AW: [i-adopt] Framework discussion

Hi all,
according to Gwen,
Interoperability Framework would be correct as framework is defined as (Cambridge dictionary) “a supporting structure around which something can be built or a system of rules, ideas, or beliefs that is used to plan or decide something”.
So we leave it as Interoperability Framework and keep things simple.
Best regards,
Barbara
Gesendet von Mail für Windows 10
Von: lucia.mona via InteroperAble Descriptions of Observable Property Terminology WG (I-ADOPT WG)
Gesendet: Montag, 21. Oktober 2019 09:15
An: ***@***.***-groups.org
Betreff: Re: [i-adopt] Framework discussion
Dear Barbara
I also prefer the option 2.
Ciao
Lucia
Dr. Lucia Mona
CNR-IMAA
C.da S. Loja
I- 85050 Tito Scalo (PZ)
Italy
Phone: +39 0971427257
Fax: +39 0971427271
Il 20/10/2019 10:43, mabablue via InteroperAble Descriptions of Observable Property Terminology WG (I-ADOPT WG) ha scritto:
Hi again,
Markus just told me that Interoperability Framework is no longer reserved for KOINE as this seems no more the target of upcoming calls…
So we could use:
1. conceptual framework for interoperable observable property terminology
2. Conceptual Interoperability Framework (CIP) for observable property terminology
3. Reference Model for an Interoperability Framework for observable property terminology
So I definitively prefer 2: Conceptual Interoperability Framework for observable property terminology.
Any preferences are welcome!
Sorry for this avalanche of emails on a Sunday… I extended the deadline to tomorrow morning 10:00 (CEST), then I have definetively to return the refined case statement to the TAB.
The updated case statement can be found in this folder:
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1XwAqLQFUDXwlW3_6OCiTOKnQkAq3Bxbt
Cheers,
Barbara
Gesendet von Mail für Windows 10
Von: Magagna Barbara
Gesendet: Sonntag, 20. Oktober 2019 08:55
An: ***@***.***-groups.org
Betreff: Updates regarding Case Statement and Work Plan
Wichtigkeit: Hoch
Hi all,
there are two issues that I want to highlight.
1. There was a main concern expressed by Michael Diepenbroek. He thinks we won‘t be able to develop an interoperability framework without fundings.
Well I must admit that this term is not well defined and could be interpreted differently. What is meant here is a conceptual framework, not a technical implementation. Also Interoperability Framework is a term used in the KOINE proposal, which might be resubmitted and we don’t want to use this outside that consortium. So I would suggest to use instead: conceptual framework for interoperable observable property terminology. I hope you can agree. If you have strong arguments against this term please write back to me with a better suggestion to be used in the case statement preferrably before midnight (CEST) this eveining, but at latest by tomorrow 10:00.
2. I am revising the work plan and templates for collecting user stories and semantic representations till Thursday 24 Oct, please check this document, if you want to contribute and review: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qRU891S9-nXMzJiPWFsucIwNDDIq6oAG35PF...
Thanks!!
Best regards,
Barbara
Gesendet von Mail für Windows 10
--
Full post: https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/interoperable-descriptions-observable-...
Manage my subscriptions: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist
Stop emails for this post: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/65947
[https://ipmcdn.avast.com/images/icons/icon-envelope-tick-round-orange-an... Mail priva di virus. www.avast.com