Hi again,
Markus just told me that Interoperability Framework is no longer reserved for KOINE as this seems no more the target of upcoming calls…
So we could use:
1. conceptual framework for interoperable observable property terminology
2. Conceptual Interoperability Framework (CIP) for observable property terminology
3. Reference Model for an Interoperability Framework for observable property terminology
So I definitively prefer 2: Conceptual Interoperability Framework for observable property terminology.
Any preferences are welcome!
Sorry for this avalanche of emails on a Sunday… I extended the deadline to tomorrow morning 10:00 (CEST), then I have definetively to return the refined case statement to the TAB.
The updated case statement can be found in this folder:
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1XwAqLQFUDXwlW3_6OCiTOKnQkAq3Bxbt
Cheers,
Barbara
Gesendet von Mail für Windows 10
Von: Magagna Barbara
Gesendet: Sonntag, 20. Oktober 2019 08:55
An: ***@***.***-groups.org
Betreff: Updates regarding Case Statement and Work Plan
Wichtigkeit: Hoch
Hi all,
there are two issues that I want to highlight.
1. There was a main concern expressed by Michael Diepenbroek. He thinks we won‘t be able to develop an interoperability framework without fundings.
Well I must admit that this term is not well defined and could be interpreted differently. What is meant here is a conceptual framework, not a technical implementation. Also Interoperability Framework is a term used in the KOINE proposal, which might be resubmitted and we don’t want to use this outside that consortium. So I would suggest to use instead: conceptual framework for interoperable observable property terminology. I hope you can agree. If you have strong arguments against this term please write back to me with a better suggestion to be used in the case statement preferrably before midnight (CEST) this eveining, but at latest by tomorrow 10:00.
2. I am revising the work plan and templates for collecting user stories and semantic representations till Thursday 24 Oct, please check this document, if you want to contribute and review: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qRU891S9-nXMzJiPWFsucIwNDDIq6oAG35PF...
Thanks!!
Best regards,
Barbara
Gesendet von Mail für Windows 10
Author: Robert Huber
Date: 20 Oct, 2019
Hi Barbara,
maybe ‚interoperability framework concept‘ is what we could achieve within
a RDA working group?
best regards,
Robert
On Sunday, October 20, 2019, mabablue via InteroperAble Descriptions of
Observable Property Terminology WG (I-ADOPT WG) <***@***.***-groups.org>
wrote:
--
Dr. Robert Huber,
PANGAEA - www.pangaea.de
_____________________________________________
MARUM - Center for Marine Environmental Sciences
University Bremen
Leobener Strasse
POB 330 440
28359 Bremen
Phone ++49 421 218-65593, Fax ++49 421 218-65505
e-mail ***@***.***-bremen.de
Author: LUCIA MONA
Date: 21 Oct, 2019
Dear Barbara
I also prefer the option 2.
Ciao
Lucia
Dr. Lucia Mona
CNR-IMAA
C.da S. Loja
I- 85050 Tito Scalo (PZ)
Italy
Phone: +39 0971427257
Fax: +39 0971427271
Il 20/10/2019 10:43, mabablue via InteroperAble Descriptions of