Phase 1 of the second round of reviews

Hi Paul
When going yesterday through the sent documents for today telecom, I saw that you had sent de reviews plus (your) answering comments.
But unless I am wrong, although you make constant references to …have been incorporated; … has been reinforced; … comments of reviewer D are in the text… etc., you did not send the text itself of the Principles and Guidelines with all these modifications and comments… or did you?
Or, alternatively, are they in a new version in google docs which I have missed?
Take care
Enrique
De: pfuhlir=***@***.***-groups.org [mailto:***@***.***-groups.org] En nombre de puhlir
Enviado el: lunes, 06 de junio de 2016 17:22
Para: RDA/CODATA Legal Interoperability IG
Asunto: [rda-legalinterop-ig] Phase 1 of the second round of reviews
Hi all:
We have received another 6 reviews from different sectors and from 2 in the US, 2 in the UK, 1 in the NL, and 1 from AU. I think we have a very good cross-section of perspectives, including additions of 3 lawyers, a Creative Commons executive, a science funding agency rep, and another publisher.
Attached for our discussion this Friday at the regular time are all the summary comments we received and DRAFT responses. The summary reviews and responses are 33 pages, so we will break up the discussion of the reviews into the summary and then the specific comments and actual changes to the Principles and Implementation Guidelines. I believe that the summary comments will take two phone calls to complete, and we can then discuss the more specific comments and actual changes to the documents. This is the same process we followed in the first set of reviews.
The changes to the documents themselves will not be changed as extensively as the first time, but there are more comments than before because we have 19 reviewers. Please read the attached summary and the instructions at the top of the document, and be prepared to discuss the responses (but only the ones you have questions about or disagree with).
Thanks!
Paul
________________________________
El texto de este correo es confidencial y exclusivamente está dirigido a su destinatario. Si se ha enviado a una dirección errónea rogamos elimine el mismo y, en su caso, los documentos adjuntos, y nos lo comunique urgentemente. This message is intented only for the use of the addresse and contain confidential information. If you are not the intented recipient, dissemination of this documentation is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please, erase all copies of the message and its attachments and notify us immediately.
Antes de imprimir este correo electrónico, piense bien si es necesario hacerlo: El medioambiente es cosa de todos.

Sorry for the confusion, Enrique. No, I did not yet send out the revised
Principles and Implantation Guidelines, so please refer to the reviews
copies dated 21 April that were sent to the reviewers.
This first phase will only look at the summary review comments and my draft
responses, which have not yet been incorporated. They have been drafted in
the past tense that indicates that they have been, but this is just a
"placeholder". The whole group should see these comments and draft
responses first in order to agree-disagree-discuss them *before* the docs
are revised because the comments are so voluminous. Some reviews are
straightforward and some have issues that require discussion.
Please read the explanation at the beginning of the Summary Review
compilation that explains this process. We will discuss that document first
before the actual documents are revised and sent to everyone.
I look forward to beginning the discussions again today.
Cheers,
- Show quoted text -On Jun 10, 2016 6:15 AM, "enriquealonso" <***@***.***-estado.es>
wrote:
Hi Paul
When going yesterday through the sent documents for today telecom, I saw
that you had sent de reviews plus (your) answering comments.
But unless I am wrong, although you make constant references to …have been
incorporated; … has been reinforced; … comments of reviewer D are in the
text… etc., you did not send the text itself of the Principles and
Guidelines with all these modifications and comments… or did you?
Or, alternatively, are they in a new version in google docs which I have
missed?
Take care
Enrique
*De:* pfuhlir=***@***.***-groups.org [mailto:pfuhlir=
***@***.***-groups.org] *En nombre de *puhlir
*Enviado el:* lunes, 06 de junio de 2016 17:22
*Para:* RDA/CODATA Legal Interoperability IG
*Asunto:* [rda-legalinterop-ig] Phase 1 of the second round of reviews
Hi all:
We have received another 6 reviews from different sectors and from 2 in the
US, 2 in the UK, 1 in the NL, and 1 from AU. I think we have a very good
cross-section of perspectives, including additions of 3 lawyers, a Creative
Commons executive, a science funding agency rep, and another publisher.
Attached for our discussion this Friday at the regular time are all the
summary comments we received and DRAFT responses. The summary reviews and
responses are 33 pages, so we will break up the discussion of the reviews
into the summary and then the specific comments and actual changes to the
Principles and Implementation Guidelines. I believe that the summary
comments will take two phone calls to complete, and we can then discuss the
more specific comments and actual changes to the documents. This is the
same process we followed in the first set of reviews.
The changes to the documents themselves will not be changed as extensively
as the first time, but there are more comments than before because we have
19 reviewers. Please read the attached summary and the instructions at the
top of the document, and be prepared to discuss the responses (but only the
ones you have questions about or disagree with).
Thanks!
Paul
------------------------------
El texto de este correo es confidencial y exclusivamente está dirigido a su
destinatario. Si se ha enviado a una dirección errónea rogamos elimine el
mismo y, en su caso, los documentos adjuntos, y nos lo comunique
urgentemente. This message is intented only for the use of the addresse and
contain confidential information. If you are not the intented recipient,
dissemination of this documentation is prohibited. If you have received
this communication in error, please, erase all copies of the message and
its attachments and notify us immediately.
Antes de imprimir este correo electrónico, piense bien si es necesario
hacerlo: El medioambiente es cosa de todos.
--
Full post:
https://rd-alliance.org/group/rdacodata-legal-interoperability-ig/post/p...
Manage my subscriptions: https://rd-alliance.org/mailinglist
Stop emails for this post:
https://rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/52808

