Skip to main content

Notice

We are in the process of rolling out a soft launch of the RDA website, which includes a new member platform. Existing RDA members PLEASE REACTIVATE YOUR ACCOUNT using this link: https://rda-login.wicketcloud.com/users/confirmation. Visitors may encounter functionality issues with group pages, navigation, missing content, broken links, etc. As you explore the new site, please provide your feedback using the UserSnap tool on the bottom right corner of each page. Thank you for your understanding and support as we work through all issues as quickly as possible. Stay updated about upcoming features and functionalities: https://www.rd-alliance.org/rda-web-platform-upcoming-features-and-functionalities/

#130344

It is correct that implementation would be hard without funding but
changing the title to contain the word conceptual is indeed a downgrade
that directly tells the reader that the outcome is nothing especial nor
usable. Also, even if the project gets funding or implements the concepts
the title would still conceptual.
My suggestion is that the title should formulate the long-term aim. The
content of the case statement can clarify the strategy that can be multiple
stages like conceptual design, implementation, etc.
Have a nice time in Helsinky,
Javad
On Sun, Oct 20, 2019, 08:55 mabablue via InteroperAble Descriptions of
Observable Property Terminology WG (I-ADOPT WG)
wrote: