Skip to main content


We are in the process of rolling out a soft launch of the RDA website, which includes a new member platform. Existing RDA members PLEASE REACTIVATE YOUR ACCOUNT using this link: Visitors may encounter functionality issues with group pages, navigation, missing content, broken links, etc. As you explore the new site, please provide your feedback using the UserSnap tool on the bottom right corner of each page. Thank you for your understanding and support as we work through all issues as quickly as possible. Stay updated about upcoming features and functionalities:


Thank you, Hilary, all. Great job!
With point 2:
/> //_*2. Specific RDA group contributions*_//: have NOT been included
in this release //
/> BUT the groups in question have been referenced in the document. //
/> We can discuss this for the next releases./
do you refer to the FAIRsharing WG contribution? I ask as I cannot find
the link to the doc, and I would like to send the info to the WG list. I
guess it is hard to find, maybe because there are many references (from
the Omics and Clinical sections) to records of standards and
repositories records in FAIRsharing.
However, section 3.2.2 (Standards) and 3.2.4 (Repositories) only
recommends the Metadata Standards Directory, and re3data, respectively.
Should FAIRsharing also be mentioned, especially since the many links to
the records from the other subgroups? Like you say, perhaps the new
structure will address this.
Kind regards,