OK. It coincides with what I/we all have. I just was wondering if I had missed something and a confirmation that the statu quo is precisely what you say in the email you just sent .. but there was no confusion but need to get rassured.. Very clear.
Take care
De: Paul Uhlir [mailto:***@***.***]
Enviado el: viernes, 10 de junio de 2016 12:36
Para: Enrique Alonso García
CC: RDA/CODATA Legal Interoperability IG
Asunto: Re: [rda-legalinterop-ig] Phase 1 of the second round of reviews
Sorry for the confusion, Enrique. No, I did not yet send out the revised Principles and Implantation Guidelines, so please refer to the reviews copies dated 21 April that were sent to the reviewers.
This first phase will only look at the summary review comments and my draft responses, which have not yet been incorporated. They have been drafted in the past tense that indicates that they have been, but this is just a "placeholder". The whole group should see these comments and draft responses first in order to agree-disagree-discuss them *before* the docs are revised because the comments are so voluminous. Some reviews are straightforward and some have issues that require discussion.
Please read the explanation at the beginning of the Summary Review compilation that explains this process. We will discuss that document first before the actual documents are revised and sent to everyone.
I look forward to beginning the discussions again today.
Cheers,
- Show quoted text -On Jun 10, 2016 6:15 AM, "enriquealonso" <***@***.***-estado.es> wrote:
Hi Paul
When going yesterday through the sent documents for today telecom, I saw that you had sent de reviews plus (your) answering comments.
But unless I am wrong, although you make constant references to …have been incorporated; … has been reinforced; … comments of reviewer D are in the text… etc., you did not send the text itself of the Principles and Guidelines with all these modifications and comments… or did you?
Or, alternatively, are they in a new version in google docs which I have missed?
Take care
Enrique
De: pfuhlir=***@***.***-groups.org [mailto:pfuhlir=***@***.***-groups.org] En nombre de puhlir
Enviado el: lunes, 06 de junio de 2016 17:22
Para: RDA/CODATA Legal Interoperability IG
Asunto: [rda-legalinterop-ig] Phase 1 of the second round of reviews
Hi all:
We have received another 6 reviews from different sectors and from 2 in the US, 2 in the UK, 1 in the NL, and 1 from AU. I think we have a very good cross-section of perspectives, including additions of 3 lawyers, a Creative Commons executive, a science funding agency rep, and another publisher.
Attached for our discussion this Friday at the regular time are all the summary comments we received and DRAFT responses. The summary reviews and responses are 33 pages, so we will break up the discussion of the reviews into the summary and then the specific comments and actual changes to the Principles and Implementation Guidelines. I believe that the summary comments will take two phone calls to complete, and we can then discuss the more specific comments and actual changes to the documents. This is the same process we followed in the first set of reviews.
The changes to the documents themselves will not be changed as extensively as the first time, but there are more comments than before because we have 19 reviewers. Please read the attached summary and the instructions at the top of the document, and be prepared to discuss the responses (but only the ones you have questions about or disagree with).
Thanks!
Paul
________________________________
El texto de este correo es confidencial y exclusivamente está dirigido a su destinatario. Si se ha enviado a una dirección errónea rogamos elimine el mismo y, en su caso, los documentos adjuntos, y nos lo comunique urgentemente. This message is intented only for the use of the addresse and contain confidential information. If you are not the intented recipient, dissemination of this documentation is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please, erase all copies of the message and its attachments and notify us immediately.
Antes de imprimir este correo electrónico, piense bien si es necesario hacerlo: El medioambiente es cosa de todos.
--
Full post: https://rd-alliance.org/group/rdacodata-legal-interoperability-ig/post/p...
Manage my subscriptions: https://rd-alliance.org/mailinglist
Stop emails for this post: https://rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/52808
________________________________
El texto de este correo es confidencial y exclusivamente está dirigido a su destinatario. Si se ha enviado a una dirección errónea rogamos elimine el mismo y, en su caso, los documentos adjuntos, y nos lo comunique urgentemente. This message is intented only for the use of the addresse and contain confidential information. If you are not the intented recipient, dissemination of this documentation is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please, erase all copies of the message and its attachments and notify us immediately.
Antes de imprimir este correo electrónico, piense bien si es necesario hacerlo: El medioambiente es cosa de todos.