02
Apr
2021
Groups audience:
Just to add to this, ESIP decided not to recommend “resourceType” be used in the human readable citation text despite recommendations from DataCite because, as noted earlier, what a thing is is highly dependent on context. It’s more important that the resource type be specified more precisely in a machine readable way when the citation is resolved.
See ESIP Data Preservation and Stewardship Committee. 2019. Data Citation Guidelines for Earth Science Data, Version 2. Earth Science Information Partners. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.8441816.v1
cheers,
-m.
Mark A. Parsons
Research Scientist
University of Alabama in Huntsville
+1 303 941 9986
Mail: 1550 Linden Ave, Boulder, CO 80304, USA
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7723-0950
Author: Robert Huber
Date: 04 Apr, 2021
Thank you Marc,
this is indeed a very useful resource, I wished this WG would have produced
something like that for 'standard data citation' in addition to the
dynamic data citation case.
What do you think, is there a chance to revitalize the WG and to do this in
the near future?
happy Eastern!
Robert
On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 4:50 PM Mark Parsons via Data Citation WG <
***@***.***-groups.org> wrote: