Further information and GitHub issues
-
Discussion
-
Dear members of the RDA FAIR Data Maturity Model Working Group,
Since the first online meetings on 21 and 22 February 2019 (slides and
report here ), the editor team has
continued working on analysing existing FAIR assessment approaches.
Based on further contributions to the survey
l97HOBH4/edit#gid=0> , we have taken into account are the NCEI/CICS-NC Data
Stewardship Maturity Matrix
, the
WMO Stewardship Maturity Matrix for Climate Data (SMM-CD)
Climate_Data/7006028> and the NCEI/ESIP-DSC Data Use and Services Maturity
Matrix
855020> . These additional approaches have been included in the five slide
decks on GitHub
%20of%20preliminary%20analysis/v0.02> :
* Findable
%20of%20preliminary%20analysis/v0.02/FAIR_Principles_Findable_v0.02.pdf>
* Accessible
%20of%20preliminary%20analysis/v0.02/FAIR_Principles_Accessible_v0.02.pdf>
* Interoperable
>
* Reusable
%20of%20preliminary%20analysis/v0.02/FAIR_Principles_Reusable_v0.02.pdf>
* Beyond the FAIR principles
%20of%20preliminary%20analysis/v0.02/FAIR_Principles_X_v0.02.pdf>
You are very welcome to review these documents and create issues on GitHub
if you
have comments or suggestions or if you see anything that we have
misunderstood in classifying the questions under the FAIR principles.
I would also like to remind you that we created issues on GitHub that are
open for comments in order to gather ideas and opinions on:
* What would be the format of the assessment?
* To whom would the results be targeted?
* What will be the profile of the respondent?
* What would be the essential criteria to be FAIR?
* RDA FAIR data maturity model WG: Methodology
&
Timeline
* What will be the nature of the assessment?
* When will the FAIRness be assessed?
* What would be the assessed entity?
* Reusable
%20of%20preliminary%20analysis/v0.02/FAIR_Principles_Reusable_v0.02.pdf>
* Beyond the FAIR principles
%20of%20preliminary%20analysis/v0.02/FAIR_Principles_X_v0.02.pdf>
You are very welcome to review these documents and create issues on GitHub
if you
have comments or suggestions or if you see anything that we have
misunderstood in classifying the questions under the FAIR principles.
I would also like to remind you that we created issues on GitHub that are
open for comments in order to gather ideas and opinions on:
* What would be the format of the assessment?
* To whom would the results be targeted?
* What will be the profile of the respondent?
* What would be the essential criteria to be FAIR?
* RDA FAIR data maturity model WG: Methodology
&
Timeline
* What will be the nature of the assessment?
* When will the FAIRness be assessed?
* What would be the assessed entity?
We will summarise the contributions on these issues, and any further issues
created on GitHub, before the face-to-face meeting in Philadelphia on 3
April 2019, in order for the group to take decisions on the scope and the
methodology for the work going forward.
Please don’t hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns.
Many thanks for your consideration!
Kind regards, Makx Dekkers and the editor team
Log in to reply.