Re: [rda-agrisemantics-wg][rda-rice-wg] Feedback needed on a poster on semantics for agriculture data - rice

07 Sep 2016

Sophie,
Some ideas after a quick look.
1. I like some of the terms in the Concepts diagram that might be employed
in the Semantic Richness diagram. For example using "medical use" and
"popular belief" as part of Sociologist rather than "God" as you currently
have.
2. The dotted, connecting lines work for me and "Yield" seems to be one of
the central ideas, although you don't connect the Biological concepts to
that idea.
Biologist and Sociologist are the only boxes that don't have a connection
but they might.
3. The Information system image is probably too simple and could be used to
illustrate several levels of info systems and infrastructure.
It might be something like a data level on the bottom, metadata over it,
with a semantic layer above this and mediating metadata and various
services. The top layer is a User Interface.
4. "Taxonemy" should probably be "Taxonomy" in the Biologist box.
Gary Berg-Cross, Ph.D.
***@***.***
​​

http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?GaryBergCross
Member, Ontolog Board of Trustees
Independent Consultant
Potomac, MD
240-426-0770
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 9:52 AM, Sophie Aubin <
***@***.***> wrote: