RDA DMP Common standards - February 2019 Call

13 Feb 2019
Groups audience: 

Dear group members,

Since our last call in January, we have introduced some changes in the model. The last call was very fruitful and we would like to organise another one next week.
Please indicate your availability:

https://doodle.com/poll/2mpt3hdchcu58a7k

Current version of the model can be found here:
https://www.lucidchart.com/invitations/accept/ee26bc71-01a6-442a-b946-5b...

When looking at the model you may want to ask yourselves: does the set of fields would fulfil requirements of my funder/institution/template?
During the call we would like to hear your opinion on that, discuss points listed below and address any comments you may have.

The model is likely to evolve within the next few days. We have some outstanding to-dos and would appreciate your feedback:
1. Identifiers and their consistent use (do we provide a full HTTP link for DOI, or only a number, etc.)
2. DMP State - do we need to indicate state of a DMP as a global flag: draft, submitted, etc. Is this universally understandable?
3. DM Roles - dictionary?
4. Cost types - dictionary?
5. Cost units - dictionary?
6. Dataset types - dictionary?
7. Technical resources - dictionary?
8. Host and quality of service fields? What is missing?

We look forward to hearing from you!

Best wishes,

Tomasz Miksa

  • Tomasz Miksa's picture

    Author: Tomasz Miksa

    Date: 17 Feb, 2019

    Dear group members,

    The winning slot for our next call is Tuesday, 19.02, 17 CET.

    Connection details will follow!

    Best wishes,

    Tomasz Miksa

    From: tmiksa=sba-research.org@rda-groups.org [mailto:tmiksa=sba-research.org@rda-groups.org] On Behalf Of tmiksa
    Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2019 5:39 PM
    To: DMP Common Standards WG
    Subject: [dmp-common] RDA DMP Common standards - February 2019 Call

    Dear group members,

    Since our last call in January, we have introduced some changes in the model. The last call was very fruitful and we would like to organise another one next week.
    Please indicate your availability:

    https://doodle.com/poll/2mpt3hdchcu58a7k

    Current version of the model can be found here:
    https://www.lucidchart.com/invitations/accept/ee26bc71-01a6-442a-b946-5b...

    When looking at the model you may want to ask yourselves: does the set of fields would fulfil requirements of my funder/institution/template?
    During the call we would like to hear your opinion on that, discuss points listed below and address any comments you may have.

    The model is likely to evolve within the next few days. We have some outstanding to-dos and would appreciate your feedback:
    1. Identifiers and their consistent use (do we provide a full HTTP link for DOI, or only a number, etc.)
    2. DMP State - do we need to indicate state of a DMP as a global flag: draft, submitted, etc. Is this universally understandable?
    3. DM Roles - dictionary?
    4. Cost types - dictionary?
    5. Cost units - dictionary?
    6. Dataset types - dictionary?
    7. Technical resources - dictionary?
    8. Host and quality of service fields? What is missing?

    We look forward to hearing from you!

    Best wishes,

    Tomasz Miksa

  • Paul Walk's picture

    Author: Paul Walk

    Date: 18 Feb, 2019

    All,
    The connection URL for the RDA DMP Common standards call tomorrow (2019-02-19 17:00 CET) is:

    https://zoom.us/j/416673627

    Looking forward to the call!

    Paul

    > On 17 Feb 2019, at 23:03, tmiksa wrote:
    >
    > Dear group members,
    >
    > The winning slot for our next call is Tuesday, 19.02, 17 CET.
    >
    > Connection details will follow!
    >
    > Best wishes,
    >
    > Tomasz Miksa
    >
    > From: tmiksa=sba-research.org@rda-groups.org [mailto:tmiksa=sba-research.org@rda-groups.org] On Behalf Of tmiksa
    > Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2019 5:39 PM
    > To: DMP Common Standards WG
    > Subject: [dmp-common] RDA DMP Common standards - February 2019 Call
    >
    > Dear group members,
    >
    > Since our last call in January, we have introduced some changes in the model. The last call was very fruitful and we would like to organise another one next week.
    > Please indicate your availability:
    >
    > https://doodle.com/poll/2mpt3hdchcu58a7k
    >
    > Current version of the model can be found here:
    > https://www.lucidchart.com/invitations/accept/ee26bc71-01a6-442a-b946-5b...
    >
    > When looking at the model you may want to ask yourselves: does the set of fields would fulfil requirements of my funder/institution/template?
    > During the call we would like to hear your opinion on that, discuss points listed below and address any comments you may have.
    >
    > The model is likely to evolve within the next few days. We have some outstanding to-dos and would appreciate your feedback:
    > 1. Identifiers and their consistent use (do we provide a full HTTP link for DOI, or only a number, etc.)
    > 2. DMP State - do we need to indicate state of a DMP as a global flag: draft, submitted, etc. Is this universally understandable?
    > 3. DM Roles - dictionary?
    > 4. Cost types - dictionary?
    > 5. Cost units - dictionary?
    > 6. Dataset types - dictionary?
    > 7. Technical resources - dictionary?
    > 8. Host and quality of service fields? What is missing?
    >
    > We look forward to hearing from you!
    >
    > Best wishes,
    >
    > Tomasz Miksa
    > --
    > Full post: https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/dmp-common-standards-wg/post/rda-dmp-c...
    > Manage my subscriptions: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist
    > Stop emails for this post: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/62103

    -------------------------------------------
    Paul Walk
    http://www.paulwalk.net

    Founder and Director, Antleaf Ltd
    http://www.antleaf.com

    Antleaf provides Management Services to DCMI
    http://www.dublincore.org
    -------------------------------------------

  • Sadia Vancauwenbergh's picture

    Author: Sadia Vancauwenbergh

    Date: 21 Feb, 2019

    Dear Paul,

    My colleague met Peter Neish on the IDCC conference and just pointed me towards this working group. This wg is highly important to us as we are assisting the implementation of RD standards in Flemish Research Information Systems. On the other hand, I'm Ex. Board Member Standards and Classifications with respect to EuroCRIS, the organization on research information systems that creates the CERIF-XML format for exchanging research information in a standardized way. 

    I noticed I just missed a tel call earlier this week, however do you have another one scheduled as I think it's highly relevant that both communities team up efforts.

     

    Kind regards,

    Sadia

  • Tomasz Miksa's picture

    Author: Tomasz Miksa

    Date: 19 Feb, 2019

    Dear all,

    Thank you very much to all those who joined us today.

    The meeting minutes can be found here:
    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1P0VBZxglHCSJE2zXYhOC8H94yzlgBl5dz_sB...

    We are still waiting for your inputs on dictionaries:
    DM Roles - dictionary?
    Cost types - dictionary?
    Cost units - dictionary?
    Dataset types - dictionary?
    Technical resources - dictionary?

    Please also take a look at cardinalities assigned to classes and fields. Do they make sense to you?
    https://www.lucidchart.com/invitations/accept/ee26bc71-01a6-442a-b946-5b...

    Apart from these outstanding tasks, it seems that we have a pretty stable outline of our interchange format for maDMPs.
    In the next weeks we will work on providing examples consisting of:
    - a short use case, e.g. "I will keep me source code on GitHub"
    - a JSON example following our common model

    Best wishes
    Tomasz Miksa

    -----Original Message-----
    From: paul=paulwalk.net@rda-groups.org On Behalf Of paulwalk
    Sent: Monday, February 18, 2019 12:04 PM
    To: DMP Common Standards WG
    Subject: Re: [dmp-common] RDA DMP Common standards - February 2019 Call

    All,
    The connection URL for the RDA DMP Common standards call tomorrow (2019-02-19 17:00 CET) is:

    https://zoom.us/j/416673627

    Looking forward to the call!

    Paul

    > On 17 Feb 2019, at 23:03, tmiksa wrote:
    >
    > Dear group members,
    >
    > The winning slot for our next call is Tuesday, 19.02, 17 CET.
    >
    > Connection details will follow!
    >
    > Best wishes,
    >
    > Tomasz Miksa
    >
    > From: tmiksa=sba-research.org@rda-groups.org
    > [mailto:tmiksa=sba-research.org@rda-groups.org] On Behalf Of tmiksa
    > Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2019 5:39 PM
    > To: DMP Common Standards WG
    > Subject: [dmp-common] RDA DMP Common standards - February 2019 Call
    >
    > Dear group members,
    >
    > Since our last call in January, we have introduced some changes in the model. The last call was very fruitful and we would like to organise another one next week.
    > Please indicate your availability:
    >
    > https://doodle.com/poll/2mpt3hdchcu58a7k
    >
    > Current version of the model can be found here:
    > https://www.lucidchart.com/invitations/accept/ee26bc71-01a6-442a-b946-
    > 5b9c910fb926
    >
    > When looking at the model you may want to ask yourselves: does the set of fields would fulfil requirements of my funder/institution/template?
    > During the call we would like to hear your opinion on that, discuss points listed below and address any comments you may have.
    >
    > The model is likely to evolve within the next few days. We have some outstanding to-dos and would appreciate your feedback:
    > 1. Identifiers and their consistent use (do we provide a full HTTP
    > link for DOI, or only a number, etc.) 2. DMP State - do we need to indicate state of a DMP as a global flag: draft, submitted, etc. Is this universally understandable?
    > 3. DM Roles - dictionary?
    > 4. Cost types - dictionary?
    > 5. Cost units - dictionary?
    > 6. Dataset types - dictionary?
    > 7. Technical resources - dictionary?
    > 8. Host and quality of service fields? What is missing?
    >
    > We look forward to hearing from you!
    >
    > Best wishes,
    >
    > Tomasz Miksa
    > --
    > Full post:
    > https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/dmp-common-standards-wg/post/rda-dmp
    > -common-standards-february-2019-call
    > Manage my subscriptions: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist
    > Stop emails for this post:
    > https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/62103

    -------------------------------------------
    Paul Walk
    http://www.paulwalk.net

    Founder and Director, Antleaf Ltd
    http://www.antleaf.com

    Antleaf provides Management Services to DCMI http://www.dublincore.org
    -------------------------------------------

  • Tomasz Miksa's picture

    Author: Tomasz Miksa

    Date: 21 Feb, 2019

    Dear Sadia,

    I am one of the co-chairs of this WG. Thanks for reaching out to us! We’re open to all kinds of collaborations, especially with experts like you.

    Currently, we don’t have plans for the next call, but we can always organise one ad hoc! Maybe even tomorrow?

    Here is the current version of our model for exchange of maDMPs:
    https://www.lucidchart.com/documents/edit/346ec6f7-c37a-48cb-93ca-c0184f...

    We’re now working towards specific serialisations and generating easy to understand examples reflecting typical DMP use cases.

    Best wishes,
    Tomasz

    From: sadia.vancauwenbergh=uhasselt.be@rda-groups.org [mailto:sadia.vancauwenbergh=uhasselt.be@rda-groups.org] On Behalf Of SadiaVancauwenbergh
    Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2019 1:42 PM
    To: DMP Common Standards WG
    Subject: Re: [dmp-common] RDA DMP Common standards - February 2019 Call

    Dear Paul,

    My colleague met Peter Neish on the IDCC conference and just pointed me towards this working group. This wg is highly important to us as we are assisting the implementation of RD standards in Flemish Research Information Systems. On the other hand, I'm Ex. Board Member Standards and Classifications with respect to EuroCRIS, the organization on research information systems that creates the CERIF-XML format for exchanging research information in a standardized way.

    I noticed I just missed a tel call earlier this week, however do you have another one scheduled as I think it's highly relevant that both communities team up efforts.

    Kind regards,

    Sadia
    --
    Full post: https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/dmp-common-standards-wg/post/rda-dmp-c...
    Manage my subscriptions: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist
    Stop emails for this post: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/62103

  • Marie-Christine Jacquemot-Perbal's picture

    Author: Marie-Christine...

    Date: 01 Mar, 2019

    Hi all,

    I have started searching for dictionaries.

    Here is what I can suggest so far:

    DM roles: DataCite provides a list of roles for contributors: https://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-4.1/doc/DataCite-MetadataKernel_...
    Dataset types : again DataCite but maybe it is not sufficient.
    Technical resources. I am not quite sure how precise it should be. MERIL provides a list of categories : https://portal.meril.eu/meril/static/static_documents

    Best,

    Christine

    -----Message d'origine-----
    De : tmiksa=sba-research.org@rda-groups.org [mailto:tmiksa=sba-research.org@rda-groups.org] De la part de tmiksa
    Envoyé : mardi 19 février 2019 18:04
    À : DMP Common Standards WG
    Objet : Re: [dmp-common] RDA DMP Common standards - February 2019 Call

    Dear all,

    Thank you very much to all those who joined us today.

    The meeting minutes can be found here:
    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1P0VBZxglHCSJE2zXYhOC8H94yzlgBl5dz_sB...

    We are still waiting for your inputs on dictionaries:
    DM Roles - dictionary?
    Cost types - dictionary?
    Cost units - dictionary?
    Dataset types - dictionary?
    Technical resources - dictionary?

    Please also take a look at cardinalities assigned to classes and fields. Do they make sense to you?
    https://www.lucidchart.com/invitations/accept/ee26bc71-01a6-442a-b946-5b...

    Apart from these outstanding tasks, it seems that we have a pretty stable outline of our interchange format for maDMPs.
    In the next weeks we will work on providing examples consisting of:
    - a short use case, e.g. "I will keep me source code on GitHub"
    - a JSON example following our common model

    Best wishes
    Tomasz Miksa

    -----Original Message-----
    From: paul=paulwalk.net@rda-groups.org On Behalf Of paulwalk
    Sent: Monday, February 18, 2019 12:04 PM
    To: DMP Common Standards WG
    Subject: Re: [dmp-common] RDA DMP Common standards - February 2019 Call

    All,
    The connection URL for the RDA DMP Common standards call tomorrow (2019-02-19 17:00 CET) is:

    https://zoom.us/j/416673627

    Looking forward to the call!

    Paul

    > On 17 Feb 2019, at 23:03, tmiksa wrote:
    >
    > Dear group members,
    >
    > The winning slot for our next call is Tuesday, 19.02, 17 CET.
    >
    > Connection details will follow!
    >
    > Best wishes,
    >
    > Tomasz Miksa
    >
    > From: tmiksa=sba-research.org@rda-groups.org
    > [mailto:tmiksa=sba-research.org@rda-groups.org] On Behalf Of tmiksa
    > Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2019 5:39 PM
    > To: DMP Common Standards WG
    > Subject: [dmp-common] RDA DMP Common standards - February 2019 Call
    >
    > Dear group members,
    >
    > Since our last call in January, we have introduced some changes in the model. The last call was very fruitful and we would like to organise another one next week.
    > Please indicate your availability:
    >
    > https://doodle.com/poll/2mpt3hdchcu58a7k
    >
    > Current version of the model can be found here:
    > https://www.lucidchart.com/invitations/accept/ee26bc71-01a6-442a-b946-
    > 5b9c910fb926
    >
    > When looking at the model you may want to ask yourselves: does the set of fields would fulfil requirements of my funder/institution/template?
    > During the call we would like to hear your opinion on that, discuss points listed below and address any comments you may have.
    >
    > The model is likely to evolve within the next few days. We have some outstanding to-dos and would appreciate your feedback:
    > 1. Identifiers and their consistent use (do we provide a full HTTP
    > link for DOI, or only a number, etc.) 2. DMP State - do we need to indicate state of a DMP as a global flag: draft, submitted, etc. Is this universally understandable?
    > 3. DM Roles - dictionary?
    > 4. Cost types - dictionary?
    > 5. Cost units - dictionary?
    > 6. Dataset types - dictionary?
    > 7. Technical resources - dictionary?
    > 8. Host and quality of service fields? What is missing?
    >
    > We look forward to hearing from you!
    >
    > Best wishes,
    >
    > Tomasz Miksa
    > --
    > Full post:
    > https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/dmp-common-standards-wg/post/rda-dmp
    > -common-standards-february-2019-call
    > Manage my subscriptions: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist
    > Stop emails for this post:
    > https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/62103

    -------------------------------------------
    Paul Walk
    http://www.paulwalk.net

    Founder and Director, Antleaf Ltd
    http://www.antleaf.com

    Antleaf provides Management Services to DCMI http://www.dublincore.org
    -------------------------------------------

submit a comment