Skip to main content


We are in the process of rolling out a soft launch of the RDA website, which includes a new member platform. Existing RDA members PLEASE REACTIVATE YOUR ACCOUNT using this link: Visitors may encounter functionality issues with group pages, navigation, missing content, broken links, etc. As you explore the new site, please provide your feedback using the UserSnap tool on the bottom right corner of each page. Thank you for your understanding and support as we work through all issues as quickly as possible. Stay updated about upcoming features and functionalities:


Dear all,
sorry I missed the last meeting, I was on a writing retreat.
Cosmetics: We start the charter with (abbreviation) and later in the text switch to (full name). Why is that so? I consider the second version as uncommon.
Should we aim for active participants/group chairs from the Global South before we proceed?
Where can I read up on the subgroups’ topics? In particular, how do they meet our objectives?
There seems to be a focus on openness in the charter. That’s nice. But isn’t that (one) part of FAIR principles? In particular, I’d consider openness one implementation strategy for FAIR principles, once we have the principles in place.
In FAIR4RS there was a subgroup dealing with definition work. I suggest to also have such a subgroup to match our objectives.
Sorry if I missed to read anything other than the etherpad and presentation.