Skip to main content

Notice

We are in the process of rolling out a soft launch of the RDA website, which includes a new member platform. Existing RDA members PLEASE REACTIVATE YOUR ACCOUNT using this link: https://rda-login.wicketcloud.com/users/confirmation. Visitors may encounter functionality issues with group pages, navigation, missing content, broken links, etc. As you explore the new site, please provide your feedback using the UserSnap tool on the bottom right corner of each page. Thank you for your understanding and support as we work through all issues as quickly as possible. Stay updated about upcoming features and functionalities: https://www.rd-alliance.org/rda-web-platform-upcoming-features-and-functionalities/

#130332

Dear Yann, all,
I hope the FAIRsFAIR pre-meeting was productive.
Indeed FAIR semantics certainly goes beyond just describing semantic resources with right metadata. As I mentioned, as ontology repository provider, we do ask ourselves all the questions. Because we are building « data repositories » as others… our data are just ontologies.
We are totally open to collaborate on this and willing to participate if there will be action/meeting etc.
If a WG (as RDA defines it with recommandations, timing, deliverables, etc.) is proposed, then we will of course join and participate and then certainly merge our TG (as VSSIG defines it without the requirement of a WG) with it.
But if you’re talking about another TG, then I don’t think it’s necessary to have two and we can discuss rebrand the « ontology metadata » TG to something larger to match « FAIR semantics ».
Biswanath will give a short report Friday. And we can discuss more then.
Bye
Clement
PS: very good to know for your assignment at CINES on EOSC-Pillar. Let’s meet again in Montpellier then… will continue off list !