Re: [SPAM] Re: [rda-agrisemantics-wg] Resource/data life cycle

15 Dec 2016
Groups audience: 

Erick, Simon,
Thank you very much! The question and the answer were very useful also to us!
At Embrapa, were are engaged to implement a data, information and knowledge governance model, where data management is one of the starting points... We separate the concept of "governance" from the concept of "management", but we try to maintain the whole (and ontological) conceptual route that interrelates them. Good (sub-)models for the units of this complex system are always welcome!
Best regards.
Ivo Pierozzi Jr.
Organização do Conhecimento & Terminologia Agropecuária
Kno wledge Organization & Agricultural Terminology
Embrapa Informática Agropecuária, Campinas, SP, Brazil
Embrapa Agricultural Informatics
***@***.*** / Tel.: +55 19 32115867 / S kype: ivo.pierozzi.jr
www.embrapa.br/informatica-agropecuaria
----- Mensagem original -----
De: "simon.cox" <***@***.***>
Para: "erick antezana" <***@***.***>, ***@***.***-groups.org
Enviadas: Quarta-feira, 14 de dezembro de 2016 21:59:56
Assunto: [SPAM] Re: [rda-agrisemantics-wg] Resource/data life cycle
This from ISO 19135 “Procedures for item registration”
This variation from the UK Linked Data community
http://purl.org/linked-data/registry#Status also see
https://github.com/UKGovLD/registry-core/wiki/Life-cycle-customization
Also see ISO 11179-6:2015 §4.4
With lifecycle as shown in Annex D at Figure D.1
- Show quoted text -From: erick.antezana=***@***.***-groups.org [mailto:***@***.***-groups.org] On Behalf Of erick.antezana
Sent: Thursday, 15 December, 2016 07:55
To: ***@***.***-groups.org
Subject: [rda-agrisemantics-wg] Resource/data life cycle
Hello,
I was wondering whether within any of the RDA initiatives there is any guideline / document / or whatsoever on the data/resources life cycle? By life cycle I mean the stages an piece of data (e.g. a concept/class/instance in an ontology) could undergo such:
- under review,
- active (reviewed),
- obsolete (inactive?),
- ...
Any pointer would be highly appreciated.
cheers,
Erick Antezana
____________________________________________________________________________
Aviso de confidencialidade
Esta mensagem da Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuaria (Embrapa),
empresa publica federal regida pelo disposto na Lei Federal no. 5.851, de
7 de dezembro de 1972, e enviada exclusivamente a seu destinatario e pode
conter informacoes confidenciais, protegidas por sigilo profissional. Sua
utilizacao desautorizada e ilegal e sujeita o infrator as penas da lei. Se
voce a recebeu indevidamente, queira, por gentileza, reenvia-la ao emitente,
esclarecendo o equivoco.
Confidentiality note
This message from Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuaria (Embrapa), a
government company established under Brazilian law (5.851/72), is directed
exclusively to its addressee and may contain confidential data, protected
under professional secrecy rules. Its unauthorized use is illegal and may
subject the transgressor to the law's penalties. If you are not the addressee,
please send it back, elucidating the failure.

File Attachment: 
AttachmentSize
Image icon image001.png5.81 KB
Image icon image002.png136.55 KB
Image icon image003.png99.81 KB
  • Erick Antezana's picture

    Author: Erick Antezana

    Date: 20 Dec, 2016

    Dear all,
    Thanks for the information. I am reviewing all these material as well as
    other I go it from other sources.
    My interest resides on the tagging of data entities using a (standard)
    terminology, e.g. obsolete.
    I will share with you my findings as soon as I get something consistent. In
    any case, if you guys know about other initiatives, please let me know.
    regards,
    Erick
    On 15 December 2016 at 11:00, Ivo Pierozzi Junior <***@***.***>
    wrote:

submit a comment