Agenda
- Summary from last time
- Discussion
- Next steps
Materials
[1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/13BBJ_G-eprhRadIwtDm-GY1duwP7SkrAf8aAvxF4jl0/edit?usp=sharing
[2] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VmmhNMl4ie5zqbCKkf3NDNRHtgdb2SgYF_cEn58zt7g/edit?usp=sharing
[3] https://docs.google.com/document/d/155lA2BcixTl-zwJHGfLkxsmg7WmQbBK00QWyP8QggkE/edit
Topic 1
- Aim for adoptable recommendation
- Start document for next deliverable (done)
- Created slack team for direct communication (done)
- Send around collection of data packaging formats for content exchange (done)
Topic 2
- Do we have preservation systems in mind, e.g. ApTrust (institutional preservation systems)?
- https://github.com/NCSU-Libraries/APTrust-Bagit
- Not primary, but they may also benefit from recommendations
- If there are major differences, they could be covered in a follow up group
- Dat projects/IPFS
- Lack of packaging description
- Maybe extend use cases?
- Existing use cases are challenging enough for this WG, maybe in follow up group
- BagIt usable for syntactic interoperability
- ORE + BagIt = next level to introduce semantics
- Invite DataOne or Research Objects people to group meetings?
- Check primer for contacts
- https://gitter.im/ResearchObject/ResearchObject
- BagIt and Datacite quite common and might be applicable to legacy platforms, so what about recommending:
- Generic bag + Datacite as minimum requirement (à positive feedback in round)
- Define extension points for special needs, e.g. ORE
- TODO: Check existing packaging formats from list for applicability
- TODO: Put ideas about format description to the recommendations document
- TODO: Try to invite adopters of packaging formats for information exchange
Topic 3
- Next meeting at 2 August 2017
- 1801 reads