AW: [rda-legalinterop-ig] anybody out there
-
Discussion
-
Did I miss our conference?
I thought we start at 3 PM CET.
Christoph Bruch
Helmholtz Association
Helmholtz Open Science Coordination Office
http://os.helmholtz.de
W: +49 (0)331 28 82 87 61
M: +49 (0)151 14 09 39 68
Von: christoph.bruch=***@***.***-groups.org [mailto:***@***.***-groups.org] Im Auftrag von bruch
Gesendet: Freitag, 16. Dezember 2016 15:02
An: ‘RDA/CODATA Legal Interoperability IG’
Betreff: [rda-legalinterop-ig] [rda-legalinterop-ig] legal requirements concerning ownership of open science infrastructures
Dear All,
During our last conference call I promised to write a few sentences about what I have in mind when I talk about possible requirements of infrastructures in order to qualify as open science infrastructures.
The basic thinking behind this is, that I would like to see as much research publications and research data freely available – permanently.
Our principles focus on research data, not on the infrastructures which are holding them.
There is one “in-between”: database protection.
I would like to add a focus on requirements concerning the ownership / legal structure / corresponding legal guaranties that are to ensure long term availability of the content.
For illustration I add 2 links
https://blogs.ch.cam.ac.uk/pmr/2015/04/23/is-figshare-open-it-is-not-jus…
https://vre.leidenuniv.nl/vre/lrd/Pages/information-sheet.aspx?item=56
The first is a blog post by Peter Murray-Rust on “Is figshare open?”
The second is an information sheet of University of Leiden on Figshare
Figshare is only an example. I do not mean to pick on this endeavour.
According to my understanding the take home messages / questions concerning figshare are:
Its ownership is somewhat blurry.
This could be considered to be not a big deal as all data in Figshare can be downloaded.
Is this a realistic perspective or are we stuck with an infrastructure like this once it reaches a certain size?
With what definitions of open science / open science infrastructures are endeavours like Figshare compatible?
Regards,
Christoph
Christoph Bruch
Helmholtz Association
Helmholtz Open Science Coordination Office
http://os.helmholtz.de
W: +49 (0)331 28 82 87 61
M: +49 (0)151 14 09 39 68
Von: asha=***@***.***-groups.org [mailto:***@***.***-groups.org] Im Auftrag von alaw
Gesendet: Freitag, 9. Dezember 2016 14:18
An: RDA/CODATA Legal Interoperability IG; Asha CODATA
Betreff: [rda-legalinterop-ig] RDA Legal Interoperability – CALL next Friday- 16 December (15.00 CET / 14.00 UTC / 9am Eastern)
Dear All,
Please find below gotomeeting details and a calendar invite to add the same to your local calendar tool.
CODATA-RDA Legal Interoperability Calls
Please join my meeting from your computer, tablet or smartphone. https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/882649949
You can also dial in using your phone. France (Toll-free): 0 805 541 043
France : +33 (0) 170 950 589
Access Code: 882-649-949
More phone numbers United States : +1 (669) 224-3318
United States (Toll-free): 1 866 899 4679
Austria (Toll-free): 0 800 202144
Austria : +43 1 2530 22500
Canada (Toll-free): 1 888 299 1889
Canada : +1 (647) 497-9379
Germany (Toll-free): 0 800 723 5120
Germany : +49 (0) 692 5736 7301
Netherlands (Toll-free): 0 800 022 6321
Netherlands : +31 (0) 207 941 375
Spain (Toll-free): 800 900 578
Spain : +34 932 75 1230
United Kingdom (Toll-free): 0 800 389 5272
United Kingdom : +44 (0) 330 221 0099
Thanks,
Asha
—
Asha Law | Program Assistant, CODATA | http://www.codata.org
E-Mail: ***@***.***
Tel (Office): +33 1 45 25 04 96
CODATA (Committee on Data of the International Council for Science), 5 rue Auguste Vacquerie, 75016 Paris, FRANCE
Log in to reply.