PID for research metadata presentation (draft)

03 Jun 2022

Hello,
As discussed previously, I'm showing you this presentation I'm
going to give in 2 weeks. It's a first draft, and I will welcome
all your recommandations.
Maybe it lacks some illustrations, I'll be glad to read your
feedbacks.
Cheers,
--
Jonathan (ノ°益°)ノ 彡 [ɹǝɟɟǝɐɥɔS]
Observatoire des Sciences de l'Univers de Grenoble
Responsable technique Résif-DC
✉ Isterre, bureau 035, 1381 rue de la Piscine 38610 GIERES
✆ +33 4 76 63 51 37

  • Markus Stocker's picture

    Author: Markus Stocker

    Date: 04 Jun, 2022

    Hi Jonathan,
    overall looks good to me, few comment on this statement: "There is a
    mapping with DataCite schema (to assign a DOI to your instrument) and
    ePIC This way, an instrument can be assigned with a DOI or a Handle."
    * ePIC and DataCite are two *implementations* of PIDINST schema,
    DataCite requires a schema mapping and ePIC is a full PIDINST schema
    implementation
    * DataCite DOIs are Handles, too, and I believe ePIC IDs can be
    resolved via https://doi.org.
    Cheers, m.
    On Fri, Jun 3, 2022 at 4:26 PM Jonathan Schaeffer via Persistent
    Identification of Instruments WG
    <***@***.***-groups.org>

submit a comment