Skip to main content

Notice

We are in the process of rolling out a soft launch of the RDA website, which includes a new member platform. Existing RDA members PLEASE REACTIVATE YOUR ACCOUNT using this link: https://rda-login.wicketcloud.com/users/confirmation. Visitors may encounter functionality issues with group pages, navigation, missing content, broken links, etc. As you explore the new site, please provide your feedback using the UserSnap tool on the bottom right corner of each page. Thank you for your understanding and support as we work through all issues as quickly as possible. Stay updated about upcoming features and functionalities: https://www.rd-alliance.org/rda-web-platform-upcoming-features-and-functionalities/

Who We Are
What We Do
What We Work On
Get Involved
Events
RDA Groups
News & Media

FAIR data maturity model WG: Prioritisation & Scoring – Invitation to contribute!

  • Creator
    Discussion
  • October 2, 2019 at 8:29 pm #73230

    Christophe
    Member

    Dear members of the FAIR data maturity model Working Group, Over the past month and a half, we have had lively and fruitful discussions about the indicators and their prioritisation. However, we have not yet reached a consensus. As a consequence, to facilitate this process, we have put together a quick survey where we solely ask your opinion about the priority of each and every current 53 indicators. Your answers will allow us to better understand and gather all different views, but also allow us to propose a final set of priorities for the next workshop in Helsinki. Please share with us your opinion about the prioritisation of indicators[1]. We thank you in advance for devoting 5 minutes of your time to the survey. No account nor registration is need. As a next step towards a common set of assessment criteria, we started to explore a scoring mechanism relying on the FAIRness indicators and their prioritisation. The underlying idea is to assess and objectively score the implementation level of the FAIR principles. We have created a thread in GitHub[2] to discuss this matter. We invite all members of the Working Group to comment on that proposal on GitHub and to suggest changes in the approach. Also, don’t hesitate to comment on any other aspect of the work of the editorial team! Kind regards, The editorial team [1] https://forms.gle/uWXpT27i2RiSei5V7 [2] https://github.com/RDA-FAIR/FAIR-data-maturity-model-WG/issues/34 

  • Creator
    Discussion
  • Author
    Replies
  • October 4, 2019 at 12:47 pm #91877

    Romain
    Member

    Dear colleague
    Laurence and I have completed your survey in line with our SHARC FAIR criteria assesment template
    (as a reminder available here:
    https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1vloqbekIGlqiDwzE9jqZzoaoDCbwYQlx…?
    )
    Best regards
    Romain
    Romain DAVID
    Ingénieur de Recherche / Reaserch Fellow
    ***@***.***
    Tel./Phone : 04.99.61.2070
    Tel. Secrétariat/Secretarial office phone : 04.99.61.24.28
    INRA – Centre de recherche de Montpellier
    UMR Mistea (Bâtiment 29)
    2 Place Pierre Vialia
    34060 Montpellier Cedex 2
    France
    http://www6.montpellier.inra.fr/mistea/
    http://www.inra.fr/
    ________________________________
    De : ***@***.***-groups.org de la part de ChrisB via FAIR Data Maturity Model WG
    Envoyé : mercredi 2 octobre 2019 22:29
    À : ***@***.***-groups.org
    Objet : [fair_maturity] FAIR data maturity model WG: Prioritisation & Scoring – Invitation to contribute!
    Dear members of the FAIR data maturity model Working Group,
    Over the past month and a half, we have had lively and fruitful discussions about the indicators and their prioritisation. However, we have not yet reached a consensus. As a consequence, to facilitate this process, we have put together a quick survey where we solely ask your opinion about the priority of each and every current 53 indicators.
    Your answers will allow us to better understand and gather all different views, but also allow us to propose a final set of priorities for the next workshop in Helsinki.
    Please share with us your opinion about the prioritisation of indicators[1]. We thank you in advance for devoting 5 minutes of your time to the survey. No account nor registration is need.
    As a next step towards a common set of assessment criteria, we started to explore a scoring mechanism relying on the FAIRness indicators and their prioritisation. The underlying idea is to assess and objectively score the implementation level of the FAIR principles.
    We have created a thread in GitHub[2] to discuss this matter. We invite all members of the Working Group to comment on that proposal on GitHub and to suggest changes in the approach.
    Also, don’t hesitate to comment on any other aspect of the work of the editorial team!
    Kind regards,
    The editorial team
    [1] https://forms.gle/uWXpT27i2RiSei5V7
    [2] https://github.com/RDA-FAIR/FAIR-data-maturity-model-WG/issues/34
    Christophe Bahim
    PwC | Technology Consulting | Senior Consultant
    Mobile: +32 474 57 05 69
    Email: ***@***.***
    PwC Enterprise Advisory cvba/scrl
    Firm legal information, click here
    [http://www.pwc.be/en/assets/image/email/banner-pwc.gif]
    This e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed.
    If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected this e-mail,
    please notify the author by replying to this e-mail. If you are not
    the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, copy, print or
    rely on this e-mail.
    PwC may monitor outgoing and incoming e-mails and
    other telecommunications on its e-mail and telecommunications systems.

  • Author
    Replies

Log in to reply.