As discussed previously, I'm showing you this presentation I'm
going to give in 2 weeks. It's a first draft, and I will welcome
all your recommandations.
Maybe it lacks some illustrations, I'll be glad to read your
Jonathan (ﾉ°益°)ﾉ 彡 [ɹǝɟɟǝɐɥɔS]
Observatoire des Sciences de l'Univers de Grenoble
Responsable technique Résif-DC
✉ Isterre, bureau 035, 1381 rue de la Piscine 38610 GIERES
✆ +33 4 76 63 51 37
PID for research metadata presentation (draft)
You are here
Author: Markus Stocker
Date: 04 Jun, 2022
overall looks good to me, few comment on this statement: "There is a
mapping with DataCite schema (to assign a DOI to your instrument) and
ePIC This way, an instrument can be assigned with a DOI or a Handle."
* ePIC and DataCite are two *implementations* of PIDINST schema,
DataCite requires a schema mapping and ePIC is a full PIDINST schema
* DataCite DOIs are Handles, too, and I believe ePIC IDs can be
resolved via https://doi.org.
On Fri, Jun 3, 2022 at 4:26 PM Jonathan Schaeffer via Persistent
Identification of Instruments WG