Dear Members of the RDA FAIR Data Maturity Model WG,
As announced in the virtual workshop #8 earlier this week, we have created a
set of GitHub issues for proposed changes to the priorities of some
indicators. See:
https://github.com/RDA-FAIR/FAIR-data-maturity-model-WG/issues/52
Some of the proposed changes were supported by 50% or more of testers, while
others only had minority support.
For the ones for which 50% or more of the testers agreed, we created
individual issues:
* Downgrade priority of
Wmeg/edit#bookmark=id.dzkivh1o6z2t> F1-01D Data is identified by a
persistent identifier from Essential to Important. Issue #53
* Upgrade priority of
Wmeg/edit#bookmark=id.q5smlxhg0gqv> F3-01M Metadata includes the identifier
for the data from Important to Essential. Issue #54
* Upgrade priority of
Wmeg/edit#bookmark=id.gzx5w0ywttxs> A1-03M Metadata is accessed through
standardised protocol from Important to Essential. Issue #55
* Downgrade priority of
Wmeg/edit#bookmark=id.wt6btndfxohs> I3-01D Data includes references to other
data from Important to Useful. Issue #56
Please comment on those in the individual issues. We propose to implement
them if there are no objections expressed in the GitHub issues.
The following ones got less than 50% support. We did not create separate
issues for them.
* Downgrade priority of
Wmeg/edit#bookmark=id.940a2vpo22m> F1-01M Metadata is identified by a
persistent identifier from Essential to Important
* Upgrade priority of
Wmeg/edit#bookmark=id.otsg5mkae4mf> A1-04D Data is accessible through
standardised protocol from Important to Essential
* Downgrade priority of
Wmeg/edit#bookmark=id.lljkagix6dmc> I1-01M Metadata uses knowledge
representation expressed in standardised format from Essential to Important
* Upgrade priority of
Wmeg/edit#bookmark=id.b65kvb34y1gk> I2-01M Metadata uses standard
vocabularies from Important to Essential (but note issue
#41 that
proposes this indicator to be out of scope)
* Upgrade priority of
Wmeg/edit#bookmark=id.ihwwf7ovcrj> I2-01D Data uses standard vocabularies
from Important to Essential (but note issue
#41 that
proposes this indicator to be out of scope)
* Upgrade priority of
Wmeg/edit#bookmark=id.3ue9sgd0cuyx> R1.3-01M Metadata complies with a
community standard from Important to Essential
* Upgrade priority of
Wmeg/edit#bookmark=id.4vb3p5gd03bw> R1.3-01D Data complies with a community
standard from Important to Essential
* Upgrade priority of
Wmeg/edit#bookmark=id.pvlymb71luv8> R1.3-02M Metadata is expressed in
compliance with a machine-understandable community standard from Important
to Essential
For the proposals that did not get majority support, we propose not to
implement the changes unless there is strong support.
For any general remarks about the proposals and comments on the ones that
did not get majority support, please comment at issue #52
.
Looking forward to your comments!
Kind regards, Makx Dekkers and the editorial team