Skip to main content

Notice

We are in the process of rolling out a soft launch of the RDA website, which includes a new member platform. Existing RDA members PLEASE REACTIVATE YOUR ACCOUNT using this link: https://rda-login.wicketcloud.com/users/confirmation. Visitors may encounter functionality issues with group pages, navigation, missing content, broken links, etc. As you explore the new site, please provide your feedback using the UserSnap tool on the bottom right corner of each page. Thank you for your understanding and support as we work through all issues as quickly as possible. Stay updated about upcoming features and functionalities: https://www.rd-alliance.org/rda-web-platform-upcoming-features-and-functionalities/

#130719

Dear Sara and others,
This is very good to know and will be very useful for us!
I was planning to update the social sciences overview in the summer and create a new version of the report and I will definitely make sure I use this classification then.
Best wishes,
Ricarda
________________________________
From: s.garavelli=***@***.***-groups.org on behalf of saragaravelli
Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2019 9:42 AM
To: Francoise Genova; ***@***.***-groups.org
Cc: s pittonet; Andrea M Schillaci
Subject: [rda-eu-ambassadors] Re: [rda-eu-ambassadors] Re: [rda-eu-ambassadors] Google sheet with classification of…
Dear all,
With regards to the classification topic be aware that there are ongoing developments at global level. A couple of months ago the RDA EU project has set up a “web-focus” group to discuss with RDA global how to improve the organisation of information on the RDA website. One of the discussion was related to how easily tag and present information of WGs/IGs.
The group has agreed to map the RDA WG/IG according to:
* Scientific domain. General consensus is reached to adopt the “Fields of R&D classification” as indicated in the Frascati Manual 2015 to map the RDA Groups and Outputs
* Group focus. The WFG agreed that the second category will be “Group focus” (and not technological focus) and the following terms will be applied (this mapping is based on the effort done so far within the SUAVE mapping https://suave-dev.sdsc.edu/main/file=zaslavsk_RDA_Groups__June_2018.csv&…):
* Data discovery
* Data access and interoperability
* Improving usefulness of data
* Preservation and stewardship
* Provenance, reuse, and interconnection
* Issues of scale
* Data sharing culture
* Education and training
* Governing and maintaining infrastructure
* Data security, legal interoperability, and compliance
The above mapping will be implemented on all the existing groups by the end of February. For the new groups the above information will have to be mandatorily completed when the group is created.
Please keep this into account as it might facilitate your mapping work
If you need extra information on the mapping please contact my colleagues Sara Pittonet and Andrea Schillaci in CC
Have a lovely weekend
Sara
Il 15/02/19 13:38, Francoise Genova ha scritto:
Dear all,
This is really interesting. One issue will be to take the new Groups into account since the list is constantly evolving.
Best
Francoise
Le 15/02/2019 à 13:21, rvhorik a écrit :
Hi Shaun,
Both Ricarda and I have filled in the classification based on our own (subjective) perception. And this has of course some draw-backs.
A next step could be to motivate (and adjust) each classification by looking more in detail to the activities in the WGs and IGs and analysing the output.
Best,
René
On 15 Feb 2019, at 13:07, sdewitt wrote:
Thanks for sharing that Rene. Can I ask whether you filled in the level of community interest based on your own experience in these fields or whether you approached others (or both). Maybe it would be a good idea for each of the ambassadors to look at this and extend it with their own experience in their field. It would be a great way to learn a little about all the WGs and IGs in RDA if nothing else
Shaun
On Wed, 13 Feb 2019 at 13:28, rvhorik wrote:
Dear all,
As discussed at our call today please find enclosed a link to a Google sheet with RDA output (WG / IG / Outcomes) and classification of relevance for “social science” and “(digital) humanities”.
See: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1kCzdgMmGHT-gJrKSLKA5vU2alcQzDwO4
The sheet can be extended with other disciplines. Please inform me if you want editing rights.
In case there is a Google drive for our group, I could put it there. I do not have a link to this drive.
I am also interested to get the slides of the meeting today.
Best regards,
René
Dr. René van Horik
Program manager
+31 (0) 6 23 29 73 89
***@***.***
DANS: Netherlands Institute for Permanent Access to Digital Research Resources
Anna van Saksenlaan 51 | 2593 HW The Hague | P.O. Box 93067 | 2509 AB The Hague | +31 70 349 44 50 | ***@***.*** | dans.knaw.nl DANS is an institute of the Dutch Academy KNAW and funding organisation NWO.

Full post: https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/rda-europe-ambassadors/post/google-she
Manage my subscriptions: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist
Stop emails for this post: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/62081

If my answers frighten you,
then you should cease asking scary questions.

Full post: https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/rda-europe-ambassadors/post/google-she
Manage my subscriptions: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist
Stop emails for this post: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/62081

Full post: https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/rda-europe-ambassadors/post/re-rda-eu-
Manage my subscriptions: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist
Stop emails for this post: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/62134

Full post: https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/rda-europe-ambassadors/post/re-rda-eu-
Manage my subscriptions: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist
Stop emails for this post: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/62134