Skip to main content


We are in the process of rolling out a soft launch of the RDA website, which includes a new member platform. Existing RDA members PLEASE REACTIVATE YOUR ACCOUNT using this link: Visitors may encounter functionality issues with group pages, navigation, missing content, broken links, etc. As you explore the new site, please provide your feedback using the UserSnap tool on the bottom right corner of each page. Thank you for your understanding and support as we work through all issues as quickly as possible. Stay updated about upcoming features and functionalities:


Rolf Krahl

Dear all,
I’m delighted by the many feedbacks and discussions on the draft
metadata schema in the Google doc. Now P12 is approaching fast and I
need to prepare the slides for the presentation of the first draft of
the schema in our WG session. Unfortunatly, I need to make a cut now,
not to stop the discussion, but in order to have some well defined
state to base the presentation on.
So I moved what I percieved as the current state of the discussion
back to our GitHub repository, here:
See the schema.rst in that repository. I took the opportunity to
tighten and to rephrase some formulations and also to review the
presentation, but I tried not to introduce any changes to the content.
Due to lack of time, I didn’t capture the explanatory text. This
certainly still needs to be added (after P12).
Of course, the draft schema is just that, a draft. It is still
subject to discussions and modifications. In order to formalize the
further procedure a little bit and make it easier to track changes, I
suggest that new proposals for substantial modifications should be
submitted as an issue to GitHub from now on. This would allow us to
focus the discussion on this proposed change on this issue’s page.
Best regards,

Rolf Krahl
Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie (HZB)
Albert-Einstein-Str. 15, 12489 Berlin
Tel.: +49 30 8062 12122