Becoming a member of RDA is simple and open to both individuals and organizations
Discover what RDA Working and Interest Groups and all other Groups are up to and find out how to join them. Explore Groups
With over 10000 members from 145 countries, RDA provides a neutral space where its members can come together to develop and adopt infrastructure that promotes data-sharing and data-driven research
The Research Data Alliance accomplishes its mission primarily through Working and Interest Groups. Discover all of them and learn how to join.
RDA Outputs are the technical and social infrastructure solutions that enable data sharing, exchange and interoperability
This whiteboard is open to all RDA discipline specialists willing to give a personal account of what data-related challenges they are facing and how RDA is helping them
I would propose to make as much use as possible of the work done within W3C groups and their standards.
Author: Simon Cox
Date: 12 Mar, 2015
Have no fear Herbert - the group is packed with folk with experience of W3C standards like SKOS, RDFS and OWL, the application of Linked Data principles, and a commitment to application of existing standards in preference to re-invention.
Author: Arthur Smith
Date: 24 Apr, 2015
I'm very interested in this group - I didn't seem to be able to add that comment on the charter proposal page so I'm making a note here. Does anybody have an idea what the timeline is from here? It's been about 6 weeks of "community review" - will that continue much longer? Then there's the technical advisory board review? Can we do some things while we're waiting for the reviews? It looked like there is a wiki that can be set up, and some other configuration stuff... just wondering how we can get things moving a bit more here...
Arthur
Author: Kathleen Fontaine
Date: 27 Apr, 2015
Hi Arthur -
The process is that, ideally, Community Review lasts about 30 days; then there is a short period of time for addressing comments; then a two week TAB review; then some time for addressing comments; then Council review.
Depending upon the extent of comments and availability of editors to make the changes, the whole thing can take 3 months or so. In the meantime, comments and discussions should be able to happen on your group page.
Does this help?
Thanks
K
_______________________________________
Dr. Kathleen S. Fontaine (Kathy)
Managing Director
Research Data Alliance/US
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Amos Eaton, Room 211
110 8th Street
Troy, NY 12080
P - 518.276.2829
C - 410.991.6728
e - ***@***.***
Skype - ksfontaine
From: apsmith <***@***.***>
Date: Friday, April 24, 2015 at 3:00 PM
To: Vocabulary Services Interest Group <***@***.***-groups.org>
Subject: Re: [vocabulary_services] W3C standards for Vocabularies
I'm very interested in this group - I didn't seem to be able to add that comment on the charter proposal page so I'm making a note here. Does anybody have an idea what the timeline is from here? It's been about 6 weeks of "community review" - will that continue much longer? Then there's the technical advisory board review? Can we do some things while we're waiting for the reviews? It looked like there is a wiki that can be set up, and some other configuration stuff... just wondering how we can get things moving a bit more here...
Arthur
--
Full post: https://rd-alliance.org/group/vocabulary-services-interest-group/post/w3...
Manage my subscriptions: https://rd-alliance.org/mailinglist
Stop emails for this post: https://rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/47835