Next Call March 6, 9 am UTC

Dear all,
I tried to implement the decisions from today's meeting:
- #1: submitted pull request #18 to add a license.
- #4: closed the issue.
- #5: submitted pull request #19 to amend AlternateIdentifier.
- #6: pull request #12 to add modelName was already submitted earlier.
- #9: closed the pull request.
- #15: closed the issue.
- #17: add a comment, trying to summarize today's discussion.
For the pull requests, I leave it to you to hit the merge button after
proof reading.
Please note that #12 and #19 will conflict with each other due to the
table formatting. I'll be happy to resolve the conflict in the second
one after the first of the two gets merged.
Best regards,
Rolf
--
Rolf Krahl <***@***.***-berlin.de>
Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie (HZB)
Albert-Einstein-Str. 15, 12489 Berlin
Tel.: +49 30 8062 12122

Thanks, Rolf, for implementing the decisions we made in the call.
There are still some open issues against which some of you are tagged.
Please inform us if the recent changes address your concerns. Thanks,
all.
Cheers, m.
On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 2:11 PM rolf.krahl

Dear Rolf and Markus,
sorry that I could not attend the meeting yesterday due to a collision.
Most of my concerns are addressed with the current solution.
But the discussion went a bit into a wrong direction due to
misunderstanding probably caused by my lack of precision here.
I was not talking about a serial number, which is usually an identifier
used by manufacturers inside a series. I was talking about the
identification of the series itself. This might be part of the string
for model name. But for identification purposes it would be better from
my point of view, to have an optional subfield ''seriesName' of modelName.
BTW. refering to the discussion about uniqueness of serial numbers: very
often model name, series and serial number disambiguates this, but there
is of course no guarantee.

Dear all,
For some issues, we decided in the meeting to leave them open for now.
I left #5 open to give Lou an opportunity to comment whether the
result in AlternateIdentifier addresses her concern and if she is
happy to close. And then there are a few new ones.
But I believe, none of the currently open issues is a show stopper to
present the second draft schema at P13 based on what we have now and
urgently needs to be acted upon before the plenary.
Best regards,
Rolf
--
Rolf Krahl <***@***.***-berlin.de>
Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie (HZB)
Albert-Einstein-Str. 15, 12489 Berlin
Tel.: +49 30 8062 12122