that allow computation to move to the data, preserve privacy, and maintain research continuity during disruptions.
6. Consider how shared knowledge resources, such as the AIDV-WG Shared Citation Library, can support community learning, harmonisation of governance practices, and development of interoperable approaches across global research infrastructures.
7. Identify RDA community priorities interests in the development AI governance aimed at supporting coordinated development of guidelines, policy recommendations, digital instruments.

Meeting presenters

Francis P. Crawley, Patricia Buendia

Meeting agenda

90-minute agenda
Welcome, framing, and objectives (10 minutes)
• Overview of the session theme and relevance to research data resilience
• Brief orientation to AI governance challenges across federated and visiting-data models
• Outline of session goals and expected outcomes
2. Scene-setting presentation: the governance landscape (10 minutes)
• Introduction to governance needs in federated, distributed, and visiting-data ecosystems
• Key insights from ‘Geographies of Trust’ and emerging cross-jurisdictional challenges
3. Demonstration and tooling showcase (15 minutes)
• Operational examples from DV4RDA and the FAIRlyz platform
• Illustration of how governance, secure access, and AI-assisted analysis can be applied in practice
• Discussion of prototype-to-production considerations for trustworthy AI workflows
4. Panel: bridging ethics, law, and implementation (20 minutes)
• Ethics committee guidance for AI and data visitation
• Informed consent challenges for AI-enabled systems
• Legal and policy foundations for secure processing environments
• Translating AI governance principles into actionable tools, workflows, and risk controls
5. Community discussion and synthesis (20 minutes)
• Open discussion on challenges, opportunities, and gaps
• Data continuity and resilience: what governance mechanisms matter most?
• Role of shared resources such as the AIDV-WG Shared Citation Library
6. Polling and exploration of next steps (10 minutes)
• Interactive poll on community priorities
• Assessment of interest in developing RDA guidance, tools, policy recommendations, and governance models
• Discussion of future RDA contributions to AI governance embedded in policy and tools based on ‘The ENVISAGE Principles and PILOT Principles for AI Governance’
7. Summary and closing (5 minutes)
• Key takeaways
• Next steps and opportunities to stay engaged

Target audience

The target audience for this session includes researchers, data stewards, repository managers, policymakers, ethics and legal experts, and technical professionals involved in the design, governance, and operation of AI-enabled research data infrastructures. It is particularly relevant to those working with federated data access models, secure processing environments, biomedical and sensitive data governance, and the development or oversight of autonomous or semi-autonomous AI systems. Members of RDA Interest Groups and Working Groups focused on data policy, interoperability, machine-actionable governance, and responsible AI will find the session valuable, as will early career practitioners seeking to understand the emerging interface between ethics, law, and technical implementation in support of research data resilience.

Group Activities and Scope

The activities and scope of this group focus on advancing understanding and practice at the intersection of artificial intelligence, data visitation, and research data governance. Building on the work of the EOSC-Future/RDA Artificial Intelligence and Data Visitation Working Group (AIDV-WG), the group explores how AI systems interact with sensitive, distributed, and policy-constrained datasets and how governance frameworks can support resilience, continuity, and trust in these environments. Activities include analysing federated and visiting-data models, examining ethical and legal challenges, and reviewing emerging tools and platforms such as DV4RDA and FAIRlyz that operationalize secure, governed AI-assisted data access.
The group also considers guidance for ethics committees, informed consent processes, and the development of legal foundations for secure processing environments. Its scope includes harmonising governance practices, assessing risks associated with prototype-to-production AI transitions, and identifying community needs for shared recommendations, policy models, and machine-actionable governance tools. The overarching aim is to support coordinated, ethics-aligned approaches that enable responsible AI use while strengthening research data resilience across global infrastructures.

Additional links to informative material

• Unlocking Biomedical Data Potential: The DV4RDA Project and the FAIRlyz Platform for Enhanced Data Sharing, Analysis, and Community Engagement (https://docs.google.com/document/d/1F4n1f0Aq4tX3yOfTk1ds3JWx7q9Ma5Fg6OXI0NI5bdI/edit?tab=t.0)
• Buendia, P., Kim, S., Meyers, N., Crawley, F. P., Farrell, G., Purian, R., & RDA Artificial Intelligence & Data Visitation WG. (2025). Geographies of Trust: AI, Biomedicine, and the Next Era of Federated and Visiting Data Models (1.0). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16929066
• Prototype to Production | Kaggle (https://www.kaggle.com/whitepaper-prototype-to-production)
• Guidance for Ethics Committees Reviewing Artificial Intelligence and Data Visitation (https://www.rd-alliance.org/groups/artificial-intelligence-and-data-visitation-aidv-wg/outputs?output=165867)
• Guidance for Informed Consent in the context of Artificial Intelligence and Data Visitation (https://www.rd-alliance.org/groups/artificial-intelligence-and-data-visitation-aidv-wg/outputs?output=143365)
• AI Bill of Rights Recommendation (https://www.rd-alliance.org/groups/artificial-intelligence-and-data-visitation-aidv-wg/outputs?output=165995)
• Secure Processing Environments for Open Science: Proposing Legal Foundations (https://www.rd-alliance.org/groups/artificial-intelligence-and-data-visitation-aidv-wg/outputs?output=175108)
• AIDV-WG Shared Citation Library (https://www.rd-alliance.org/groups/artificial-intelligence-and-data-visitation-aidv-wg/outputs?output=165997)

Short Group Status

This group has been active for three years and has produced a significant body of work at the intersection of artificial intelligence, data visitation, ethics, and research data governance. Its outputs include guidance for ethics committees reviewing AI and data visitation, informed consent recommendations, AI Bill of Rights–aligned principles, legal foundations for secure processing environments, and the Geographies of Trust analysis of federated and visiting-data models. The group has also contributed to community tools such as the FAIRlyz platform and the DV4RDA initiative, as well as maintaining a shared citation library to support ongoing research and harmonisation efforts. Building on these achievements, the group is now engaging the community to identify priorities for future development of governance frameworks, digital tools, and coordinated RDA activities that strengthen research data resilience.

Applicable Pathways

Data Infrastructures and Environments - Generalist
AI meets data: exploring use cases, applications and innovation
Ethical data

What potential collaborations or synergies do you see between your Group/Birds of a Feather session topic and other RDA Groups or external organisations?

Complex Citation Implementation Interest Group (CCI IG)
Active Data Management Plans IG
Building Immune Digital Twins WG
Digital Twins IG
International Science Council (ISC) [https://council.science/], UNESCO [https://www.unesco.org/], Global Open Science Cloud (GOSC) [https://gosc.cstr.cn/], African Open Science Cloud (AOSC) [https://aosc.africa/], T2P Center for Health Ethics Training & Consultancy [VizAfrica [https://vizafrica.sarima.co.za/], CODATA [https://codata.org/], Australian Research Data Commons (ARDC) [https://ardc.edu.au/]; UNESCO-CODATA project on 'Developing Data Policies for Times of Crisis Facilitated by Open Science (DPTC)'for

Please indicate at least (3) three breakout slots that would suit your meeting.

Breakout 1. Monday, 16 March, 13:30-15:00 UTC
Breakout 4. Tuesday, 17 March, 13:30-15:00 UTC
Breakout 9. Thursday, 19 March, 07:00-08:30 UTC